Court was in session for about 40 minutes and is now adjourned again. The judge stated that his current assessment based upon the videos in which the alleged antisemitic remarks were made, that it does not justify a punishment of the accused. This assessment can change during the course of the hearing. A police officer was called to testify as a defense witness but was unable to because he did not receive permission. Court is now back in session

The police officer defense witness testified. The officer answered questions about his report. It was a very brief testimony. He answered factual questions surrounding the campaign speech from Sept. 24, 2021. He said it was a peaceful and lawful event. We are on a five minute break now. During the next session, we will watch the 90 minute interview Prof. Bhakdi did with Kai Stuht, which contains the statements in question.

Court is back in session

The prosecutor wanted to address how many views, likes and shares the videos received. The defense argues that’s not relevant the judge agrees. The judge will not allow anymore witnesses to be heard. He seems to agree there is sufficient evidence. The prosecutor and defense has 60 minutes to draft their final pleas

Court will resume soon. The prosecution and defense will present their final arguments to Judge Grundmann. Prosecutor Fussinger is not yet in the courtroom.

Prosecutor Silke Fussinger completed her final argument. For the first charge she asked for 90 Euros paid daily for 150 days and for the second charge, she asked for 90 Euros paid daily for 70 days. She summed it up and came to 90 Euros paid daily for 180 days. We are now on a 10 minute break. The defense will deliver its final arguments when court reconvenes.

Court is resuming. The defense will present final arguments.

All three of Prof. Bhakdi's lawyers spoke as part of the final argument to the court. Martin Schwab, Prof. Bhakdi's main lawyer, spoke about Sucharit's conviction in the media before the hearing. He then focused on the two charges. Regarding the charge stemming from Sucharit's interview with Kai Stuht, Schwab stated that Sucharit did not insult Israeli people according to a specific German law. He provided more context to Sucharit's statements in the interview stating that the Israeli people were the first to be injected under the emergency authorization. Schwab reiterated Sucharit was not insulting the Israeli people but expressing concern and worry for them. He said the interpretation of Sucharit's words was completely wrong. Schwab asked for a not guilty verdict. Lawyer Tobias Weissenborn pointed out that Sucharit was not addressing the Israeli people but rather the Israeli government. He mentioned that Sucharit is a Buddhist who advocates for peace and unity. Weissenborn mentioned the prosecutor's shortcomings (not watching the full videos or investigating properly).

Sven Lausen argued that the prosecution misunderstood that Sucharit was speaking at the campaign event as a candidate and that, of course, politicians should have a broader range in what they speak about. Lausen says the prosecutor is dividing people by bringing forth these charges and that she has a duty to evaluate and investigate the evidence, and she did not do so properly. Lausen argued that the prosecutor has the wrong impression because she only watched a portions of the video. He said her 6 page long indictment lacks knowledge. Lausen also said she was requesting access when also saying her investigation was closed on the same day. Prosecutor never said anything about the letter written by the Holocaust victims to the EMA in the indictment and that the indictment was evil and that the prosecutor wanted it make Sucharit an example.

Court is about to resume shortly. Both the defense and prosecution delivered final arguments. The judge then adjourned court for 30 minutes.

Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty in the Plön court in Germany

Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany 🇩🇪

Sucharit Bhakdi

‘There is a heavy presence of support outside the court house. It's raining. Police are here but there are so far no protests. Most people queuing are here to support Sucharit’

Taylor Hudak

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh

🎥

Special Edition of Financial Rebellion with CHD Europe and CHD.TV.

Streaming at 15:00 CET / 14:00 BST

Watch here:

https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/live-stream/

Or here:

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/financial-rebellion-with-catherine-austin-fitts/not-guilty-with-sucharit-bhakdi--taylor-hudak/

Hi all I will be LIVE at 3pm CET to discuss the not guilty verdict of Prof. Bhakdi with Prof. Bhakdi himself! Hosts Catherine Austin Fitts, Carolyn Betts and Polly Tommy will lead the discussion. https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/financial-rebellion-with-catherine-austin-fitts/not-guilty-with-sucharit-bhakdi--taylor-hudak/

‘My Case Was Trivial’: Dr. Bhakdi’s Criminal Charges Took a Backseat to His Concerns About the WHO + the Shots

“I said during the day that I was probably the most relaxed person in court because I was never worried about myself,” professed German microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.

“There were other worries that were so much greater that my personal situation really recedes into — it’s nothing. We’re worried about the WHO. We’re worried about the gene-transforming, so-called vaccinations. Everything else just becomes trivial,” he remarked.

Dr. Bhakdi was acquitted of the two charges against him, incitement of the masses and trivialization of the Holocaust, in only nine hours.

He sent his thanks to the judge and his supporters for saving “the face of honor of German jurisdiction.”

Watch the full episode with Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi on #CHDTV:

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/financial-rebellion-with-catherine-austin-fitts/not-guilty-with-sucharit-bhakdi--taylor-hudak/

Follow @ChildrensHD
Trending News | Donate

Join the new channel for Sucharit Bhakdi Case Updates: https://t.me/Bhakdi_Case

Welcome to the Sucharit Bhakdi Case Updates Telegram group! Here you will find information about the case.

Since 2020, Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi has informed the German and international public about the true nature of COVID-19 and the gene based-vaccines. He has written extensively on the subject and has been featured on several international news channels.

From a period between mid 2021 to early 2022, 4 individuals led complaints with the German authorities against Prof. Bhakdi for statements he made comparing the C19 vaccination program to 1930s/40s Germany. The complainants allege that such statements are a criminal offense.

Prof. Bhakdi was charged with one count of “incitement of the masses” and one count of “trivialization of the Holocaust.”

His court hearing was held on May 23, 2023, at Amtsgericht Plön in which a judge found him not guilty on both counts.

The prosecutor has filed an appeal.

Prof. Bhakdi Case: Footage from the courthouse on May 23, 2023.

BREAKING: I can confirm Prosecutor Füssinger filed an appeal against the not guilty verdict in the Prof. Bhakdi case

There are 2 types of appeals that can be applied in this case.

Following a verdict, the dissatisfied party may file an appeal to either enforce another court hearing in which the discovery of evidence is repeated, this kind of appeal is called “Berufung” in German OR the dissatisfied party may file an appeal to determine if the law was properly applied, this kind of appeal is called “Revision” in German. Regarding the latter, the facts on which the judgment is based are not called into question.

At this time, there is no written judgment in the Prof. Bhakdi case, and as long as there is no written judgment, the party who files an appeal may only decide which type of appeal to pursue until the written judgment is available to both the prosecution and defense. Prosecutor Füssinger has filed an appeal and will decide which appeal to pursue based on the written judgment.