From Kari Lake War Room on Twitter 🚨🚨🚨

The Co-Elections director of Maricopa County claimed that no ballots were designed to be fit on 20-in paper.

But an overwhelming number of them not only were but were used on Election Day.

This isn't rocket science, folks. This is sabotage.

From Kari Lake War Room on Twitter 🚨🚨🚨

48 of 113 ballots reviewed during our examination were 19-inch ballots produced on 20-inch paper.

This one-inch discrepancy cause chaos on Election day. Causing the mass rejection of these votes as they were attempted to be read through the tabulators.

If you will recall weeks ago, expert Dan Sundin, identified the issue being discussed above. Here is a recap:

CAUSE OF ARIZONA’S MASSIVE 30% MACHINE TABULATOR FAILURE IDENTIFIED-DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECTING REPUBLICANS AND ASSURING DELAY IN COUNTING

Expert, Dan Sundin, has honed in on the likely cause of why 30% of the tabulators in Arizona could not process the majority of Republican ballots on Election Day.

During the 2022 General Election, the election programming was set up to process 20” long ballots. This was a change from the 2020 General and the 2022 Primary ballots, which were 19” long - an inch shorter.

So when Arizona election officials say they don’t know what happened on November 8th because everything was the same as Arizona’s primary - this isn’t true.

The ballot size wasn’t the same.

Why does that matter?

The sample ballot pdf’s published by Maricopa County and the Runbeck-printed ballots used for mail-in voting were correctly made to to 20” length in the 2022 General. So there have been no problems processing Democrat-leaning, mail-in ballots.

However, the ballot on demand printers used for in-person voting only have 19" trays that contain 19” ballot paper.

This means, that for in-person voting, the official ballot image had to be compressed to fit on smaller paper than it was built for.

Compression causes the ink to be a little lighter than it should be, and thus affects how the tabulators read the ballot.

Maricopa County directed some voting centers to increase how dark the printing was, and this helped the problem somewhat.

The bigger problem, however, is that compressing the image skews where the ovals end up on the paper. The tabulators use a digital map to know where to look for votes. If the ovals aren’t where they belong, the tabulator won’t be able to find them, or will misread them. This problem will cause the tabulators to improperly read ovals, or not be able to read the ballot at all.

This is what most likely caused the high rejection rate and why so many ballots ended up having to be set aside in Drawer 3 - which led to another set of problems, and a lot of delay.

We all know delay favors fraud.

The equipment tabulating ballots at the MCTEC center is different than the Dominion ICP tabulators used for in-person, Election Day voting. Those scanners are more forgiving for shrunk/skewed ballots and are able to be manually adjudicated by election workers. That’s likely why we’re not seeing the same problems in the processing of ballots which were cast early in-person.

It’s clear that whatever logic and accuracy testing was done in Arizona to get ready for Election Day wasn’t a real world test.

The logic and accuracy test used pristine, pre-printed ballots that were professionally printed offsite and fed into the Dominion ICP tabulators to make sure they were working.

A real logic and accuracy test, however, would have used ballots printed on-site by the ballot-on-demand printers. That would have been a genuine end-to-end test, and it would have caught what ended up being a massive problem.

Since Republicans are more likely to vote in person on Election Day, they were disproportionately affected and disenfranchised by the incompetence of the election officials. Failing to correctly test the system to understand the effect of changing the ballot size was a fatal error. This amounted to a massive violation of voters’ constitutional rights, which requires equal protection under the law.

This issue didn’t affect the Democrat-leaning mail-in ballots. The Democrat-leaning, early in-person ballots are processed at the MCTEC Center on equipment more able to process the skewed images and manually adjudicate problem ballots.

We don’t know if all this was intentional or not. But the poorly-designed process and failure to properly test equipment under real world conditions have led to yet another third-world election in Arizona.

It’s worth noting that hand counting would not be affected in the slightest by a skewed ballot. Get rid of the machines.

WHOA!!!

When Kari's team met with the county yesterday to select the ballots to be reviewed, THE BALLOTS WERE NOT PROPERLY SEALED AGAINST STATE STATUTE.

Now Maricopa officials have to explain away how the configurations for their machines was purely accidental.

At 70 different locations.

Even though it takes an administrator with privileges to make the changes.

The defendants are going with the defense that they weren’t acting intentionally, but rather were a bunch of incompetent idiots.

Here’s the catch. From a legal perspective, gross negligence or reckless disregard of standards of care = intent.

Draza and Holly Kasun are talking about the Testimony in Kari Lake's Lawsuit. Get in here.

https://rumble.com/v21rb2o-kari-lake-goes-to-trial-watch-live-here.html

Whistleblowers will be crucial to establish intent.

There is enough evidence here to establish gross negligence—which should suffice.

This is where uniform jury instructions would come in to play.

While this is a bench trial, judges routinely rely on uniform instructions for the most precise definition of the law.

In most jurisdictions, “reckless disregard” or “gross negligence” provides the legal equivalent of intent.

This is especially helpful where defendants have been trained to lie on the stand.

Hopefully people can understand why I’ve been advocating for over a full calendar year for local officials, down to the precinct level, to withhold certification when fraud, lawlessness, or gross negligence occurs.

Notice how Steve Richer and company keep passing the buck to local administrators to avoid their own responsibility.

To certify something is to say it’s trustworthy.

Everyone tasked with certification owes a duty of care to We the People.

This…👇

Let me get this right.
- Hobbs team to judge, "the county boards certified the election. Nothing we can do about that ..."

- Hobbs to county election boards "certify or be charged with a felony and go to jail"

Something's not adding up here.

This 👆

Good evening patriots! We are continuing our live stream of the Kari Lake trial and will be joined by David Clements once today's session ends.

Join us live!

https://rumble.com/v21rb2o-kari-lake-goes-to-trial-watch-live-here.html

PROOF OF MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD IN AZ!!!

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/breaking-kari-lake-trial-reveals-42-5-of-randomly-examined-ballots-were-improper/

Canncon is on with David Clements. Get in here.

https://rumble.com/v21rb2o-kari-lake-goes-to-trial-watch-live-here.html

Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer Caught In Kari Lake Trial Admitting to Not Complying with the Law in Two Ways

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/maricopa-county-recorder-caught-kari-lake-trial-admitted-not-complying-law-two-areas/

"They Weren't Following the Legal Requirements for Chain of Custody" - Expert in Kari Lake Trial, Heather Honey, Destroys Maricopa's Defense

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/werent-following-legal-requirements-chain-custody-expert-kari-lake-trial-heather-honey-destroys-maricopas-defense/

Here’s a summary of the day’s events.

We won today. We haven’t won the case yet, but battles are fought and won before either side wins a war.

Richer perjured himself, 19” ballots were exposed, chain of custody is clearly broken, and Maricopa admits it doesn’t follow the law. The defense pissed the judge off, and if your thoughts are that the trial was only called as a deception, then it was a huge error because a ton of fraud and misconduct came out today.