"Thought Crime" Prisoners' Penpals UK
Time for my deer date. 😊
I decided to wander instead of lurking in the soggy blackberry bushes and THEY found me and yet again I didn't have the camera ready. They are indeed pale and move like lightning, with a big silvery one leaping like a gazelle. I don't understand why they are coming into suburban areas, the communal gardens between blocks of apartments.
Having sprung and run off they seem unlikely to reappear in the same small area so I'll try again in an hour or two when there is almost no traffic and a dead time.
Having sprung and run off they seem unlikely to reappear in the same small area so I'll try again in an hour or two when there is almost no traffic and a dead time.
One doesn't need fire in order to have a revolution. However, one does need a sound framework and strategy, like the NSDAP had. One doesn't need chaos in order to have a revolution, and indeed, the Waffen SS was a harmonious alliance towards a common goal, not unlike the First Crusade. An even better example is the peaceful transition when the parallel government structure that the NSDAP had constructed was slotted into place after Hitler became Chancellor.
👍1
Also see the Fash the Nation deep dive on the jewish influence on the Kuomintang.
Forwarded from Tony 🇮🇹
China has an aging population and a decline in birthrates. Absolutely zero talk of needing to import foreigners to replace their own population. Demographically replacing indigenous Whites is strictly a policy of the Western Ziosphere except in Zionist israel itself.
Our Western Jewish oligarchs would love to see China diversified, but China is Nationalist. As soon as China published their statistics showing a birthrate decline, The Economist wrote China needs foreign workers. So why won’t it embrace immigration? Opposition to multiculturalism is fuelled, in part, by claims of racial purity.
China isn’t stupid, we’re stupid. They understand the importance of racial and cultural homogeneity, we don’t. They understand demographics is destiny, we don’t. They don’t allow Jews to destabilize and subvert their country, we do. The Chinese will exist forever, Whites won’t.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/xi-says-chinas-women-must-start-new-trend-family-2023-10-30/
Our Western Jewish oligarchs would love to see China diversified, but China is Nationalist. As soon as China published their statistics showing a birthrate decline, The Economist wrote China needs foreign workers. So why won’t it embrace immigration? Opposition to multiculturalism is fuelled, in part, by claims of racial purity.
China isn’t stupid, we’re stupid. They understand the importance of racial and cultural homogeneity, we don’t. They understand demographics is destiny, we don’t. They don’t allow Jews to destabilize and subvert their country, we do. The Chinese will exist forever, Whites won’t.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/xi-says-chinas-women-must-start-new-trend-family-2023-10-30/
Reuters
Xi says China's women must start 'new trend of family'
Chinese President Xi Jinping said women have a critical role and must establish a "new trend of family", as the nation grapples with an ageing population and record decline in the birth rate.
Forwarded from Gregory Conte
Poisoning the Well. Jews block a highway in Durham as part of a "anti-war" rally.
This is a typical Jewish trick. They make the most unappealing and insane presentation of an anti-war argument to ensure that the anti-war position does not gain support.
Waiting in traffic is infuriating. Normal people hate anyone who forces them to sit in traffic for 3 or 4 hours.
I hope everyone in Durham realizes that Jews did this.
https://twitter.com/skyoutbriout/status/1720186194875548127
This is a typical Jewish trick. They make the most unappealing and insane presentation of an anti-war argument to ensure that the anti-war position does not gain support.
Waiting in traffic is infuriating. Normal people hate anyone who forces them to sit in traffic for 3 or 4 hours.
I hope everyone in Durham realizes that Jews did this.
https://twitter.com/skyoutbriout/status/1720186194875548127
^^^ Similarly I wonder about the upcoming "pro-Palestine" demo on Remembrance Day, seemingly calculated to make everyone hate the Palestinians.
See, cucking on calling them zionists rather than jews is a never-ending slide towards complete silence.
Forwarded from Striker Unfiltered 🇵🇸
Speech laws outlawing criticism of Zionism are already sailing through parliaments across Europe.
https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1720362605532140001?s=20
https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1720362605532140001?s=20
The way ahead is:
Civil disobedience.
"Calling out" the bullies.
Saying "fuck you" to one's oppressors.
Civil disobedience.
"Calling out" the bullies.
Saying "fuck you" to one's oppressors.
Forwarded from Thomas Sewell (Censored)
https://www.9news.com.au/national/infringement-notices-after-men-take-down-israel-hostage-posters-at-bondi/81353ad7-63d3-491a-83f5-58385331c920
White Australians put up sticky paper = Arrest.
Jews put up sticky paper = State sponsored.
Arabs take down jew sticky paper = Arrest.
So we get arrested and raided for putting up sticky paper, but jews don't, then Arabs get arrested for taking down sticky paper, because jews put it up.
The media and police pretend like psychopathic liars that we aren't being politically persecuted, that we are being charged purely for "criminal damage". But suddenly sticky paper isn't "criminal damage" when jews do it.
On the Joel and Blair show on Thursday Jacob and I covered this judgement concept. How two groups can do or say the same thing but if one puts a negative judgement on the act or fact it's suddenly criminal or misinformation, e.g: replacement migration.
White Australians put up sticky paper = Arrest.
Jews put up sticky paper = State sponsored.
Arabs take down jew sticky paper = Arrest.
So we get arrested and raided for putting up sticky paper, but jews don't, then Arabs get arrested for taking down sticky paper, because jews put it up.
The media and police pretend like psychopathic liars that we aren't being politically persecuted, that we are being charged purely for "criminal damage". But suddenly sticky paper isn't "criminal damage" when jews do it.
