Advance Money Investment: Tax Benefit Confirmed for NHAI Bonds.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible to claim deduction u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act for investment in bonds of the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The assessee had invested the advance money received towards the sale of a property in the specified NHAI bonds before the date of transfer. This is in line with Circular No. 359 and the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT vs. Subhash Vinayak Supnekar, which ruled that when an advance received under an agreement to sell a capital asset is invested in specified bonds, the benefit of Section 54EC is available. The Tribunal observed a direct nexus between the advance received and the investment made, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82745
#TaxDeduction #CapitalGains #IncomeTax #NHAIBonds #54EC - Income Tax
The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible to claim deduction u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act for investment in bonds of the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The assessee had invested the advance money received towards the sale of a property in the specified NHAI bonds before the date of transfer. This is in line with Circular No. 359 and the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT vs. Subhash Vinayak Supnekar, which ruled that when an advance received under an agreement to sell a capital asset is invested in specified bonds, the benefit of Section 54EC is available. The Tribunal observed a direct nexus between the advance received and the investment made, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82745
#TaxDeduction #CapitalGains #IncomeTax #NHAIBonds #54EC - Income Tax
Interest income from disputed FD awaits final court decision on ownership before taxation.
The Appellate Tribunal adjudicated on the issue of addition of interest income and penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The assessee contended that the interest income from a Fixed Deposit (FD) with the State Bank of India never crystallized due to a legal dispute over the ownership of the funds. The Tribunal held that where the ownership itself is in question, the decision to delete the addition becomes questionable. The assessee cannot be permanently excluded from taxation on interest earned from the FD. However, the assessee cannot be taxed on an asset over which it does not have conclusive ownership. The issue of final ownership is yet to be decided by the court. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-adjudicate the taxation of interest in.....
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82746
#LegalDispute #InterestIncome #OwnershipBattle #Taxation #AssessmentOrder #FairTaxation #DueProcess - Income Tax
The Appellate Tribunal adjudicated on the issue of addition of interest income and penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The assessee contended that the interest income from a Fixed Deposit (FD) with the State Bank of India never crystallized due to a legal dispute over the ownership of the funds. The Tribunal held that where the ownership itself is in question, the decision to delete the addition becomes questionable. The assessee cannot be permanently excluded from taxation on interest earned from the FD. However, the assessee cannot be taxed on an asset over which it does not have conclusive ownership. The issue of final ownership is yet to be decided by the court. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-adjudicate the taxation of interest in.....
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82746
#LegalDispute #InterestIncome #OwnershipBattle #Taxation #AssessmentOrder #FairTaxation #DueProcess - Income Tax
Transfer of salary arrears to pension fund: Can tax be deducted at source?
Deduction of tax from salary arrears appropriated for transfer to pension corpus set up under pension regulations. Constitutionality of Explanation to Section 17(2)(ii)(c) of Income Tax Act 1961 and relevant circulars challenged. High Court held the issue identical to previous case, extended liberty to petitioners to make requests for determination of tax deduction rate. Interim injunction to continue till specified date or disposal of representations. For house rent allowance arising from bipartite settlement, same direction applied as the legal position is identical.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82748
#TaxationLaw #PensionRegulations #SalaryArrears #ConstitutionalityChallenge #EmployeeRights - Income Tax
Deduction of tax from salary arrears appropriated for transfer to pension corpus set up under pension regulations. Constitutionality of Explanation to Section 17(2)(ii)(c) of Income Tax Act 1961 and relevant circulars challenged. High Court held the issue identical to previous case, extended liberty to petitioners to make requests for determination of tax deduction rate. Interim injunction to continue till specified date or disposal of representations. For house rent allowance arising from bipartite settlement, same direction applied as the legal position is identical.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82748
#TaxationLaw #PensionRegulations #SalaryArrears #ConstitutionalityChallenge #EmployeeRights - Income Tax
Penalty Deleted for Non-Furnishing Evidence, Not Concealment of Income.
The assessee was penalized u/s 271(1)(c) for addition of sale consideration due to lack of vouchers. The CIT(A) partly confirmed the addition for want of vouchers. The assessee argued that no penalty is maintainable as the transaction was truly disclosed, and long-term capital gains were reported. The ITAT held that the CIT(A) restricted the addition after examining the evidence, indicating the assessee succeeded partially. The AO imposed the penalty solely for non-submission of supporting vouchers. Relying on the CAFCO SYNDICATE SHIPPING CO. case, the ITAT ruled that penalty cannot be imposed for non-furnishing evidence as it does not amount to concealment of income. Consequently, the penalty levied by the AO was deleted, and the assessee's grounds were allowed.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82747
#TaxPenalty #CapitalGains #DisclosureCompliance #ITATRuling #TaxpayerRelief - Income Tax
The assessee was penalized u/s 271(1)(c) for addition of sale consideration due to lack of vouchers. The CIT(A) partly confirmed the addition for want of vouchers. The assessee argued that no penalty is maintainable as the transaction was truly disclosed, and long-term capital gains were reported. The ITAT held that the CIT(A) restricted the addition after examining the evidence, indicating the assessee succeeded partially. The AO imposed the penalty solely for non-submission of supporting vouchers. Relying on the CAFCO SYNDICATE SHIPPING CO. case, the ITAT ruled that penalty cannot be imposed for non-furnishing evidence as it does not amount to concealment of income. Consequently, the penalty levied by the AO was deleted, and the assessee's grounds were allowed.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82747
#TaxPenalty #CapitalGains #DisclosureCompliance #ITATRuling #TaxpayerRelief - Income Tax
Lack of evidence prevented reopening income tax assessment for alleged bogus share profits.
