gpg: qubes-secpack/keys/security-team/retired: read error: Is a directory
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: key 4AC18DE1112E1490: public key "Simon Gaiser (Qubes Security Pack signing key)" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 17
gpg: imported: 16
gpg: unchanged: 1
gpg: marginals needed: 3 completes needed: 1 trust model: pgp
gpg: depth: 0 valid: 1 signed: 6 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
gpg: depth: 1 valid: 6 signed: 0 trust: 6-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
Verify signed Git tags.
$ cd qubes-secpack/
$ git tag -v `git describe`
object 266e14a6fae57c9a91362c9ac784d3a891f4d351
type commit
tag marmarek_sec_266e14a6
tagger Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 1677757924 +0100
Tag for commit 266e14a6fae57c9a91362c9ac784d3a891f4d351
gpg: Signature made Thu 02 Mar 2023 03:52:04 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key 2D1771FE4D767EDC76B089FAD655A4F21830E06A
gpg: Good signature from "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki (Qubes security pack)" [full]
The exact output will differ, but the final line should always start with gpg: Good signature from... followed by an appropriate key. The [full] indicates full trust, which this key inherits in virtue of being validly signed by the QMSK.
Verify PGP signatures, e.g.:
$ cd QSBs/
$ gpg --verify qsb-087-2022.txt.sig.marmarek qsb-087-2022.txt
gpg: Signature made Wed 23 Nov 2022 04:05:51 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key 2D1771FE4D767EDC76B089FAD655A4F21830E06A
gpg: Good signature from "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki (Qubes security pack)" [full]
$ gpg --verify qsb-087-2022.txt.sig.simon qsb-087-2022.txt
gpg: Signature made Wed 23 Nov 2022 03:50:42 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key EA18E7F040C41DDAEFE9AA0F4AC18DE1112E1490
gpg: Good signature from "Simon Gaiser (Qubes Security Pack signing key)" [full]
$ cd ../canaries/
$ gpg --verify canary-034-2023.txt.sig.marmarek canary-034-2023.txt
gpg: Signature made Thu 02 Mar 2023 03:51:48 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key 2D1771FE4D767EDC76B089FAD655A4F21830E06A
gpg: Good signature from "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki (Qubes security pack)" [full]
$ gpg --verify canary-034-2023.txt.sig.simon canary-034-2023.txt
gpg: Signature made Thu 02 Mar 2023 01:47:52 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key EA18E7F040C41DDAEFE9AA0F4AC18DE1112E1490
gpg: Good signature from "Simon Gaiser (Qubes Security Pack signing key)" [full]
Again, the exact output will differ, but the final line of output from each gpg --verify command should always start with gpg: Good signature from... followed by an appropriate key.
For this announcement (Qubes Canary 047), the commands are:
$ gpg --verify canary-047-2026.txt.sig.marmarek canary-047-2026.txt
$ gpg --verify canary-047-2026.txt.sig.simon canary-047-2026.txt
You can also verify the signatures directly from this announcement in addition to or instead of verifying the files from the qubes-secpack. Simply copy and paste the Qubes Canary 047 text into a plain text file and do the same for both signature files. Then, perform the same authentication steps as listed above, substituting the filenames above with the names of the files you just created.
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: key 4AC18DE1112E1490: public key "Simon Gaiser (Qubes Security Pack signing key)" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 17
gpg: imported: 16
gpg: unchanged: 1
gpg: marginals needed: 3 completes needed: 1 trust model: pgp
gpg: depth: 0 valid: 1 signed: 6 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
gpg: depth: 1 valid: 6 signed: 0 trust: 6-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
Verify signed Git tags.
$ cd qubes-secpack/
$ git tag -v `git describe`
object 266e14a6fae57c9a91362c9ac784d3a891f4d351
type commit
tag marmarek_sec_266e14a6
tagger Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 1677757924 +0100
Tag for commit 266e14a6fae57c9a91362c9ac784d3a891f4d351
gpg: Signature made Thu 02 Mar 2023 03:52:04 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key 2D1771FE4D767EDC76B089FAD655A4F21830E06A
gpg: Good signature from "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki (Qubes security pack)" [full]
The exact output will differ, but the final line should always start with gpg: Good signature from... followed by an appropriate key. The [full] indicates full trust, which this key inherits in virtue of being validly signed by the QMSK.
