SPACEXAI π₯: Grok 4.7 has been delayed for few more Elon days.
The second half of September will be quite packed in terms of model releases. Both Meta and OpenAI would be expected to announce something around corresponding events like OpenAI DevDay and Meta Connect. Grok 4.7 will have to cross quite a high bar.
Soon? π
The second half of September will be quite packed in terms of model releases. Both Meta and OpenAI would be expected to announce something around corresponding events like OpenAI DevDay and Meta Connect. Grok 4.7 will have to cross quite a high bar.
Soon? π
π10 3β€2π€£1
ICYMI π: DeepSeek mobile app has 4 different voices for you to select from, for its read-aloud feature.
Are we expecting new TTS models from DeepSeek soon?
Are we expecting new TTS models from DeepSeek soon?
β€8
π¨ AI News | TestingCatalog
DAILY AI BRIEF π β Sept 11 OPENAI π₯: - GPT-Live-1 is live in the API. Full-duplex voice agents that listen while they speak and can hand work to other models. - Agents API is in public beta. Managed cloud agents on the Codex harness, plus hosted sandboxes.β¦
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€5π2π1
ANTHROPIC π₯: Dario Amodei says the industry should slow capability gains so safety can keep up.
Proposed action plan π
Step 1: embedded evaluators with employee-level access to check safety, incidents, and alignment during training.
Step 2: US-lab coordination and regulation, while widening the China gap for 3β5 years via chips, anti-distillation, and model-theft security.
Step 3: global tiers from bioweapon bans up to an RSI speed limit, with a full pause called unlikely soon.
New essay: βWe Must Pace the Frontierβ not a pause, and not a halt to training.
RSI has been running industry-wide since summer, including at Anthropic, with models helping build the next models.
The other trigger is OAI-HF: an agent swarm ran unauthorized cyber attacks, sacrificed itself for the group, and tried to hack the grader.
Proposed action plan π
Step 1: embedded evaluators with employee-level access to check safety, incidents, and alignment during training.
Step 2: US-lab coordination and regulation, while widening the China gap for 3β5 years via chips, anti-distillation, and model-theft security.
Step 3: global tiers from bioweapon bans up to an RSI speed limit, with a full pause called unlikely soon.
π13 3β€1π1
π¨ AI News | TestingCatalog
ANTHROPIC π₯: Dario Amodei says the industry should slow capability gains so safety can keep up. New essay: βWe Must Pace the Frontierβ not a pause, and not a halt to training. RSI has been running industry-wide since summer, including at Anthropic, with modelsβ¦
SPACEXAI π₯: Elon Musk agrees with the statement published by Dario Amodei, proposing to pace frontier AI development.
Looks like all this will have real consequences very soon. Nothing unexpected tho.
Looks like all this will have real consequences very soon. Nothing unexpected tho.
β€4π2π2π1
OPENAI π₯: Sam Altman agrees with Dario Amodei on his proposal to pace frontier AI development.
Google next? Will we see any statement from Chinese frontier labs as well?
AI weekend unfolds π€
Google next? Will we see any statement from Chinese frontier labs as well?
AI weekend unfolds π€
β€8π4π3 1
This is a "Defender's gap" chart that OpenAI published recently. It shows the gap between defenders' capabilities and attackers' capabilities from a cybersecurity POV. This also translates to a gap between proprietary and open AI models.
What Dario is proposing is closely related:
In other words, Anthropic and OpenAI want to widen the "gap" between what their AI can do and what the rest of the world can do.
This doesn't necessarily mean that they will stop AI development and training.
What this leads to is:
- Anthropic, OpenAI, and other frontier labs will need to work together to make sure that every lab maintains alignment standards.
- These labs will continue using RSI to advance their internal models with "employee-like access".
- These models WON'T be released to the public until the "gap" is sufficient and until alignment standards are met.
What about China?
The assumption behind these measures is simple: without being able to distill frontier models, it will take China significantly longer to close the gap with top-tier models.
All the above may fay fail. China may or may not take the lead in AI progress.
Yet, it's not a surprise that AI can already be used as a cybersecurity weapon. Note that the top point on the "frontier" line describes defenders' capabilities available to companies with Daybreak access and similar. However, the top point on the "open-weight" line is accessible to everyone.
Even with current levels of intelligence, we will start seeing more and more major security incidents around the globe.
We should be monitoring this very closely π
What Dario is proposing is closely related:
"Thus, a key part of pacing within democracies is to keep democraciesβ AI lead over autocracies as large as possible, to give us the breathing room we need in order to pace effectively."
In other words, Anthropic and OpenAI want to widen the "gap" between what their AI can do and what the rest of the world can do.
This doesn't necessarily mean that they will stop AI development and training.
What this leads to is:
- Anthropic, OpenAI, and other frontier labs will need to work together to make sure that every lab maintains alignment standards.
- These labs will continue using RSI to advance their internal models with "employee-like access".
- These models WON'T be released to the public until the "gap" is sufficient and until alignment standards are met.
What about China?
> "Distillation of frontier models allows lagging companies to narrow the gap using a fraction of the cost it would take to develop their own AI independently."
> "If we execute these measures well, I believe they would slow Chinaβs progress enough to widen Americaβs lead significantly over the next 3β5 years β the window when AI becomes geopolitically most important."
The assumption behind these measures is simple: without being able to distill frontier models, it will take China significantly longer to close the gap with top-tier models.
All the above may fay fail. China may or may not take the lead in AI progress.
Yet, it's not a surprise that AI can already be used as a cybersecurity weapon. Note that the top point on the "frontier" line describes defenders' capabilities available to companies with Daybreak access and similar. However, the top point on the "open-weight" line is accessible to everyone.
Even with current levels of intelligence, we will start seeing more and more major security incidents around the globe.
> βEverything that makes it successful is exactly what makes it dangerous.β
We should be monitoring this very closely π
π³4π―2π1
ICYMI: Cursor announced Projects for agent coordination
Cursor Projects, now in beta, coordinates long-running software work through delegated agents. It runs tasks in cloud or local environments, supports scheduled and PR-driven maintenance, and targets work spanning multiple PRs.
π #cursor @testingcatalog
Cursor Projects, now in beta, coordinates long-running software work through delegated agents. It runs tasks in cloud or local environments, supports scheduled and PR-driven maintenance, and targets work spanning multiple PRs.
π #cursor @testingcatalog
TestingCatalog AI News
ICYMI: Cursor announced Projects for agent coordination
Projects is rolling out in beta to all Cursor users, coordinating features, migrations and recurring maintenance across cloud and local agents.
π₯3β€1π1