The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked sufficient material or evidence to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in respect of transactions involving shares of Cubical. The notice u/s 148A(b) and order u/s 148A(d) failed to demonstrate that the AO possessed books of account, documents, or evidence revealing that the assessee's income from Cubical transactions, treated as capital gains, had escaped assessment. The mere allegation of bogus profits from Cubical shares and the tabular statement reflecting figures did not substantiate that the income was undisclosed or a camouflage. Without concrete evidence suggesting the Cubical transactions were bogus, the amount of Rs. 30,71,263/- could not be inclu.....
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82749
#IncomeTax #AssessmentOrder #ShareTransactions #EvidenceRequired #TaxLitigation #IncomeTax - Income Tax
The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked sufficient material or evidence to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in respect of transactions involving shares of Cubical. The notice u/s 148A(b) and order u/s 148A(d) failed to demonstrate that the AO possessed books of account, documents, or evidence revealing that the assessee's income from Cubical transactions, treated as capital gains, had escaped assessment. The mere allegation of bogus profits from Cubical shares and the tabular statement reflecting figures did not substantiate that the income was undisclosed or a camouflage. Without concrete evidence suggesting the Cubical transactions were bogus, the amount of Rs. 30,71,263/- could not be inclu.....
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82749
#IncomeTax #AssessmentOrder #ShareTransactions #EvidenceRequired #TaxLitigation #IncomeTax - Income Tax
Cash incentives accrue on claim submission date, not actual receipt - rules High Court, siding with assessee over tax dept.
The High Court held that cash incentives accrue to the assessee on the date when the application for claim is submitted to the Competent Authority, and not from the date of actual receipt or disbursement of the incentive. This view aligns with the court's earlier decision in a similar case. The reference was decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue authorities regarding the timing of accrual recognition for cash incentives.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82751
#taxlaw #incentives #accrual #revenue #assessee - Income Tax
The High Court held that cash incentives accrue to the assessee on the date when the application for claim is submitted to the Competent Authority, and not from the date of actual receipt or disbursement of the incentive. This view aligns with the court's earlier decision in a similar case. The reference was decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue authorities regarding the timing of accrual recognition for cash incentives.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82751
#taxlaw #incentives #accrual #revenue #assessee - Income Tax
Inherited Property Cost for Capital Gains Tax: Family Settlement Trumps Will.
Capital gains computation - cost of acquisition relates back to date of transfer through will/family settlement to beneficiary. Determination of indexed cost of acquisition for residential property acquired through family settlement. Additional evidence not admissible before ITAT without following rules. Family settlement is not a transfer, cost of acquisition relates back to previous owner's acquisition. Family settlement need not be registered if recording prior arrangement. For capital gains, cost inflation index calculated from year property acquired by previous owner through registered deed. Family arrangement does not involve transfer, hence no capital gains tax. Calculation based on indexed cost from previous owner's acquisition date, even if will disregarded. Order of CIT(A) upheld, decided in favor of assessee.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82750
#FamilySettlement #InheritedProperty #CapitalGainsTax #IndexedCost #TaxationRules - Income Tax
Capital gains computation - cost of acquisition relates back to date of transfer through will/family settlement to beneficiary. Determination of indexed cost of acquisition for residential property acquired through family settlement. Additional evidence not admissible before ITAT without following rules. Family settlement is not a transfer, cost of acquisition relates back to previous owner's acquisition. Family settlement need not be registered if recording prior arrangement. For capital gains, cost inflation index calculated from year property acquired by previous owner through registered deed. Family arrangement does not involve transfer, hence no capital gains tax. Calculation based on indexed cost from previous owner's acquisition date, even if will disregarded. Order of CIT(A) upheld, decided in favor of assessee.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82750
#FamilySettlement #InheritedProperty #CapitalGainsTax #IndexedCost #TaxationRules - Income Tax
Tax evasion scrutiny: Time limits, assessment validity, unexplained income additions upheld.
