David Clements
56.7K subscribers
4.86K photos
2.78K videos
92 files
7.88K links
Official telegram channel for x- Professor David K. Clements

You can support the Professor here: https://www.givesendgo.com/ProfessorDavidClements

Main: t.me/theprofessorsrecord
Chat: t.me/theprofessorsrecordchat

Arbitration room to reenter chat: https
Download Telegram
๐Ÿ˜‚
๐Ÿ‘9
Forwarded from PATRIOT ARTS FARM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
They got Trump this time!๐Ÿคฃ
๐Ÿคก182๐Ÿ˜147๐Ÿคฃ75๐Ÿ‘3โค2๐Ÿ‘Ž2๐Ÿคฎ2๐Ÿพ2๐Ÿค”1๐Ÿ™1๐Ÿ’”1
๐Ÿ”ฅ316๐Ÿ™34๐Ÿ‘27๐Ÿ‘20โค11๐Ÿ˜5๐Ÿฅฐ4
I havenโ€™t told many people this, but I recently defended the deposition of an expert in the Curling v. Raffensperger case out of Georgia. The same litigation that placed the Alex Halderman report under seal, with CISA later admitting there are major vulnerabilities with the Dominion machines.

Each of the depositions are the stuff of Hollywood. On one side of the deposition you had my client and yours truly. On the other side, you had 19 attorneys/representatives from different high powered law firms.

One of those firms is Morrison Foerster. Morrison Foerster has offices in Beijing, Hong Kong, and Shanghai, China. They also have partners within those firms that are members of the Chinese Communist Party.

We weathered 8 hours of CCP-backed-lawyers trying to orchestrate every narrative conceivable to connect people toโ€”and attackโ€”Donald Trump.

These law firms are the true sponsors of terrorism.
๐Ÿ”ฅ354๐Ÿคฌ105๐Ÿ‘36๐Ÿ™32๐Ÿ’ฏ9โค6๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ˜ˆ3
I know I'm over the target. That's why Reuters, the Washington Post, NPR, and every communist rag is coming after me. Here are some of the parties opposing our efforts to get to the truth. Satan's law firms.
๐Ÿ‘153๐Ÿ”ฅ85๐Ÿ™31๐Ÿ‘12๐Ÿคฌ7๐Ÿ‘€2๐Ÿค”1
Here's more.
๐Ÿ‘81๐Ÿ‘€36๐Ÿ™27๐Ÿ‘8๐Ÿคฌ7๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿค”2
And more.
๐Ÿ‘€84๐Ÿคฏ27๐Ÿ™19๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿค”4๐Ÿคฌ4
You don't deploy this kind of legal effort unless you are desperate to destroy legitimate investigation and accountability. I won't quit. Ever.
๐Ÿ™339๐Ÿ”ฅ84๐Ÿ’ฏ76โค29๐Ÿ‘14
I hope to have an interview based on the below๐Ÿ‘‡ investigation, and how CARES Act funding was a major vehicle for laundering money to subvert our elections.
๐Ÿคฌ167๐Ÿ˜ฑ19๐Ÿ™13๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿค”7๐Ÿ”ฅ4
~$5 Trillion has spilled out of the U.S. Treasury unto our Nation to cover the costs of the COVID โ€œMANDEMIC.โ€ With little or no oversight, much of the money has โ€œgone south.โ€ The money has been dispensed through channels. The channel most pertinent to this discussion is the Corona Virus Relief Fund (CRF).

Excel spreadsheet column headers that reflect source and application information for the CRF are too numerous to list across this document. For this discussion, only โ€œKeyโ€ Column headings of the ~21 headings in CRF fund spreadsheets are noted. The reader is invited to view all Excel spreadsheet column information in the listed, horizontal order at Corona Virus Relief Fund or HERE for the unedited Excel spreadsheet file.

Key Headings used here are simply the Prime recipient, Sub-recipient (Multiple Recipients) and Award amount.

Sub-recipients, Money Spent, and corresponding descriptions are really where the โ€œrubber hits the road.โ€ There is no accountability and verifiability if we donโ€™t know who exactly got the money (the application) and why they got it. Of the ~200K Excel entries in the CRF, the majority reflect a fair degree of accountability with respect to the above. Yet, there is one glaring smoking gun. That is the Sub-recipient column/category generalized as โ€œMultiple Recipients.โ€ For โ€œMultiple Recipients,โ€ there is no corresponding information that would verify or validate or justify the reason for spending the money.

Now hereโ€™s where The Oleโ€™ Buzzard has a vexing โ€œcase of the ass.โ€ Iโ€™ve been preaching, cajoling, and haranguing about the Cares Act as a source of funding Election Infection activities. No one has really listened so far. In view of the fact that the dustup in the air around Arizonaโ€™s Election Infections is as thick as molasses, itโ€™s time for some to pull their heads out and look at this.

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
MULTIPLE RECIPIENTS $1,856,987,708.00

MARICOPA, COUNTY OF
MULTIPLE RECIPIENTS $398,960,913.50

CITY OF PHOENIX
MULTIPLE RECIPIENTS $293,960,913.50

CITY OF TUCSON
MULTIPLE RECIPIENTS $ 95,634,512.10

MESA, CITY OF
MULTIPLE RECIPIENTS $ 90,89,099.40

PIMA COUNTY
MULTIPLE RECIPIENTS $ 87,107,597.40

Is Arizona stinking for you yet? Yep ... and I'll be your State stinks too.

