Forwarded from Australia’s Sons
Rogan is so naive. He thinks the mob is happy with apologies and explanations.
You don’t stave off vampires with a blood sample.
You don’t stave off vampires with a blood sample.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Québec city.
A Massive search party has been out all evening looking for missing intellectual toddler, Justin Trudeau (aged 9¾) who was last seen covered in boot polish.
Updates on the hour.
A Massive search party has been out all evening looking for missing intellectual toddler, Justin Trudeau (aged 9¾) who was last seen covered in boot polish.
Updates on the hour.
Battleground Melbourne | Topher Field
The last 18 months has seen Melbourne, Australia, fall from ‘Most Liveable’ to ‘Most Locked-down’ city in the world.
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/battleground-melbourne-topher-field/
Join The_Void
The last 18 months has seen Melbourne, Australia, fall from ‘Most Liveable’ to ‘Most Locked-down’ city in the world.
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/battleground-melbourne-topher-field/
Join The_Void
Topher Field – Battleground Melbourne | The Delingpod
Topher Field joins James Delingpole to discuss his excellent documentary,‘Battleground Melbourne’.
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/topher-field-battleground-melbourne-the-delingpod/
Join The_Void
Topher Field joins James Delingpole to discuss his excellent documentary,‘Battleground Melbourne’.
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/topher-field-battleground-melbourne-the-delingpod/
Join The_Void
Forwarded from The Crowhouse
YouTube
Why Meta Lost $230 billion [Biggest Company Loss in History]
--- About ColdFusion ---
ColdFusion is an Australian based online media company independently run by Dagogo Altraide since 2009. Topics cover anything in science, technology, history and business in a calm and relaxed environment.
ColdFusion Discord: …
ColdFusion is an Australian based online media company independently run by Dagogo Altraide since 2009. Topics cover anything in science, technology, history and business in a calm and relaxed environment.
ColdFusion Discord: …
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Universally despised.
Have the British police ever arrested the real perpetrator after a long investigation?
Literally everyone they’ve ever charged after a lengthy high profile investigation has turned out to be innocent.
From the Birmingham six to the Jill Dando murder. Innocent people are fitted up.
From Savile to grooming gangs the guilty walk free with impunity.
Jeremy Bamber is almost certainly innocent.
The British police must be the most incompetent and corrupt police service in The world.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-60278013
Literally everyone they’ve ever charged after a lengthy high profile investigation has turned out to be innocent.
From the Birmingham six to the Jill Dando murder. Innocent people are fitted up.
From Savile to grooming gangs the guilty walk free with impunity.
Jeremy Bamber is almost certainly innocent.
The British police must be the most incompetent and corrupt police service in The world.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-60278013
BBC News
Levi Bellfield confesses to Lin and Megan Russell murders, lawyer says
Lin Russell and her daughter Megan were attacked and killed in 1996 in Kent.
British cops...
Incompetent or corrupt ?
You decide.
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/kill-jill-the-dando-assassination-explained-part-1-of-4-richard-d-hall/
(All four parts in The_Void)
Incompetent or corrupt ?
You decide.
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/kill-jill-the-dando-assassination-explained-part-1-of-4-richard-d-hall/
(All four parts in The_Void)
The_Void
KILL JILL - The Jill Dando Assassination Explained | Richard D. Hall | The_Void
Richard D. Hall turns his attention to the 1999 assassination of Jill Dando.
The Cabal are fuming.
If enough morons don’t get the death booster, they are gonna have to nuke us all.
Which means they’ll have to go into lockdown in their underground complexes.
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-announces-deployment-over-140-warships-some-black-sea-after-biden-warning-1671447
If enough morons don’t get the death booster, they are gonna have to nuke us all.
Which means they’ll have to go into lockdown in their underground complexes.
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-announces-deployment-over-140-warships-some-black-sea-after-biden-warning-1671447
Newsweek
Russia Announces Deployment of Over 140 Warships, Some to Black Sea
The Russian Defense Ministry said the Russian Navy will have a series of exercises in all zones of responsibility from January to February, according to TASS.
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
I have now read the Human Rights review documentation and I am seriously concerned.
The review seeks to impose a rights culture that displaces personal responsibility in favour of "the public interest”.
The proposed reforms say “the international human rights framework recognises that not all rights are absolute and that an individual’s rights may need to be balanced, either against the rights of others or against the wider public interest.
