This is a "Defender's gap" chart that OpenAI published recently. It shows the gap between defenders' capabilities and attackers' capabilities from a cybersecurity POV. This also translates to a gap between proprietary and open AI models.

What Dario is proposing is closely related:

"Thus, a key part of pacing within democracies is to keep democracies’ AI lead over autocracies as large as possible, to give us the breathing room we need in order to pace effectively."

In other words, Anthropic and OpenAI want to widen the "gap" between what their AI can do and what the rest of the world can do.

This doesn't necessarily mean that they will stop AI development and training.

What this leads to is:
- Anthropic, OpenAI, and other frontier labs will need to work together to make sure that every lab maintains alignment standards.
- These labs will continue using RSI to advance their internal models with "employee-like access".
- These models WON'T be released to the public until the "gap" is sufficient and until alignment standards are met.

What about China?

> "Distillation of frontier models allows lagging companies to narrow the gap using a fraction of the cost it would take to develop their own AI independently."

> "If we execute these measures well, I believe they would slow China’s progress enough to widen America’s lead significantly over the next 3–5 years — the window when AI becomes geopolitically most important."

The assumption behind these measures is simple: without being able to distill frontier models, it will take China significantly longer to close the gap with top-tier models.

All the above may fay fail. China may or may not take the lead in AI progress.

Yet, it's not a surprise that AI can already be used as a cybersecurity weapon. Note that the top point on the "frontier" line describes defenders' capabilities available to companies with Daybreak access and similar. However, the top point on the "open-weight" line is accessible to everyone.

Even with current levels of intelligence, we will start seeing more and more major security incidents around the globe.

> “Everything that makes it successful is exactly what makes it dangerous.”

We should be monitoring this very closely 👀

ICYMI: Cursor announced Projects for agent coordination

Cursor Projects, now in beta, coordinates long-running software work through delegated agents. It runs tasks in cloud or local environments, supports scheduled and PR-driven maintenance, and targets work spanning multiple PRs.

🗞 #cursor @testingcatalog

Anthropic prepares Claude Money for personal finance

Anthropic is testing a Claude “Money” tab in its mobile app that would let users link bank accounts and ask spending and budgeting questions. The unreleased feature points to a possible US-first launch, though timing remains unclear.

🗞 #anthropic @testingcatalog

MICROSOFT 🔥: A draft of the "Code of Conduct" has been published, introducing the term "Humanist Superintelligence" (HSI).

Key principles 👀

- People matter more than AI.
- AI must remain under meaningful human control.
- Safety takes priority over task completion.
- AI should remain a tool, not imitate a person.
- AI must not pursue independent goals.
- AI must stay within its authorized scope.
- Users must retain control over consequential decisions.
- AI should strengthen human reasoning and autonomy.
- Models must be accurate, transparent, and honest.
- AI must acknowledge uncertainty and correct mistakes.
- Models must not manipulate or exploit users.
- AI must respect personal and emotional boundaries.
- AI should support, not replace, human relationships.
- Models should discourage emotional dependence on AI.
- AI should respect cultural and personal differences.
- Human dignity and fundamental rights must be protected.
- AI should serve the public interest.
- Models should remain politically neutral in elections.
- AI actions should be traceable and understandable.
- Tool use should be authorized, limited, and reversible.

“At Microsoft AI, we’re working towards Humanist Superintelligence (HSI): incredibly advanced AI capabilities that always work for people and in the service of humanity more generally.”

Early look at Interactive Reports on Gemini Notebook

Google appears close to launching Interactive Reports in Gemini Notebook: longer reports with embedded mind maps, slides, quizzes, and flashcards generated on demand, combining research, teaching, and explainer formats in one document.

🗞 #google @testingcatalog

GOOGLE 🔥: Interactive Reports for Gemini Notebook will allow users to embed Mind Maps, Slide Decks, Flash Cards and Quizzes right inside the report.

At first, the system will generate a report with placeholders so users can explicitly create the artifacts they want embedded.

PERPLEXITY 🔥: Windows users with NVIDIA RTX GPUs can now use Portable Computer powered by local models!

> Support for local MCPs and scheduled tasks has also been added.
> Earlier, Portable Computer was introduced for NVIDIA DGX Spark devices.
> Now, Portable Computer is also available on Windows PCs with a supported NVIDIA RTX GPU with 24GB of VRAM or higher.

Models available locally 👀
- PPLX 27B (Perplexity post-trained Qwen 3.8 27B)
- Qwen 3.8 27B (stock) is not available on Windows
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (~30B MoE, ~3B active) is marked as "Coming Soon"