Nino, please go through each video, each clip, each text, each Flynn filing, and watch Joe squirm.

Accountability. Make em' watch their garbage.

Witness impeachment, in the law of evidence of the United States, is the process of calling into question the credibility of an individual testifying in a trial.

Which counties in AZ, ND, and MN will get rid of their election machines first? Do you live in any of these states? Do you have insights into whether any America first coounty commissioners or supervisors want to go to a tried and true voting system? The more rural and neglected, the better. Let us know in the comments.

Revised! Venues are always changing when folks hear the Professor is coming to drop truth bombs!

All interviews and interviewers are different. As a general rule, I'll speak to most anyone if my schedule permits.

Large audiences or small. You never know who will pass you on the way up the mountain, or crash and burn later. I've certainly experienced my share of highs and lows, with folks that either want to associate or disassociate with me depending on where they stand in the pecking order.

I can't worry about such things.

Humility is key. But keep in mind, that humility does not mean being a squish and letting lies go unchecked.

Information wars require consistent communication. Information wars have to be fought. You have to engage different audiences and be willing to risk being made to look like a fool, the hero, or the villain. Truth invariably clears all things up in time.

In the fog of confusion, the enemy will always attempt to create a caricature of your positions, or create straw man arguments. It's easy to defeat someone that doesn't exist, or is a figment of their imagination.

A principled interviewer both knows themselves, and knows what is right and wrong. They will hold steady in the midst of deception. Truth is the only concern. A lying or crafty guest will be reigned in by a principled interviewer.

The pragmatic interviewer is like the wind. They can be tossed about. Their positions are often only as strong as the last person they interviewed. Truth is not the priority. Rather, they are governed by the instinct to make sure their audience and guest likes them.

There are always opposite sides to a story. The question is how do you square what is being said in light of all the available facts and circumstances?

Hence, the question over credibility. There are liars and truth-tellers. There are those that are ill-informed and those that are experts. There are those that have been deceived and those that don't even know it.

Unfortunately, I don't exactly know what makes one principled rather than pragmatic.

I suppose like all things, God has declared His ways, and we are to conform to those ways.

I imagine that folks that abide by the unchanging nature of God will be found to be principled.

All else is sinking sand.

Just thinking out loud.

And to answer folks' questions, I'm not identifying who I believe to be principled and who is pragmatic. That's for you to decide. It's usually self-evident.

Same manipulation discovered in the 2021 Grand Junction Municipal Election, affecting 8,540 ballots that cannot be validated

@LizHarrington76

“...none of the election results from the 2020 General or 2021 Grand Junction Municipal Elections in Mesa County can be considered trustworthy.”

@LizHarrington76