Forwarded from Mark Collett
UPDATE on Political Prisoner Sven Longshanks AKA James Allchurch
Sven has been sent to HMP Berwyn which is Category C prison. He is in good spirits and says the building is more attractive and he has a view of a meadow outside his window. Please keep writing to him, but at this new address:
NAME: James Allchurch
PRISONER NUMBER: A5903EY
ADDRESS: HMP Berwyn, Bridge Road, Wrexham Ind. Est., Wrexham, LL139QS.
Sven has been sent to HMP Berwyn which is Category C prison. He is in good spirits and says the building is more attractive and he has a view of a meadow outside his window. Please keep writing to him, but at this new address:
NAME: James Allchurch
PRISONER NUMBER: A5903EY
ADDRESS: HMP Berwyn, Bridge Road, Wrexham Ind. Est., Wrexham, LL139QS.
❤4👍1
I saw several deer tonight , not far from last night's sighting. The lighting was better and I saw that they were pale. I know just the shortcut they likely took into the forest, so I shall wait tomorrow beside the track with camera ready.
Ever met someone who is only concerned with your tone and is oblivious to the content of what you're saying? Is that infuriating or what?
People might note that Sven seems OK with his new accommodation but instead they will lose it over your attitude.
People might note that any bureaucratic harassment of Sven is clearly unjustified, even if you the supporter were evil incarnate, and grounds for an appeal (you'd think) but instead will go ballistic at you for 'endangering' him?
People might note that Sven seems OK with his new accommodation but instead they will lose it over your attitude.
People might note that any bureaucratic harassment of Sven is clearly unjustified, even if you the supporter were evil incarnate, and grounds for an appeal (you'd think) but instead will go ballistic at you for 'endangering' him?
I recently received a letter from Vincent in which he discusses two matters. He doesn't appear to need anything.
The first matter is that a 'new' guard (meaning both young and a recent recruit) assigned to open Vincent's parcels is messing him around:
It seems that the reason Vincent has been able to receive books from anywhere is that the guards have been easy-going about enforcing the rules, namely that Blackwell's is the only authorized supplier of books. Similarly, a parcel of art supplies was mostly withheld by this guard. However, another guard is going to try to get the books and supplies released.
The second matter is the progress of Vincent's case:
His lawyer thinks that the second arrest warrant could be dropped on the 9th of December. You will recall that at this point the second arrest warrant (for his videos) is what will get him extradited, the first having been dealt with. Also, his next, appeal hearing is in January-February. What is special about the 9th of December is that it is when he will have served prison time in the UK the same as what he would have been sentenced to in France. Vincent is not sure the lawyer is right. In any case, Vincent says he would prefer not to be released on 9th of December but instead to have his hearing in January-February. This is because he wants the judge to invalidate the Sherriff's decision to extradite him because (the Sherriff decided) Vincent had committed an illegal act in the UK. Vincent wants that decision overturned in order to preserve freedom of speech in the UK. I'm not sure, but I think he means that the Sherriff's decision affirms that Holocaust denial is illegal in the UK. Vincent is saying that he wants that judgement overturned, more than his own freedom.
The first matter is that a 'new' guard (meaning both young and a recent recruit) assigned to open Vincent's parcels is messing him around:
It seems that the reason Vincent has been able to receive books from anywhere is that the guards have been easy-going about enforcing the rules, namely that Blackwell's is the only authorized supplier of books. Similarly, a parcel of art supplies was mostly withheld by this guard. However, another guard is going to try to get the books and supplies released.
The second matter is the progress of Vincent's case:
His lawyer thinks that the second arrest warrant could be dropped on the 9th of December. You will recall that at this point the second arrest warrant (for his videos) is what will get him extradited, the first having been dealt with. Also, his next, appeal hearing is in January-February. What is special about the 9th of December is that it is when he will have served prison time in the UK the same as what he would have been sentenced to in France. Vincent is not sure the lawyer is right. In any case, Vincent says he would prefer not to be released on 9th of December but instead to have his hearing in January-February. This is because he wants the judge to invalidate the Sherriff's decision to extradite him because (the Sherriff decided) Vincent had committed an illegal act in the UK. Vincent wants that decision overturned in order to preserve freedom of speech in the UK. I'm not sure, but I think he means that the Sherriff's decision affirms that Holocaust denial is illegal in the UK. Vincent is saying that he wants that judgement overturned, more than his own freedom.
👍1
I had a look at the webpage of Friends of Al-Aqsa (FOA), the organizers of an ostensibly pro-Palestine demo in London on the 11th of November, which also happens to be Remembrance Day. Interesting!
They have three arabic-looking people fronting it.
Hat tip to Warren Balogh for clarifying the political categories surrounding the conflict.
Israel is not an apartheid state. It is an genocidal/exterminationist state. Israel wants to be completely rid of the Palestinians by whatever means.
Israel is not a colonial power (i.e., a power based on extraction of economic resources) because the state of Israel is not a colony of the jews. The western world (approximately the G7) is the jews' colony. The jews' colonial administration of the western world is what is commonly called "ZOG."
