Teilt gerne meine Beitrage auf Telegram. Da YT immer offensiver zensiert, werd ich da eh nicht mehr viel tun können. Möglicherweise wird dies meine alternative Plattform.
Spannende Debatte:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29qDJHoDStA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29qDJHoDStA
YouTube
Dr Richard D Wolff Vs Dr David D Friedman | Socialism Vs Capitalism Debate | Podcast
Links to speakers:
Dr Wolff: www.democracyatwork.info
Dr Friedman: www.daviddfriedman.com
Huge thanks to Brenton Lengel for helping us connect with the speakers to get them on - and his link is here: https://www.youtube.com/user/Despanan
OUR PODCAST…
Dr Wolff: www.democracyatwork.info
Dr Friedman: www.daviddfriedman.com
Huge thanks to Brenton Lengel for helping us connect with the speakers to get them on - and his link is here: https://www.youtube.com/user/Despanan
OUR PODCAST…
Welche Argumente sind die besten für die Existenz Gottes? (Konnte leider nicht alle Kategorien nennen, da max 10 Antworten gehen)
Anonymous Poll
14%
Ontologische Argumente
19%
Teleologische Argumente (zB Fine Tuning)
14%
Kontingenz Argumente
10%
Kosmologische Argumente
24%
Argumentation über objektive Werte oder Moral
19%
Argumentationen über Bewusstsein
19%
Transzendenzargumente
14%
Argumentationen über geschichtliche Ereignisse
5%
Argumentation mit Wundern oder spirituellen Erfahrungen
33%
Sind alle schlecht.
Alte Studie, aber heutzutage wichtiger denn je:
"A pooled weighted average of 1.97% (N = 7, 95%CI: 0.86–4.45) of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices."
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
"A pooled weighted average of 1.97% (N = 7, 95%CI: 0.86–4.45) of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices."
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
Fanelli, Daniele. "How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data." PloS one 4.5 (2009): e5738.
Wie steht ihr zu Corona? (Umfrage gerne teilen.)
Anonymous Poll
5%
A) Der Virus ist so schlimm, die Maßnahmen sind nicht streng genug.
5%
B)Es gibt den Virus, er ist sehr gefährlich, die Maßnahmen sind gerechtfertigt.
26%
C) Es gibt den Virus, er ist gefährlich, die Maßnahmen sind ungerechtfertigt.
26%
D) Es gibt den Virus, er ist schlimmer als eine Grippe, aber nicht viel mehr.
16%
E) Es gibt den Virus, er ist ähnlich, wie die Grippe.
8%
F) Es gibt den Virus, aber er ist super harmlos.
3%
G) Es gibt den Virus gar nicht.
11%
H) Es gibt keine Viren.
Forwarded from Du Rove's Channel
As Telegram approaches 500 million active users, many of you are asking the question – who is going to pay to support this growth? After all, more users mean more expenses for traffic and servers. A project of our size needs at least a few hundred million dollars per year to keep going.
For most of Telegram’s history, I paid for the expenses of the company from my personal savings. However, with its current growth Telegram is on track to reach billions of users and to require appropriate funding. When a tech project reaches this scale, typically there are two options – start earning money to cover the costs, or sell the company.
Hence the question – which path will Telegram take? I’d like to make a few points to clarify our plan:
1. We are not going to sell the company like the founders of Whatsapp. The world needs Telegram to stay independent as a place where users are respected and high-quality service is ensured. Telegram must continue to serve the world as an example of a tech company that strives for perfection and integrity. And, as the sad examples of our predecessors show, that is impossible if you become part of a corporation.
2. Telegram is here to stay for a long time. We began developing our apps for our personal use over 8 years ago and have come a long way since then. In the process, Telegram changed the way people communicate in several aspects – encryption, functionality, simplicity, design, speed. This journey has just started. There’s much more we can – and will – bring to the world.
3. In order to make points 1 and 2 possible, Telegram will begin to generate revenue, starting next year. We will do it in accordance with our values and the pledges we have made over the last 7 years. Thanks to our current scale, we will be able to do it in a non-intrusive way. Most users will hardly notice any change.
