Unlocking Trump's Messaging and The Real Enemy.

Watch the full episode here: https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/trumps-genius-ciphers-the-science

Join us for Nightly J6 updates and Live prayers at 9PM ET!


🙏🙏https://t.me/ThePrisonersRecord?livestream

Senator Ron Johnson: “Today, I released a report showing that Biden health officials knew that safety signals for COVID-19 injection injuries were being hidden by their VAERS analytic algorithm.

They were shown an updated algorithm that signaled serious adverse events, but they refused to use it. Their cover-up jeopardized the health of millions of Americans.”

Read his interim report and see the records here: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/services/files/4DF802C8-DE9B-46C7-B470-37DD85569A76

@WeTheMedia

Called it for years 👇

🚨 BREAKING: PA SUPREME COURT RULES ON CAST VOTE RECORDS 🚨

This is BIG.

And it just changed the conversation on election transparency in Pennsylvania.

⚖️ The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled:

👉 Cast Vote Records (CVRs) are PUBLIC RECORDS

🧩 What does that mean?

CVRs are the digital records created by voting machines—
basically a line-by-line record of how ballots were counted.

✔️ No voter names
✔️ No personal identity
✔️ Just the data

🔥 The fight was this:

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania said:

❌ “These are basically ballots → keep them secret”

The Supreme Court said:
✅ “No. These are machine-generated records → they can be public”

💥 Translation:

➡️ Ballots = private
➡️ Data about ballots = public (in many cases)

That distinction just set a statewide precedent.

⚠️ Don’t miss this:

This doesn’t mean a total data dump with zero limits—
but it DOES mean the door to transparency just opened.

🧠 Why this matters:

✔️ Independent analysis becomes possible
✔️ More accountability in how votes are counted
✔️ Courts just drew a line in favor of public access to election data

💬 Bottom line:

For the first time at this level,
Pennsylvania’s highest court has said:

👉 Election data ≠ ballots
👉 And the public has a right to see it

👀 This one isn’t over—but it’s a major shift.

Watch what happens next.

Feels like winning to me.

Posted this three years ago. 👇👇👇

Every state should be sued in light of the Pennsylvania decision.

https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1500-103

^This document is the NIST specification for election system vendors to follow when they create their CVRs.

Note who the intended audience is.

Any election system vendor or election official who refuses to provide CVRs to the public is violating the intent of the federal specification.

You might want to remind them of that early and often if you’re having trouble getting your CVRs.

The Enemy Behind the Wire: What Cipher Do you Use?

Watch the full episode here: https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/trumps-genius-ciphers-the-science

Join us for Nightly J6 updates and Live prayers at 9PM ET!


🙏🙏https://t.me/ThePrisonersRecord?livestream

A Lesson from Tolkien: Why Trump did not seize the machines in 2020. We weren't ready. And we were due for a better ending.

Watch full episode: https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/trumps-genius-ciphers-the-science

Thank you to everyone that has subscribed to my Substack. Currently trending at #2 in the philosophy category ahead of some pretty big names.

Grateful.

Confirmed with attorney Stefanie Lambert, that the bullshit Hillsdale County (Michigan) election data breach / voter data access case has been dismissed.

This was a criminal prosecution brought by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel.

• Charges: Using a computer to commit a crime (7-year felony), computers – unauthorized access (5-year felony), and conspiracy to commit unauthorized access (5-year felony).

• Context: This stems from post-2020 election activities in Adams Township, Hillsdale County.

Lambert’s other case in Oakland County based on the same type allegations is on appeal, but is looking more and more likely to be dismissed based on today’s ruling.​​​​​​

“The case dates back to the aftermath of the 2020 election, when Scott allegedly provided election-related data to attorney Stefanie Lambert and an outside expert to review for potential irregularities. Prosecutors claimed that crossed the line into criminal conduct. But the defense argued – and the judge agreed – that nothing in the law made her actions a felony.

Kallman said in his press release, “The Court recognized what we have argued all along: there was never any criminal statute applicable to her proper and legal actions and, therefore, no crime was committed.”

https://www.michigannewssource.com/2026/04/exclusive-election-integrity-wins-michigan-ag-nessel-loses-as-judge-tosses-felony-case-against-clerk/