التكنلوجيا السنة الجاية عبارة عن ثيرمودايناميك

Just wait till I finish my presentations.
I'll spam you with mathematical threads and quotes from books.

"My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists." - Nikola Tesla

'Tis but summertide, summertide sorrow

اكتشفت انو امتحان الفيزيا السنة الجاية ١٥ صفحة

what is knowledge?
the classical definition of knowledge is, a justifiable true belief, that's a bit loaded so let's break it down a bit.

starting with justifiable, what do we mean when we say justifiable, it usually refers to the speakers ability to come up with valid (doesn't necessarily mean true) logical argument in defense of said belief.
that can be in many forms, for an example: deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning... etc.
each of these is a large enough topic to earn it's own thread so we won't go into each, but I'll try to give an example of how they look.

deductive reasoning makes specific conclusions based on generalized statements, which goes something like the following:
Premise 1 - All men are mortal
Premise 2 - socrates is a man
conclusion - therefore socrates is mortal.

in contrast inductive tries to take generalized statements to make a specific conclusion, which looks something like this:
Premise 1 - socrates is a man.
Premise 2 - socrates is mortal.
conclusion - probably all men are mortal.

abductive reasoning usually the best prediction, according to an incomplete observation, for an example:
You hear bird sounds outside, you assume a bird was nearby.
it's how doctors diagnose diseases, and cops solve crimes, however it's most prone to errors given it incomplete nature.

keep in mind something being reasonably valid doesn't necessarily mean it being true, it just means it's logically coherent, for an example:
Premise 1 - all cats are mammals
Premise 2 - abnormie is a mammal
conclusion - abnormie is a cat
regardless of how much abnormie wants to be a cat we can see the flaw here, yet it's logically valid.
another thing to keep in mind you can agree with the conclusion and disagree with the premises or the other way around, all there is to it, is having a clear and non fallacious logic, that simple.

moving on to part 2 of our definition True, there isn't much to say here, it's simply coinciding with reality or being based in facts.
it's where the truth value of said knowledge come from.

part 3 is belief, what does it mean to believe something?
before we get into that, we have to familiarize ourselves with assertions and proposition what are those? assertions are statements that have truth value to it (doesn't mean it's true or false, means it can be either true or false), propositions are the underlying meaning of your assertion, regardless of the words used to utter your assertion.

for an example:
this is a cat
هذه قطة
este es un gato

all three assertions carry the same proposition, but said in different languages, now propositions have attitude to them, what do I mean by this? since assertions have truth value to them they can be either true or false, i could be not believing in something while trying to convince you of it, like in the example, I could be pointing to a dog and asserting it's a cat, which would be the propositional attitude of disbelief, or I can really be convinced of it being a cat than it would be called a propositional attitude of belief.

so what is a belief?
it's the propositional attitude of believing.
remember a belief doesn't have to be true or false, it's your attitude from it that matters.

in conclusion, only when it meets all three critirion it can be called knowledge, any less and it's a belief.
there you have it folks, we defined what knowledge is, explained each terms in details and now we move to Q&As, hope you enjoyed reading this as much as i enjoyed writing and it.

I don't want kids
Unless he's Sheldon Cooper