The two-state solution IS apartheid but is nowhere mentioned by FOA. Separation of peoples into sovereign states is the solution to the world's major problems, and not just in Palestine.
However, the two-state solution is based on the premise that peoples are often irreconcilably different and that they can exist harmoniously only by separation, each with their own secure borders, governments and militaries.
The two-state solution is fundamentally racist, and therefore is (evidently) anathema to FOA without their even spelling it out.
BDS and boycotts are no more useful in resolving the conflict than trying to teach a pig to sing: It won't work and it just annoys the pig.
It seems to me that the FOA stance is not conducive to bringing about peace, but that it would prolong the conflict because it cannot address the underlying problem.
FOAS's stance, just like in South Africa, is a recipe for eternal war, destruction and misery. Either they understand this and they are evil, or they don't understand and they are stupid.
They have three arabic-looking people fronting it.
Hat tip to Warren Balogh for clarifying the political categories surrounding the conflict.
Israel is not an apartheid state. It is an genocidal/exterminationist state. Israel wants to be completely rid of the Palestinians by whatever means.
Israel is not a colonial power (i.e., a power based on extraction of economic resources) because the state of Israel is not a colony of the jews. The western world (approximately the G7) is the jews' colony. The jews' colonial administration of the western world is what is commonly called "ZOG."
The two-state solution IS apartheid but is nowhere mentioned by FOA. Separation of peoples into sovereign states is the solution to the world's major problems, and not just in Palestine.
However, the two-state solution is based on the premise that peoples are often irreconcilably different and that they can exist harmoniously only by separation, each with their own secure borders, governments and militaries.
The two-state solution is fundamentally racist, and therefore is (evidently) anathema to FOA without their even spelling it out.
BDS and boycotts are no more useful in resolving the conflict than trying to teach a pig to sing: It won't work and it just annoys the pig.
It seems to me that the FOA stance is not conducive to bringing about peace, but that it would prolong the conflict because it cannot address the underlying problem.
FOAS's stance, just like in South Africa, is a recipe for eternal war, destruction and misery. Either they understand this and they are evil, or they don't understand and they are stupid.
"Thought Crime" Prisoners' Penpals UK
Time for my deer date. 😊
I decided to wander instead of lurking in the soggy blackberry bushes and THEY found me and yet again I didn't have the camera ready. They are indeed pale and move like lightning, with a big silvery one leaping like a gazelle. I don't understand why they are coming into suburban areas, the communal gardens between blocks of apartments.
Having sprung and run off they seem unlikely to reappear in the same small area so I'll try again in an hour or two when there is almost no traffic and a dead time.
Having sprung and run off they seem unlikely to reappear in the same small area so I'll try again in an hour or two when there is almost no traffic and a dead time.
One doesn't need fire in order to have a revolution. However, one does need a sound framework and strategy, like the NSDAP had. One doesn't need chaos in order to have a revolution, and indeed, the Waffen SS was a harmonious alliance towards a common goal, not unlike the First Crusade. An even better example is the peaceful transition when the parallel government structure that the NSDAP had constructed was slotted into place after Hitler became Chancellor.
👍1
Also see the Fash the Nation deep dive on the jewish influence on the Kuomintang.
Forwarded from Tony 🇮🇹
China has an aging population and a decline in birthrates. Absolutely zero talk of needing to import foreigners to replace their own population. Demographically replacing indigenous Whites is strictly a policy of the Western Ziosphere except in Zionist israel itself.
Our Western Jewish oligarchs would love to see China diversified, but China is Nationalist. As soon as China published their statistics showing a birthrate decline, The Economist wrote China needs foreign workers. So why won’t it embrace immigration? Opposition to multiculturalism is fuelled, in part, by claims of racial purity.
China isn’t stupid, we’re stupid. They understand the importance of racial and cultural homogeneity, we don’t. They understand demographics is destiny, we don’t. They don’t allow Jews to destabilize and subvert their country, we do. The Chinese will exist forever, Whites won’t.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/xi-says-chinas-women-must-start-new-trend-family-2023-10-30/
Our Western Jewish oligarchs would love to see China diversified, but China is Nationalist. As soon as China published their statistics showing a birthrate decline, The Economist wrote China needs foreign workers. So why won’t it embrace immigration? Opposition to multiculturalism is fuelled, in part, by claims of racial purity.
China isn’t stupid, we’re stupid. They understand the importance of racial and cultural homogeneity, we don’t. They understand demographics is destiny, we don’t. They don’t allow Jews to destabilize and subvert their country, we do. The Chinese will exist forever, Whites won’t.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/xi-says-chinas-women-must-start-new-trend-family-2023-10-30/
Reuters
Xi says China's women must start 'new trend of family'
Chinese President Xi Jinping said women have a critical role and must establish a "new trend of family", as the nation grapples with an ageing population and record decline in the birth rate.
Forwarded from Gregory Conte
Poisoning the Well. Jews block a highway in Durham as part of a "anti-war" rally.
This is a typical Jewish trick. They make the most unappealing and insane presentation of an anti-war argument to ensure that the anti-war position does not gain support.