Verify PGP signatures, e.g.:
$ cd QSBs/
$ gpg --verify qsb-087-2022.txt.sig.marmarek qsb-087-2022.txt
gpg: Signature made Wed 23 Nov 2022 04:05:51 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key 2D1771FE4D767EDC76B089FAD655A4F21830E06A
gpg: Good signature from "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki (Qubes security pack)" [full]
$ gpg --verify qsb-087-2022.txt.sig.simon qsb-087-2022.txt
gpg: Signature made Wed 23 Nov 2022 03:50:42 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key EA18E7F040C41DDAEFE9AA0F4AC18DE1112E1490
gpg: Good signature from "Simon Gaiser (Qubes Security Pack signing key)" [full]
$ cd ../canaries/
$ gpg --verify canary-034-2023.txt.sig.marmarek canary-034-2023.txt
gpg: Signature made Thu 02 Mar 2023 03:51:48 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key 2D1771FE4D767EDC76B089FAD655A4F21830E06A
gpg: Good signature from "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki (Qubes security pack)" [full]
$ gpg --verify canary-034-2023.txt.sig.simon canary-034-2023.txt
gpg: Signature made Thu 02 Mar 2023 01:47:52 AM PST
gpg: using RSA key EA18E7F040C41DDAEFE9AA0F4AC18DE1112E1490
gpg: Good signature from "Simon Gaiser (Qubes Security Pack signing key)" [full]
Again, the exact output will differ, but the final line of output from each gpg --verify command should always start with gpg: Good signature from... followed by an appropriate key.
For this announcement (Qubes Canary 047), the commands are:
$ gpg --verify canary-047-2026.txt.sig.marmarek canary-047-2026.txt
$ gpg --verify canary-047-2026.txt.sig.simon canary-047-2026.txt
You can also verify the signatures directly from this announcement in addition to or instead of verifying the files from the qubes-secpack. Simply copy and paste the Qubes Canary 047 text into a plain text file and do the same for both signature files. Then, perform the same authentication steps as listed above, substituting the filenames above with the names of the files you just created.
Amazon Ring Sued for Facial Recognition Technology: Here's Why It May Violate Privacy Laws
https://www.cnet.com/home/security/amazon-ring-sued-face-ai-technology-violate-privacy-laws/
Ring's face-detecting AI is problematic, but it's far from the only security brand to use it.
https://www.cnet.com/home/security/amazon-ring-sued-face-ai-technology-violate-privacy-laws/
Ring's face-detecting AI is problematic, but it's far from the only security brand to use it.
Amazon to Show AI-Generated Product Images When You Shop for Real-Life Products
https://www.cnet.com/news/amazon-shopping-ai-generated-product-images-search/
The images won't show real products you can buy, but they will illustrate general terms such as "cowl neck" or "rattan."
https://www.cnet.com/news/amazon-shopping-ai-generated-product-images-search/
The images won't show real products you can buy, but they will illustrate general terms such as "cowl neck" or "rattan."
Charlie Is an AI Assistant Built to Serve You, Not Our AI Overlords
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/charlie-is-an-ai-assistant-built-to-serve-you-not-our-ai-overlords/
First, he invented the web. Now Tim Berners-Lee is reinventing the AI agent to work for us.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/charlie-is-an-ai-assistant-built-to-serve-you-not-our-ai-overlords/
First, he invented the web. Now Tim Berners-Lee is reinventing the AI agent to work for us.
Today's Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for June 4, #1811
https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/todays-wordle-hints-answer-and-help-for-june-4-1811/
Here are hints and the answer for today's Wordle for June 4, No. 1,811.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/todays-wordle-hints-answer-and-help-for-june-4-1811/
Here are hints and the answer for today's Wordle for June 4, No. 1,811.
Today's NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints and Answers for June 4, #619
https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/todays-nyt-connections-sports-edition-hints-and-answers-for-june-4-619/
Here are hints and the answers for the NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle No. 619 for Thursday, June 4.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/todays-nyt-connections-sports-edition-hints-and-answers-for-june-4-619/
Here are hints and the answers for the NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle No. 619 for Thursday, June 4.
Best Smart Sprinklers for 2026: Irrigation the Easy Way
https://www.cnet.com/home/smart-home/best-smart-sprinklers/
We've tested smart sprinklers: Here's why you should have one, and which models proved the best.
https://www.cnet.com/home/smart-home/best-smart-sprinklers/
We've tested smart sprinklers: Here's why you should have one, and which models proved the best.
I Spoke With an AI Deepfake Hunter, and Here's What You Should Know
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/ai-deepfake-hunter-loti-luke-arrigoni-interview/
Loti AI CEO Luke Arrigoni breaks down the world of deepfakes -- of celebrities and beyond -- and some of it sounds a little dystopian.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/ai-deepfake-hunter-loti-luke-arrigoni-interview/
Loti AI CEO Luke Arrigoni breaks down the world of deepfakes -- of celebrities and beyond -- and some of it sounds a little dystopian.