To get the full impact of the fact that there are no relevant supporting, descriptive details for these expenditures other than the above, click on HERE for the unedited Excel spreadsheet file. I'll bet you'll find some "stuff" for your state in there. In other words, the money is being spent by whomever, however, whenever the recipient so desires far away from and beyond the view of those of us who own it.

Yes โ€ฆ the โ€œnaysayersโ€ are whining, โ€œNo proof!โ€

Tell me now, exactly who are the โ€œMultiple Recipientsโ€ and how did they spend the money โ€ฆ on what? If it looks like a skunk, smells like a skunk and itโ€™s headed for the henhouse โ€ฆ well โ€ฆ get out Ole' Smokey and the buckshot! What you see from the CRF above is only a tip of the iceberg that has cropped up and out of the Cares Act MANDEMIC cornucopia of fraud. As a number of Utahโ€™s Goodfellas have gleefully proclaimed, โ€œNever let a good crisis go to waste.โ€ See how Utahโ€™s Gov. Lilโ€™ Coxy spent some of his HERE. Multiply the foregoing by 50 States and more scams and you'll soon see the "monument" of fraud and corruption that's been built around the Cares Act.

Thereโ€™s only so much hand holding that I can do and Iโ€™m doing it at The Oleโ€™ Buzzardโ€™s โ€œHow to Shame the Bastardsโ€ Academy HERE. Get a wiggle on and join the โ€œblitzkriegโ€ to dive into and harvest the grift from/about your State out of the Cares Act.
s/The Ole' Buzzard
๐Ÿ‘140๐Ÿคฏ52๐Ÿ”ฅ28๐Ÿคฌ23โค3๐Ÿ™3๐Ÿ˜ฑ2๐Ÿ‘Ž1๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿค1
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
๐Ÿ‘196๐Ÿ”ฅ52๐Ÿ‘22๐Ÿ™21๐Ÿ’ฏ2
๐Ÿ‘55๐Ÿ”ฅ19
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
Trump Speaks Out On Changes To The Electoral Count Act

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/trump-speaks-changes-electoral-count-act/
๐Ÿ‘83๐Ÿ™51๐Ÿ˜ฑ15๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿ˜ข6
Forwarded from The Babylon Bee
๐Ÿคก302๐Ÿ˜42๐Ÿ–•22๐Ÿ‘15๐Ÿ‘Ž10๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ˜ฑ3๐Ÿ™2๐Ÿคจ2
Forwarded from The Patriot Voice (TPV John ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ)
So, to recapโ€ฆ

NOT only did Twitter collide with multiple three letter agencies on a fundamental level to censor/silence millions, but ALSO with our own US Military (specifically CENTCOM) at a shocking level to aid with psyops as a weapon against other countries.

This is an UNPRECEDENTED level of corruption.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/twitter-files-show-company-directly-assisted-in-us-military-psychological-operations_4935884.html
๐Ÿคฏ111๐Ÿคฌ100๐Ÿ‘8๐Ÿ’ฏ7๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿค”3๐Ÿ™2๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿ˜ˆ1
Forwarded from Nick Moseder (Nick Moseder)
โ€œMany emails from throughout 2020 show that high-level Twitter executives were well aware of DoDโ€™s vast network of fake accounts & covert propaganda and did not suspend the accounts.โ€
๐Ÿคฌ176๐Ÿ‘21๐Ÿคฏ8๐Ÿ’ฏ5๐Ÿค”3๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ˜ˆ2
Forwarded from Nick Moseder (Nick Moseder)
BREAKING: Kari Lake team has removed Katie Hobbs from list of witnesses. She will not be testifying at trial. Reasons unknown!

@WILFmoseder
๐Ÿค”180๐Ÿคก83๐Ÿคฌ51๐Ÿ’ฉ25๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿ™7๐Ÿ‘Ž5๐Ÿคฏ5๐Ÿ˜4๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1
Forwarded from Nick Moseder (Nick Moseder)
UPDATE: The reason the subpoena has been withdrawn is due to the scope of the trial.

Katie Hobbs testimony (apparently) has no relevance to the 2 remaining counts going to trial. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
๐Ÿคก115๐Ÿค”72๐Ÿ‘Ž21๐Ÿ™20๐Ÿคฌ15๐Ÿ‘10๐Ÿ’”7๐Ÿ”ฅ2
The above is head scratchingโ€ฆ.

Relevant evidence is extremely broad.

Rule 401: Evidence is relevant if:
(a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and
(b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.

There was complete maladministration of a statewide election, and Katie Hobbs, as the chief elections officer, wonโ€™t testify on the lack of chain of custody practices and machine functionality?

Highly relevant.

No one should be withdrawing subpoenas. Make the judge issue a ruling and preserve the issue for appeal as a legal error.
๐Ÿ‘195๐Ÿ”ฅ42๐Ÿ’ฏ18๐Ÿ™13๐Ÿค”10๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿคฏ4๐Ÿคจ3๐Ÿ‘Ž2
Katie Hobbs is a dumpster fire.

Judge just spared her from being ripped a new ๐Ÿ’ฉ๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ.

I just hope the attorneys didnโ€™t stipulate to the decision.

In my experience (160+ trials), stipulations only occurred when (1) the attorneys really knew their cases and their opposition, or (2) lesser attorneys were nervous about their ability to argue the rules of evidence during trial, and tried like hell to negotiate what could come in.
โค81๐Ÿ™55๐Ÿ‘16๐Ÿคก14๐Ÿค”9๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ’ฉ2๐Ÿ‘Ž1๐Ÿ˜1