Waiting in traffic is infuriating. Normal people hate anyone who forces them to sit in traffic for 3 or 4 hours.
I hope everyone in Durham realizes that Jews did this.
https://twitter.com/skyoutbriout/status/1720186194875548127
This is a typical Jewish trick. They make the most unappealing and insane presentation of an anti-war argument to ensure that the anti-war position does not gain support.
Waiting in traffic is infuriating. Normal people hate anyone who forces them to sit in traffic for 3 or 4 hours.
I hope everyone in Durham realizes that Jews did this.
https://twitter.com/skyoutbriout/status/1720186194875548127
^^^ Similarly I wonder about the upcoming "pro-Palestine" demo on Remembrance Day, seemingly calculated to make everyone hate the Palestinians.
See, cucking on calling them zionists rather than jews is a never-ending slide towards complete silence.
Forwarded from Striker Unfiltered 🇵🇸
Speech laws outlawing criticism of Zionism are already sailing through parliaments across Europe.
https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1720362605532140001?s=20
https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1720362605532140001?s=20
The way ahead is:
Civil disobedience.
"Calling out" the bullies.
Saying "fuck you" to one's oppressors.
Civil disobedience.
"Calling out" the bullies.
Saying "fuck you" to one's oppressors.
Forwarded from Thomas Sewell (Censored)
https://www.9news.com.au/national/infringement-notices-after-men-take-down-israel-hostage-posters-at-bondi/81353ad7-63d3-491a-83f5-58385331c920
White Australians put up sticky paper = Arrest.
Jews put up sticky paper = State sponsored.
Arabs take down jew sticky paper = Arrest.
So we get arrested and raided for putting up sticky paper, but jews don't, then Arabs get arrested for taking down sticky paper, because jews put it up.
The media and police pretend like psychopathic liars that we aren't being politically persecuted, that we are being charged purely for "criminal damage". But suddenly sticky paper isn't "criminal damage" when jews do it.
On the Joel and Blair show on Thursday Jacob and I covered this judgement concept. How two groups can do or say the same thing but if one puts a negative judgement on the act or fact it's suddenly criminal or misinformation, e.g: replacement migration.
White Australians put up sticky paper = Arrest.
Jews put up sticky paper = State sponsored.
Arabs take down jew sticky paper = Arrest.
So we get arrested and raided for putting up sticky paper, but jews don't, then Arabs get arrested for taking down sticky paper, because jews put it up.
The media and police pretend like psychopathic liars that we aren't being politically persecuted, that we are being charged purely for "criminal damage". But suddenly sticky paper isn't "criminal damage" when jews do it.
On the Joel and Blair show on Thursday Jacob and I covered this judgement concept. How two groups can do or say the same thing but if one puts a negative judgement on the act or fact it's suddenly criminal or misinformation, e.g: replacement migration.
9News
Men fined for taking down posters of Israeli hostages at Bondi
Two men have been fined after allegedly taking down posters depicting Israeli hostages of Hamas displayed at Bondi Beach in Sydney.
Forwarded from Traditional Britain Group
Another young man, effectively a child (16) arrested and now jailed for seven years (!) for sharing documents including (BBC) "two charges of sharing instructions for the use of items that could be used to perform acts of terrorism, including smoke grenades". They're going overboard identifying people in Telegram chats, inflating terrorism statistics. Don't download or share anything they can link with a potentially offensive use. Smoke grenades FGS!
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-wiltshire-67309172
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-wiltshire-67309172
BBC News
A-level student guilty of terror offences detained for seven years
Malakai Wheeler, 18, from Swindon, shared weapons manuals and terrorism documents online.
Just rolling some ideas around:
At some 'meta' level of commentary, usually just one level up, one can say anything legally.
Commentary can be in the form of essays, speeches, songs and graphic art.
To illustrate:
The government passes law 'A' making statement 'B' a jailable offence.
That means that if you sing a song containing B then you go to jail.
But if you sing a song satirising A, or make a speech ridiculing A, then you have not broken any law.
Nevertheless, the song or speech is not merely a critique of A, but it undermines the intentions of, and discredits the proponents of, A. That's because it has people thinking about B as well as A, and the specious and self-serving reasons for silencing people about it. Of course, you would need to be mindful of not stepping on some other speech prohibition.
At some 'meta' level of commentary, usually just one level up, one can say anything legally.
Commentary can be in the form of essays, speeches, songs and graphic art.
To illustrate:
The government passes law 'A' making statement 'B' a jailable offence.
That means that if you sing a song containing B then you go to jail.
But if you sing a song satirising A, or make a speech ridiculing A, then you have not broken any law.
Nevertheless, the song or speech is not merely a critique of A, but it undermines the intentions of, and discredits the proponents of, A. That's because it has people thinking about B as well as A, and the specious and self-serving reasons for silencing people about it. Of course, you would need to be mindful of not stepping on some other speech prohibition.
Seems to me: Any preferential treatment of jews or pakistanis by the police would be fair game for satire. It doesn't have to be very good satire. Most songs are extremely simple as narrative, but have musical components that drive them in and make them memorable.