WWDC Will Be Tim Cook's Swan Song. I Expect Something Siri-ous
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/wwdc-2026-tim-cook-last-apple-event-as-ceo/
Commentary: Before he bows out after an undeniably successful tenure at Apple's helm, there's one final thing Cook will want to tick off his to-do list.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/wwdc-2026-tim-cook-last-apple-event-as-ceo/
Commentary: Before he bows out after an undeniably successful tenure at Apple's helm, there's one final thing Cook will want to tick off his to-do list.
I Tested the Razr Ultra 2026 and Think Motorola Has Lost Its Mind video
https://www.cnet.com/videos/i-tested-the-razr-ultra-2026-and-think-motorola-has-lost-its-mind/
Motorola released a new Razr Ultra, and it's a lot like last year's model, which earned a CNET Editors' Choice award. But do minimal upgrades, and a $200 price hike make the 2026 Razr Ultra a worthy buy? We tested it to find out.
https://www.cnet.com/videos/i-tested-the-razr-ultra-2026-and-think-motorola-has-lost-its-mind/
Motorola released a new Razr Ultra, and it's a lot like last year's model, which earned a CNET Editors' Choice award. But do minimal upgrades, and a $200 price hike make the 2026 Razr Ultra a worthy buy? We tested it to find out.
Motorola's $1,500 Razr Ultra Looks Swanky in Alcantara
https://www.cnet.com/pictures/motorolas-1500-razr-ultra-looks-swanky-in-alcantara/
The 2026 Razr Ultra is available in a Pantone orient blue color and with an Alcantara back. And it is gorgeous.
https://www.cnet.com/pictures/motorolas-1500-razr-ultra-looks-swanky-in-alcantara/
The 2026 Razr Ultra is available in a Pantone orient blue color and with an Alcantara back. And it is gorgeous.
48 Hours With the Oura Ring 5: The New Gold Standard
https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/oura-ring-5-first-impressions-oura-struck-gold/
I knew the minute I put it on my finger that the sleek new ring was going to be a game changer. And that's before any of the health tracking.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/oura-ring-5-first-impressions-oura-struck-gold/
I knew the minute I put it on my finger that the sleek new ring was going to be a game changer. And that's before any of the health tracking.
The New Razr Ultra Is the Best Flip Phone I've Tested, but You Shouldn't Buy It
https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/motorola-razr-ultra-2026-review/
Motorola's new Ultra is a lot like last year's model but its $1,500 price is $200 more. It's not the slam dunk that it should be, even though I like it.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/motorola-razr-ultra-2026-review/
Motorola's new Ultra is a lot like last year's model but its $1,500 price is $200 more. It's not the slam dunk that it should be, even though I like it.
I Took 200 Photos With the Motorola Razr Ultra and Here's What I Learned
https://www.cnet.com/pictures/200-photos-from-the-motorola-razr-ultra-2026/
The 2026 Razr Ultra has the same cameras as the 2025 version. But there's a new LOFIC image sensor on the main camera, which I tested around San Francisco.
https://www.cnet.com/pictures/200-photos-from-the-motorola-razr-ultra-2026/
The 2026 Razr Ultra has the same cameras as the 2025 version. But there's a new LOFIC image sensor on the main camera, which I tested around San Francisco.
Siri's Google Brain: What to Expect at WWDC 2026 video
https://www.cnet.com/videos/siris-google-brain-what-to-expect-at-wwdc-2026/
Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference is days away. Here's what the iPhone Ultra rumors, Apple's track record and Siri's new Google powers tell us about what to expect.
https://www.cnet.com/videos/siris-google-brain-what-to-expect-at-wwdc-2026/
Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference is days away. Here's what the iPhone Ultra rumors, Apple's track record and Siri's new Google powers tell us about what to expect.
Belkin's Pricey New Battery Grip Makes My Switch 2 Feel Like a Steam Deck
https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/belkins-pricey-new-battery-grip-makes-my-switch-2-feel-like-a-steam-deck/
The $100 accessory includes a snap-on battery and large grips, but it makes the Switch 2 a bulky boy.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/belkins-pricey-new-battery-grip-makes-my-switch-2-feel-like-a-steam-deck/
The $100 accessory includes a snap-on battery and large grips, but it makes the Switch 2 a bulky boy.
Nvidia RTX Spark Is a Revelation for Windows Creators video
https://www.cnet.com/videos/spark/
Nvidia just announced the RTX Spark, a brand-new ARM-based Windows chip that could finally be the "Apple Silicon moment" PC users have been waiting for. In this video, we break down everything you need to know about this powerhouse processor. We explore what this means for AI power users, creators and gamers.
https://www.cnet.com/videos/spark/
Nvidia just announced the RTX Spark, a brand-new ARM-based Windows chip that could finally be the "Apple Silicon moment" PC users have been waiting for. In this video, we break down everything you need to know about this powerhouse processor. We explore what this means for AI power users, creators and gamers.
