Forwarded from memi tecnosovversiv for ragazzettə agile
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
SCIOPEROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
❤9
PORCODDUE MI SON DIMENTICATO LA SCIOPAPERA STAMATTINA
❤20
Forwarded from Pagliare
quando il porno non è più sufficiente e devi massacrartelo su beccacce 23 - il tormento e l’estasi lo capisci si che stai a finitopoli
🥴8😭2
Every single morning, look at yourself in the mirror and ask: "What can I do today to liberate myself from work? What can I do to liberate others?"
🙏17❤3
Tu supporti l'assalto alla redazione de La Stampa perché sono sionisti.
Io supporto l'assalto alla redazione de La Stampa perché sono giornalisti.
Non siamo uguali.
Io supporto l'assalto alla redazione de La Stampa perché sono giornalisti.
Non siamo uguali.
❤29👍6🔥6
Magic and Planning are two extremes of the same methodology.
If we understand the future as shaped by human and inhuman action rather than being predetermined, then, at any given moment, we can think of the future as a set of outcomes called "variety". We can imagine some of them, while others remain unknown or unthinkable.
Human action, from individual choices to the construction of global systems, plays out as a game where specific futures are prevented and the likelihood of desirable futures is maximized.
We cook a meal not just in direct reaction to hunger, but to avert a future in which we know we will feel hungry. The action of making a sandwich averts a future of hunger.
In the same way, social systems such as states, organizations, or institutions act to skew the odds of specific futures based on the values they embody.
Restricting the variety of futures to make our preferred future happen is called Planning. Humans do that, plants and animals do it too, and so do social organisms.
What happens when none of the foreseeable futures are desirable? What if, for a quirk of our perspective and knowledge, the variety is insufficient? Addressing this problem with planning, design, or tools of control won't work, because these are disciplines designed to restrict variety and cannot expand it.
The expansion of perceived variety is done through Magic.
Aleister Crowley defined magic as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will", because, for Crowley's definition, planning, technology, systems are a subset of Magic. It's the whole array of human devices to modulate variety.
In our cybernetic frame instead, we can think of Magic as just the tools necessary to expand variety, finding pathways where rational analysis can see none.
In politics, magic and planning must go hand in hand to create change not only in accordance to will or to reason, but create change also in accordance to principles of liberation: restrict the variety of oppressive futures in order to expand the variety of human and more-than-human life.
If we understand the future as shaped by human and inhuman action rather than being predetermined, then, at any given moment, we can think of the future as a set of outcomes called "variety". We can imagine some of them, while others remain unknown or unthinkable.
Human action, from individual choices to the construction of global systems, plays out as a game where specific futures are prevented and the likelihood of desirable futures is maximized.
We cook a meal not just in direct reaction to hunger, but to avert a future in which we know we will feel hungry. The action of making a sandwich averts a future of hunger.
In the same way, social systems such as states, organizations, or institutions act to skew the odds of specific futures based on the values they embody.
Restricting the variety of futures to make our preferred future happen is called Planning. Humans do that, plants and animals do it too, and so do social organisms.
What happens when none of the foreseeable futures are desirable? What if, for a quirk of our perspective and knowledge, the variety is insufficient? Addressing this problem with planning, design, or tools of control won't work, because these are disciplines designed to restrict variety and cannot expand it.
The expansion of perceived variety is done through Magic.
Aleister Crowley defined magic as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will", because, for Crowley's definition, planning, technology, systems are a subset of Magic. It's the whole array of human devices to modulate variety.
In our cybernetic frame instead, we can think of Magic as just the tools necessary to expand variety, finding pathways where rational analysis can see none.
In politics, magic and planning must go hand in hand to create change not only in accordance to will or to reason, but create change also in accordance to principles of liberation: restrict the variety of oppressive futures in order to expand the variety of human and more-than-human life.
🤯11🤡2🥴1