Morning all. We have had some bad news regarding James Costello. He has asked us to make this public because he wants people to know what he’s facing.

James has received a result from his application to be downgraded to a category C prisoner (from a category B prisoner). The result is, according to the letter given to James, that he will NOT be moved down to category C. The letter explains various ways that James is a model prisoner and that he hasn’t done anything wrong, but vaguely alludes to “circumstances not entirely within his control” that cause some concern. James is also being forced to have a psychological evaluation which cannot happen until May next year.

The other prisoners James has told are flabbergasted, but as always, James is taking it all in his stride and staying his usual stoical self.

TL;DR: James Costello has been denied a recategorisation which would have granted him a nicer prison and more freedoms and privileges, and he’s been told it’s nothing to do with his behaviour but is instead because of things outside of his control.

People have called me stupid because of my insistence on communicating with the prisoners. They want to take a "softly softly" approach to making life easier for their particular prisoner. The issue isn't my alleged stupidity. It is that my goal is totally different from theirs, and my detractors are too stupid to grasp that. They apparently just want their particular prisoners to be helped, so that prisoners are helped one by one. So each prisoner and his supporters starts from scratch every time, for ever. They imagine that this is a charitable operation; it is only indirectly so, because the goal is actually political. I want to see this system discredited, cornered and broken, and that will only happen through group activity, learning from each case, contesting each human rights violation, exposing the selective application of the establishment's supposed principles of justice, and establishing precedents.

Good evening brothers.

Should we be surprised when the (((Governor))) of the Prison starts playing silly, pathetic games again?
Of course not, it's all they have to amuse themselves in their sad corrupt little world.

So, today I've just found out that the prison has banned me from all communication with Ash, phone, letters, email and of course visiting.

Which is what was booked for this coming Sunday. Two of us were due to visit.

I only found out of this ban via a message from his wife, and not the prison.
They obviously wanted us to drive across the country and get turned away, I'm sure that would of amused them, silly people.

After a phone call with the prison visitor desk, very helpful by the way, they knew nothing of the ban and had to go find out what's happening.
A letter will be in the post was the answer explaining why I've been banned.

This happened at Swaleside also when Ash arrived there. They banned me twice for 'muh XRW' language....yawn...and after a number of letters they dropped the ban, and admin error they said🙄.

This is just another game to play with our minds and mess Ash about.
But guess what, he's stronger than any of you system dwelling creatures.

Also to add to the 'games' they like to play Ash had his cell searched and items removed. Just a coincidence of course, it was a book I'd recently sent him, The Heirs of Abraham, (an interesting read, I'll post a link to it)
Plus they took away a small crucifix and a his WSAC t-shirt, which funny enough, was mentioned during a telephone conversation last week, just a coincidence of course...ah the little games they amuse themselves with.

So that's where we are at the moment, I'll keep you posted of any developments and the letter that's on its way to tell me how XRW naughty I am..🙄😂

Hail Victory 0/

This is good news, in an adjacent way. Not that Trump is "our guy," and perhaps he cynically wants to do something for Whites to lift their morale and therefore recruitment for the next major war, but it shows that political leaders can just release people when given suitable incentives.

🚨Breaking: President Trump has announced the immediate pardon of 1,500 January 6th "Stop the Steal" defendants via executive order.

📎SOURCE

For more #USA news subscribe to @justicereport

Website | Odysee | Substack | X/Twitter | Gab

Don't donate to people who present as nationalist activists, no matter how much you like them, or how interesting their media content is. I mean donations that provide them with personal income.

Did you know that the BNP still exists? Apparently, it has a substantial nest-egg built up from bequests from deceased members. It produces a newspaper but is inactive in politics. The nest-egg provides the people who control it with a livelihood. That's pretty stunning when you think about it! I wonder if any of the bequesters imagined such an outcome.

But I've come around to the view that it is almost inevitable, rather than an anomaly, given the incentives and disincentives.

It IS possible for ordinary, outward-facing nationalists to have an income that has nothing to do with their politics, such as having independent means, or passive/online income, or taking a job below their abilities and skills. It might mean that one can't live comfortably, but at least one isn't tempted to lie.

Lies such as that your media production is an educational service. That your viewers are getting a sense of solidarity and comradeship. That you are enabling them to "do their bit"... by donating to you, and thus indulging their cowardice as well as your own; a conspiracy of faked virtue.

This has nothing to do with how likeable such people are. I can only think of two that don't do this, and I can't say I like either of them, for unpolitical reasons.

Midnight snacking.

As I've said before, I don't use social media, unless you count Telegram. Anyway, I'm aware of how how much personal information many people put on sites such as Facebook. On impulse I thought I'd look up someone I went to school with. There were literally dozens with the same name even within the same country; seems like every man and his dog. So I added one or two details to my search and one particular entry popped up, with many photographs, none of which I recognized - just some "boomer." But when I looked at education details, both his high school and year of graduation is the same as mine. Bingo.

It still surprises me how very very few of this channel's subscribers have ever forwarded prisoner contact details to add to our database. As my previous message describes, it's trivially easy to find them out if you have even a little bit of personal info about them.

Being surprised is a welcome phenomenon - I believe it is a sign of neuro-plasticity. I recall how much, during the late 20th century, people would talk about the year 2000 as a great milestone, when we would certainly be living and working on the Moon, would have flying cars and fusion energy. I'm surprised none of those things panned out.

It's a funny thing, the question of the restriction of speech. I could live under a regime of either total free speech, OR prohibition of ANY speech that hurts ANYONE's feelings, or anything in between, as long as it is impartially applied. Just tell me the rules! Impartiality is a necessary feature of any directive that purports to be a principle, or to be just. What I find utterly intolerable, loathsome and contemptible, is the selective application of such rules to "protected groups" that happen to be politically influential or who are a proxy, a club used to beat us over the head, of groups with a political agenda, while we are lectured about morality, principles and justice. Make fun of, say, some random fat person and nothing will happen, but make fun of a fat lesbian politician and suddenly the state prosecutor gets involved!

As a rejected applicant to join Homeland, it doesn't look like I missed anything! 🤣

Imagine starting a political party with the sole intention of bringing about remigration, then announcing that you won’t be standing any parliamentary candidates for TWO DECADES. This would mean contesting Westminster constituencies not in 2029, but in 2044!

By 2044, White British children will be a minority in schools (currently 61.3 per cent), White British births will be a minority in maternity wards (currently 55.6 per cent) and overall, White British people will make up less than 60 per cent of the population (currently White Brits around 70 per cent).

The ONLY way to bring about remigration is to form a government by winning a parliamentary majority – to believe this would be possible in 2044 after another 19 years of mass migration, high migrant birth rates, critically low White British birth rates and a large number of elderly White British people dying off is pure fantasy.

Regarding the above prisoner just re;eased.