Cisco CEO: AI network traffic will 'triple' over the next 3 years
https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/a/y2026/m06/cisco-ceo-ai-network-traffic-will-triple-over-the-next-3-years.html?source=rss
https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/a/y2026/m06/cisco-ceo-ai-network-traffic-will-triple-over-the-next-3-years.html?source=rss
Cisco (CSCO) CEO Chuck Robbins joins Yahoo Finance Executive Editor Brian Sozzi on Opening Bid to discuss Cisco's role in building the infrastructure behind the AI boom and why he sees parallels between today's AI investment cycle and the internet buildout of the late 1990s.
More RSS Feeds: https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/rss-feeds.html (https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/rss-feeds.html?source=rss)
More RSS Feeds: https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/rss-feeds.html (https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/rss-feeds.html?source=rss)
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Authenticated Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-privesc-4uxFrdzx?vs_f=Cisco%20Security%20Advisory%26vs_cat=Security%20Intelligence%26vs_type=RSS%26vs_p=Cisco%20Catalyst%20SD-WAN%20Manager%20Authenticated%20Privilege%20Escalation%20Vulnerability%26vs_k=1
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root by supplying a crafted file to the affected system.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted file to the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform command injection attacks on an affected system and elevate their privileges as the root user.
To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have netadmin privileges on the affected system. This would require valid credentials or exploitation of CVE-2026-20182 (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-rpa2-v69WY2SW) or CVE-2026-20127 (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-rpa-EHchtZk). Cisco is not aware of successful exploitation by other methods. Cisco has observed limited cases where the exploitation of this bug resulted in a configuration change pushed to edge devices.
Cisco recommends that customers upgrade to the fixed software that is documented in the Catalyst SD-WAN Security Advisory (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-rpa2-v69WY2SW) that was published on May 14, 2026, and verify the configuration of the edge devices.
Cisco has not released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Important: To preserve possible indicators of compromise, customers should issue the request admin-tech command from each of the control components in the SD-WAN deployment before upgrading. After the admin-tech file has been collected, software should be upgraded at the earliest opportunity.
Before upgrading an SD-WAN deployment to a fixed release, retain relevant logs. After upgrading, verify that the system has not been compromised by checking the logs for the indicators of compromise as documented in this advisory. If the logs show indicators of compromise and the system is confirmed to be compromised, applying the software update alone will not resolve the vulnerability. In such cases, follow the specific remediation steps that will be provided by the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) to help secure the system. This section will be updated as information becomes available.
This advisory is available at the following link:
https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-privesc-4uxFrdzx
Security Impact Rating: High
CVE: CVE-2026-20245
https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-privesc-4uxFrdzx?vs_f=Cisco%20Security%20Advisory%26vs_cat=Security%20Intelligence%26vs_type=RSS%26vs_p=Cisco%20Catalyst%20SD-WAN%20Manager%20Authenticated%20Privilege%20Escalation%20Vulnerability%26vs_k=1
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root by supplying a crafted file to the affected system.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted file to the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform command injection attacks on an affected system and elevate their privileges as the root user.
To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have netadmin privileges on the affected system. This would require valid credentials or exploitation of CVE-2026-20182 (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-rpa2-v69WY2SW) or CVE-2026-20127 (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-rpa-EHchtZk). Cisco is not aware of successful exploitation by other methods. Cisco has observed limited cases where the exploitation of this bug resulted in a configuration change pushed to edge devices.
Cisco recommends that customers upgrade to the fixed software that is documented in the Catalyst SD-WAN Security Advisory (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-rpa2-v69WY2SW) that was published on May 14, 2026, and verify the configuration of the edge devices.
Cisco has not released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Important: To preserve possible indicators of compromise, customers should issue the request admin-tech command from each of the control components in the SD-WAN deployment before upgrading. After the admin-tech file has been collected, software should be upgraded at the earliest opportunity.
Before upgrading an SD-WAN deployment to a fixed release, retain relevant logs. After upgrading, verify that the system has not been compromised by checking the logs for the indicators of compromise as documented in this advisory. If the logs show indicators of compromise and the system is confirmed to be compromised, applying the software update alone will not resolve the vulnerability. In such cases, follow the specific remediation steps that will be provided by the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) to help secure the system. This section will be updated as information becomes available.
This advisory is available at the following link:
https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sdwan-privesc-4uxFrdzx
Security Impact Rating: High
CVE: CVE-2026-20245