Further concerning statements are:
“The idea that rights come alongside duties and responsibilities is steeped in the UK tradition of liberty, but is also reflected in the qualifications in the Convention and is explicit in Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights (‘Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible’). The increasing reliance on human rights claims over the years has, however, led to a culture of rights decoupled from our responsibilities as citizens, and a displacement of due consideration of the wider public interest”.
"Whilst human rights are universal, a Bill of Rights could require the courts to give greater consideration to the behaviour of claimants and the wider public interest when interpreting and balancing qualified rights. More broadly, our proposals can also set out more clearly the extent to which the behaviour of claimants is a factor that the courts take into account when deciding what sort of remedy, if any, is appropriate. This will ensure that claimants’ responsibilities, and the rights of others, form a part of the process of making a claim based on the violation of a human right”.
There are other concerning statements too, but you get the gist from the above.
Under the proposed reforms it is clear that Parliament is seeking to impose itself as arbiter of when a person can have human rights and when they cannot. This is disgraceful. It does not matter the crime, major or minor, a person must always have their human rights available to them and protected. It is abundantly clear to me that although the proposed reforms mention the courts power to decide matters, the govt expect the courts to be led on this by parliament, (and legislation), whatever the govt decide their rules to be at any given time.
This is an overt attack on personal freedoms in a bid to enforce communitarianism (which is worse than socialism, and is in fact totalitarianism). Wider interests should never trump an individual’s rights, the latter of which are fundamental freedoms that are God given.
These proposed changes seek to make sure that Human Rights are NOT fundamental and universal. Giving power to the courts to say you are not entitled to your human rights if they think your behaviour has not been what they consider "good" is a huge worry, knowing how much the courts are now refusing to challenge govt policy decisions and harmful legislation.
The separation of powers has been lost in this country for some time now. These proposed reforms confirm parliaments march to make itself the sovereign power and authority to decide on people's fundamental rights according to its own whim, and this must be stopped at all costs.
The consultation is open until 8th March and the link to respond to it is below. We desperately need everyone to take action and say no to these reforms.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights
The review seeks to impose a rights culture that displaces personal responsibility in favour of "the public interest”.
The proposed reforms say “the international human rights framework recognises that not all rights are absolute and that an individual’s rights may need to be balanced, either against the rights of others or against the wider public interest.
Further concerning statements are:
“The idea that rights come alongside duties and responsibilities is steeped in the UK tradition of liberty, but is also reflected in the qualifications in the Convention and is explicit in Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights (‘Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible’). The increasing reliance on human rights claims over the years has, however, led to a culture of rights decoupled from our responsibilities as citizens, and a displacement of due consideration of the wider public interest”.
"Whilst human rights are universal, a Bill of Rights could require the courts to give greater consideration to the behaviour of claimants and the wider public interest when interpreting and balancing qualified rights. More broadly, our proposals can also set out more clearly the extent to which the behaviour of claimants is a factor that the courts take into account when deciding what sort of remedy, if any, is appropriate. This will ensure that claimants’ responsibilities, and the rights of others, form a part of the process of making a claim based on the violation of a human right”.
There are other concerning statements too, but you get the gist from the above.
Under the proposed reforms it is clear that Parliament is seeking to impose itself as arbiter of when a person can have human rights and when they cannot. This is disgraceful. It does not matter the crime, major or minor, a person must always have their human rights available to them and protected. It is abundantly clear to me that although the proposed reforms mention the courts power to decide matters, the govt expect the courts to be led on this by parliament, (and legislation), whatever the govt decide their rules to be at any given time.
This is an overt attack on personal freedoms in a bid to enforce communitarianism (which is worse than socialism, and is in fact totalitarianism). Wider interests should never trump an individual’s rights, the latter of which are fundamental freedoms that are God given.
These proposed changes seek to make sure that Human Rights are NOT fundamental and universal. Giving power to the courts to say you are not entitled to your human rights if they think your behaviour has not been what they consider "good" is a huge worry, knowing how much the courts are now refusing to challenge govt policy decisions and harmful legislation.
The separation of powers has been lost in this country for some time now. These proposed reforms confirm parliaments march to make itself the sovereign power and authority to decide on people's fundamental rights according to its own whim, and this must be stopped at all costs.
The consultation is open until 8th March and the link to respond to it is below. We desperately need everyone to take action and say no to these reforms.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights
GOV.UK
Human Rights Act Reform: A Modern Bill of Rights
A consultation on proposals to reform the Human Rights Act 1998.