Predictive Programming and 9/11 | CVV

Predictive Programming suggests that certain symbols, themes, and events in media are intentionally planted to shape public perception and prepare people for future events.

#Documentary

https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/predictive-programming-and-9-11-cvv/

Join The_Void

9/11: Cheney to Mossad

Did the WTC demolition team call their operation “Gelitin”?

#CoincidenceTheory

Learn more about Gelitin, the B-Thing, the E-Team and The 127 Illuminated Windows:
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/9-11-from-cheney-to-mossad-rebekah-roth-sgt-report/

@thevoiduk

Occam's Razor

The simultaneous free-fall collapse of three skyscraper buildings on the same day, with explosions reported, is extremely unlikely to occur from any natural cause or structural failure. The most likely explanation is that the buildings were intentionally demolished using explosives or some other weapon wizardry.

9/11 archives in The_Void:
https://www.thevoid.uk/tag/911/

@thevoiduk

This video will explain why Boeing 767s did not fly into the Twin Towers.

Bad Physics.

These vacuous proclamations are the words of cowards who are too afraid to face their own public.

Triggered!

Ladies and Gentlemen, let me show to you an excellent example of the type of gaslighting and strawmanning you get from a Zionist made programmable answering machine.

You can smell the fear.

Barry Jennings.

Remember him?

Nobody but us conspiracy theorists does.

🙏🏻

They danced.

The 9/11 Broadcast.

Let’s go back to the actual day with one of the greatest truth seekers that ever lived, savant Bill Cooper.

With hindsight this is mind blowing!

https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/9-11-broadcast-bill-cooper/

This year's 9/11 annual poll results. Weirdly consistent with past years.

Lucky Larry

On September 11, 2001, Larry Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center complex, was not present at his usual meeting in the WTC. The World Trade Center was destroyed, and Silverstein collected a total of $4.55 billion in insurance payments.

#CoincidenceTheory

Much more on 9/11 and lucky Larry Silverstein in The_Void.

@thevoiduk

9/11 Off-script

No plane hit The Pentagon.

9/11 Off-script
Huge Explosions

“It’s not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse and the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way.”

9/11 in The_Void.

@thevoiduk

Independent journalist Aisling O'Loughlin is of the view that everything we have been told about events inside the City Room of the Manchester Arena on is true. I think the evidence clearly shows there was no bomb. Check it out!
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/iain-davis-and-aisling-oloughlin

All fake. All gay.

🎙 President of Russia Vladimir Putin's answer to a media question

❓ Question: Over the past few days, we have been hearing statements at a very high level in the UK and the United States that the Kiev regime will be allowed to strike targets deep inside Russia using Western long-range weapons. Apparently, this decision is either about to be made, or has already been made, as far as we can see. This is actually quite extraordinary. Could you comment on what is going on?

💬 President Putin: What we are seeing is an attempt to substitute notions. Because this is not a question of whether the Kiev regime is allowed or not allowed to strike targets on Russian territory. It is already carrying out strikes using unmanned aerial vehicles and other means. But using Western-made long-range precision weapons is a completely different story.

The fact is that – I have mentioned this, and any expert, both in our country and in the West, will confirm this – the Ukrainian army is not capable of using cutting-edge high-precision long-range systems supplied by the West. They cannot do that. These weapons are impossible to employ without intelligence data from satellites which Ukraine does not have. This can only be done using the European Union’s satellites, or US satellites – in general, NATO satellites. This is the first point.

The second point – perhaps the most important, the key point even – is that only NATO military personnel can assign flight missions to these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.

❗️ Therefore, it is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries become directly involved in the military conflict or not.

If this decision is made, it will mean nothing short of direct involvement – it will mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are parties to the war in Ukraine. This will mean their direct involvement in the conflict, and it will clearly change the very essence, the very nature of the conflict dramatically.

⚠️ This will mean that NATO countries – the United States and European countries – are at war with Russia. And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions in response to the threats that will be posed to us.