On the Joel and Blair show on Thursday Jacob and I covered this judgement concept. How two groups can do or say the same thing but if one puts a negative judgement on the act or fact it's suddenly criminal or misinformation, e.g: replacement migration.
9News
Men fined for taking down posters of Israeli hostages at Bondi
Two men have been fined after allegedly taking down posters depicting Israeli hostages of Hamas displayed at Bondi Beach in Sydney.
Forwarded from Traditional Britain Group
Another young man, effectively a child (16) arrested and now jailed for seven years (!) for sharing documents including (BBC) "two charges of sharing instructions for the use of items that could be used to perform acts of terrorism, including smoke grenades". They're going overboard identifying people in Telegram chats, inflating terrorism statistics. Don't download or share anything they can link with a potentially offensive use. Smoke grenades FGS!
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-wiltshire-67309172
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-wiltshire-67309172
BBC News
A-level student guilty of terror offences detained for seven years
Malakai Wheeler, 18, from Swindon, shared weapons manuals and terrorism documents online.
Just rolling some ideas around:
At some 'meta' level of commentary, usually just one level up, one can say anything legally.
Commentary can be in the form of essays, speeches, songs and graphic art.
To illustrate:
The government passes law 'A' making statement 'B' a jailable offence.
That means that if you sing a song containing B then you go to jail.
But if you sing a song satirising A, or make a speech ridiculing A, then you have not broken any law.
Nevertheless, the song or speech is not merely a critique of A, but it undermines the intentions of, and discredits the proponents of, A. That's because it has people thinking about B as well as A, and the specious and self-serving reasons for silencing people about it. Of course, you would need to be mindful of not stepping on some other speech prohibition.
At some 'meta' level of commentary, usually just one level up, one can say anything legally.
Commentary can be in the form of essays, speeches, songs and graphic art.
To illustrate:
The government passes law 'A' making statement 'B' a jailable offence.
That means that if you sing a song containing B then you go to jail.
But if you sing a song satirising A, or make a speech ridiculing A, then you have not broken any law.
Nevertheless, the song or speech is not merely a critique of A, but it undermines the intentions of, and discredits the proponents of, A. That's because it has people thinking about B as well as A, and the specious and self-serving reasons for silencing people about it. Of course, you would need to be mindful of not stepping on some other speech prohibition.
Seems to me: Any preferential treatment of jews or pakistanis by the police would be fair game for satire. It doesn't have to be very good satire. Most songs are extremely simple as narrative, but have musical components that drive them in and make them memorable.
Singing outside a prison need not be for the purpose of getting anyone released. Assange will probably die in there. By now it must be clear that we're about more than that. Doing something just for the hell of it in an enjoyable way is sufficient if it serves to get the word out.
"Thought Crime" Prisoners' Penpals UK
Singing outside a prison need not be for the purpose of getting anyone released. Assange will probably die in there. By now it must be clear that we're about more than that. Doing something just for the hell of it in an enjoyable way is sufficient if it serves…
The hegemony of our oppressors depends on limiting our actions to the extent that we are predictable.
Don't be predictable. There is great power in exploratory behaviour, being willing to venture into the unknown. They fear our simple human capacity to try something new. The discovery of the Americas eventually led to "the shot heard around the world" and the overthrow of old regimes. The Chinese curtailed their exploratory voyages because of the threat that the unknown posed to their predictable and therefore controllable social system, and when they eventually came in contact with the west it led to their collapse. The barely controlled Aztec empire went "boom" at the arrival of Cortez. And so on.
Be the agent of chaos that they fear.
Don't be predictable. There is great power in exploratory behaviour, being willing to venture into the unknown. They fear our simple human capacity to try something new. The discovery of the Americas eventually led to "the shot heard around the world" and the overthrow of old regimes. The Chinese curtailed their exploratory voyages because of the threat that the unknown posed to their predictable and therefore controllable social system, and when they eventually came in contact with the west it led to their collapse. The barely controlled Aztec empire went "boom" at the arrival of Cortez. And so on.
Be the agent of chaos that they fear.
👍1
It's Aryan.. to want to see what is beyond that horizon.
❤2👍2👌1
I all seriousness, I prefer The Onion to any MSM. https://www.theonion.com/
The Onion
Home
America's Finest News Source
Forwarded from Mike Peinovich⚡️⚡️🔻
As expected, the Palestine march in DC today is being completely controlled by annoying Jewish women who are claiming there is some intersectional connection between the struggle of Palestinians and the struggle of blacks, gays and trannies in America.
None of this serves Palestinians, nor is it meant to. It is Jewish controlled opposition that is meant to neutralize the Palestine movement and make it safe for jews. All the "official" Palestine orgs in America prioritize jewish comfort and fighting anti-semitism above any concern for Palestinians, or any goals that may actually harm Israel.
You may ask me, but Mike, why do you still support the Palestinians when their movement in America is so Jewish and repugnant? Well, there is Jewish controlled fake pro-White stuff as well, and that doesn't stop me from being pro-White.
None of this serves Palestinians, nor is it meant to. It is Jewish controlled opposition that is meant to neutralize the Palestine movement and make it safe for jews. All the "official" Palestine orgs in America prioritize jewish comfort and fighting anti-semitism above any concern for Palestinians, or any goals that may actually harm Israel.
You may ask me, but Mike, why do you still support the Palestinians when their movement in America is so Jewish and repugnant? Well, there is Jewish controlled fake pro-White stuff as well, and that doesn't stop me from being pro-White.