As I've said before, I don't use social media, unless you count Telegram. Anyway, I'm aware of how how much personal information many people put on sites such as Facebook. On impulse I thought I'd look up someone I went to school with. There were literally dozens with the same name even within the same country; seems like every man and his dog. So I added one or two details to my search and one particular entry popped up, with many photographs, none of which I recognized - just some "boomer." But when I looked at education details, both his high school and year of graduation is the same as mine. Bingo.

It still surprises me how very very few of this channel's subscribers have ever forwarded prisoner contact details to add to our database. As my previous message describes, it's trivially easy to find them out if you have even a little bit of personal info about them.

Being surprised is a welcome phenomenon - I believe it is a sign of neuro-plasticity. I recall how much, during the late 20th century, people would talk about the year 2000 as a great milestone, when we would certainly be living and working on the Moon, would have flying cars and fusion energy. I'm surprised none of those things panned out.

It's a funny thing, the question of the restriction of speech. I could live under a regime of either total free speech, OR prohibition of ANY speech that hurts ANYONE's feelings, or anything in between, as long as it is impartially applied. Just tell me the rules! Impartiality is a necessary feature of any directive that purports to be a principle, or to be just. What I find utterly intolerable, loathsome and contemptible, is the selective application of such rules to "protected groups" that happen to be politically influential or who are a proxy, a club used to beat us over the head, of groups with a political agenda, while we are lectured about morality, principles and justice. Make fun of, say, some random fat person and nothing will happen, but make fun of a fat lesbian politician and suddenly the state prosecutor gets involved!

As a rejected applicant to join Homeland, it doesn't look like I missed anything! 🤣

Imagine starting a political party with the sole intention of bringing about remigration, then announcing that you won’t be standing any parliamentary candidates for TWO DECADES. This would mean contesting Westminster constituencies not in 2029, but in 2044!

By 2044, White British children will be a minority in schools (currently 61.3 per cent), White British births will be a minority in maternity wards (currently 55.6 per cent) and overall, White British people will make up less than 60 per cent of the population (currently White Brits around 70 per cent).

The ONLY way to bring about remigration is to form a government by winning a parliamentary majority – to believe this would be possible in 2044 after another 19 years of mass migration, high migrant birth rates, critically low White British birth rates and a large number of elderly White British people dying off is pure fantasy.

Regarding the above prisoner just re;eased.

The amount of support Goodwin is owed by us is substantial. He spent seven years in prison for fending off an attack by anti-White terrorist who assaulted an old man with metal pipes, striking him in the head several times. Goodwin and others came to his rescue and were thrown in prison for years as a result. This man is owed a good financial start to help him pick his life back up after the injustice he was dealt.

So what I learned from this project, without naming names, is that there is no solidarity among the prisoners I communicated with. Basically, it is every man for himself. It's an ugly truth but there it is. Where does one go from here?