"Thought Crime" Prisoners' Penpals UK
145 subscribers
70 photos
11 videos
19 files
159 links
Download Telegram
It's a funny thing, the question of the restriction of speech. I could live under a regime of either total free speech, OR prohibition of ANY speech that hurts ANYONE's feelings, or anything in between, as long as it is impartially applied. Just tell me the rules! Impartiality is a necessary feature of any directive that purports to be a principle, or to be just. What I find utterly intolerable, loathsome and contemptible, is the selective application of such rules to "protected groups" that happen to be politically influential or who are a proxy, a club used to beat us over the head, of groups with a political agenda, while we are lectured about morality, principles and justice. Make fun of, say, some random fat person and nothing will happen, but make fun of a fat lesbian politician and suddenly the state prosecutor gets involved!
As a rejected applicant to join Homeland, it doesn't look like I missed anything! 🀣
Forwarded from Mark Collett
Imagine starting a political party with the sole intention of bringing about remigration, then announcing that you won’t be standing any parliamentary candidates for TWO DECADES. This would mean contesting Westminster constituencies not in 2029, but in 2044!

By 2044, White British children will be a minority in schools (currently 61.3 per cent), White British births will be a minority in maternity wards (currently 55.6 per cent) and overall, White British people will make up less than 60 per cent of the population (currently White Brits around 70 per cent).

The ONLY way to bring about remigration is to form a government by winning a parliamentary majority – to believe this would be possible in 2044 after another 19 years of mass migration, high migrant birth rates, critically low White British birth rates and a large number of elderly White British people dying off is pure fantasy.
Regarding the above prisoner just re;eased.
Forwarded from Nathan Damigo
The amount of support Goodwin is owed by us is substantial. He spent seven years in prison for fending off an attack by anti-White terrorist who assaulted an old man with metal pipes, striking him in the head several times. Goodwin and others came to his rescue and were thrown in prison for years as a result. This man is owed a good financial start to help him pick his life back up after the injustice he was dealt.
πŸ‘2
So what I learned from this project, without naming names, is that there is no solidarity among the prisoners I communicated with. Basically, it is every man for himself. It's an ugly truth but there it is. Where does one go from here?