4. All the features that are currently free will stay free. We will add some new features for business teams or power users. Some of these features will require more resources and will be paid for by these premium users. Regular users will be able to keep enjoying Telegram – for free, forever.
5. All parts of Telegram devoted to messaging will remain ad-free. We think that displaying ads in private 1-to-1 chats or group chats is a bad idea. Communication between people should be free of advertising of any sort.
6. In addition to its messaging component, Telegram has a social networking dimension. Our massive public one-to-many channels can have millions of subscribers each and are more like Twitter feeds. In many markets the owners of such channels display ads to earn money, sometimes using third-party ad platforms. The ads they post look like regular messages, and are often intrusive. We will fix this by introducing our own Ad Platform for public one-to-many channels – one that is user-friendly, respects privacy and allows us to cover the costs of servers and traffic.
7. If Telegram starts earning money, the community should also benefit. For example, If we monetize large public one-to-many channels via the Ad Platform, the owners of these channels will receive free traffic in proportion to their size. Or, if Telegram introduces premium stickers with additional expressive features, the artists who make stickers of this new type will also get a part of the profit. We want millions of Telegram-based creators and small businesses to thrive, enriching the experience of all our users.
This is the Telegram way.
It will allow us to keep innovating and keep growing for decades to come. We will be able to launch countless new features and welcome billions of new users. While doing that, we will remain independent and stay true to our values, redefining how a tech company should operate.
For most of Telegram’s history, I paid for the expenses of the company from my personal savings. However, with its current growth Telegram is on track to reach billions of users and to require appropriate funding. When a tech project reaches this scale, typically there are two options – start earning money to cover the costs, or sell the company.
Hence the question – which path will Telegram take? I’d like to make a few points to clarify our plan:
1. We are not going to sell the company like the founders of Whatsapp. The world needs Telegram to stay independent as a place where users are respected and high-quality service is ensured. Telegram must continue to serve the world as an example of a tech company that strives for perfection and integrity. And, as the sad examples of our predecessors show, that is impossible if you become part of a corporation.
2. Telegram is here to stay for a long time. We began developing our apps for our personal use over 8 years ago and have come a long way since then. In the process, Telegram changed the way people communicate in several aspects – encryption, functionality, simplicity, design, speed. This journey has just started. There’s much more we can – and will – bring to the world.
3. In order to make points 1 and 2 possible, Telegram will begin to generate revenue, starting next year. We will do it in accordance with our values and the pledges we have made over the last 7 years. Thanks to our current scale, we will be able to do it in a non-intrusive way. Most users will hardly notice any change.
4. All the features that are currently free will stay free. We will add some new features for business teams or power users. Some of these features will require more resources and will be paid for by these premium users. Regular users will be able to keep enjoying Telegram – for free, forever.
5. All parts of Telegram devoted to messaging will remain ad-free. We think that displaying ads in private 1-to-1 chats or group chats is a bad idea. Communication between people should be free of advertising of any sort.
6. In addition to its messaging component, Telegram has a social networking dimension. Our massive public one-to-many channels can have millions of subscribers each and are more like Twitter feeds. In many markets the owners of such channels display ads to earn money, sometimes using third-party ad platforms. The ads they post look like regular messages, and are often intrusive. We will fix this by introducing our own Ad Platform for public one-to-many channels – one that is user-friendly, respects privacy and allows us to cover the costs of servers and traffic.
7. If Telegram starts earning money, the community should also benefit. For example, If we monetize large public one-to-many channels via the Ad Platform, the owners of these channels will receive free traffic in proportion to their size. Or, if Telegram introduces premium stickers with additional expressive features, the artists who make stickers of this new type will also get a part of the profit. We want millions of Telegram-based creators and small businesses to thrive, enriching the experience of all our users.
This is the Telegram way.
It will allow us to keep innovating and keep growing for decades to come. We will be able to launch countless new features and welcome billions of new users. While doing that, we will remain independent and stay true to our values, redefining how a tech company should operate.
Da ändert die WHO einfach spontan mal Definition von Herdenimmunität. Die gibt es jetzt nur noch durch Impfung.
Ursprünglich, Jetzt
Ursprünglich, Jetzt