The key points from the legal text are: Section 153A assessment - Limitation period applies based on when seized materials were handed over to the Assessing Officer (AO), not the search date. Despite 60-day limit in Section 132(9A) for handing over seized assets, non-adherence does not invalidate assessment if within extended limitation u/s 153B(1) proviso. Validity of satisfaction notes u/s 153C - Separate notes recorded for each year, concluding seized materials pertained to assessee and impacted income. Satisfied threshold u/s 153C(1) despite not explicitly mentioning all earlier years. Transfer order u/s 127 - Mixed questions of fact and law involved in determining if consent/consultation requirements were met. No findings recorded due .....
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82752
#TaxLaw #Assessment #LimitationPeriod #Evidence #Compliance #TaxationLitigation #JudicialReview - Income Tax
The key points from the legal text are: Section 153A assessment - Limitation period applies based on when seized materials were handed over to the Assessing Officer (AO), not the search date. Despite 60-day limit in Section 132(9A) for handing over seized assets, non-adherence does not invalidate assessment if within extended limitation u/s 153B(1) proviso. Validity of satisfaction notes u/s 153C - Separate notes recorded for each year, concluding seized materials pertained to assessee and impacted income. Satisfied threshold u/s 153C(1) despite not explicitly mentioning all earlier years. Transfer order u/s 127 - Mixed questions of fact and law involved in determining if consent/consultation requirements were met. No findings recorded due .....
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82752
#TaxLaw #Assessment #LimitationPeriod #Evidence #Compliance #TaxationLitigation #JudicialReview - Income Tax
Loan restructuring costs allowed as business expense for lower interest rate.
Expenditure incurred for payment of foreclosure premium for restructuring loan and obtaining fresh loan at a lower rate of interest is allowable as business expenditure u/s 37(1). The pre-closure premium can be claimed as revenue expenditure u/s 37. The foreclosure of the loan to contain exorbitant charges stems from a business decision and commercial expediency governing the assessee's business dealings. An assessee can decide the best way to conduct business and maximize profits, subject to compliance with the law. The decision in Overseas Sanmar Financial Limited, where foreclosure premium was allowed as business expenditure on similar facts, has attained finality as it was not challenged by the Income-Tax Department. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82753
#BusinessDecision #CommercialExpediency #RevenueExpenditure #LegalPrecedent #JudicialVictory - Income Tax
Expenditure incurred for payment of foreclosure premium for restructuring loan and obtaining fresh loan at a lower rate of interest is allowable as business expenditure u/s 37(1). The pre-closure premium can be claimed as revenue expenditure u/s 37. The foreclosure of the loan to contain exorbitant charges stems from a business decision and commercial expediency governing the assessee's business dealings. An assessee can decide the best way to conduct business and maximize profits, subject to compliance with the law. The decision in Overseas Sanmar Financial Limited, where foreclosure premium was allowed as business expenditure on similar facts, has attained finality as it was not challenged by the Income-Tax Department. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82753
#BusinessDecision #CommercialExpediency #RevenueExpenditure #LegalPrecedent #JudicialVictory - Income Tax
Life Insurance Claim Wrongly Denied - Onus on Insurer to Prove Non-Disclosure.
Insurance claim repudiation is governed by Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938, barring questioning of policies after a stipulated period unless proven by the insurer. The burden rests on the insurer to establish materiality of suppressed facts and insured's knowledge for justifying repudiation. Insurance contracts demand utmost good faith (uberrimae fidei), requiring disclosure of previous policies. Materiality depends on whether prudent insurers would be affected in risk assessment or premium fixation. The insurer failed to provide documentary evidence proving the deceased insured possessed multiple undisclosed policies from other companies. Consequently, the repudiation was held unjustified, and the insurer was directed to pay the claim amounts with interest.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82757
#InsuranceDispute #ContractLaw #GoodFaith #Disclosure #ClaimSettlement - Indian Laws
Insurance claim repudiation is governed by Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938, barring questioning of policies after a stipulated period unless proven by the insurer. The burden rests on the insurer to establish materiality of suppressed facts and insured's knowledge for justifying repudiation. Insurance contracts demand utmost good faith (uberrimae fidei), requiring disclosure of previous policies. Materiality depends on whether prudent insurers would be affected in risk assessment or premium fixation. The insurer failed to provide documentary evidence proving the deceased insured possessed multiple undisclosed policies from other companies. Consequently, the repudiation was held unjustified, and the insurer was directed to pay the claim amounts with interest.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82757
#InsuranceDispute #ContractLaw #GoodFaith #Disclosure #ClaimSettlement - Indian Laws
Utility companies' ancillary services under scrutiny for tax exemption eligibility.
Dispute centered on whether exemption granted for transmission or distribution of electricity extends to ancillary services offered by utility companies. Court ordered stay on penalty proceedings until Supreme Court delivers judgment on exemption applicability to ancillary services. If ruled against assessee, penalty imposition to be independently evaluated based on governing principles. Petitions disposed, maintaining status quo on payments and penalty proceedings pending Supreme Court's final decision.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82754
#TaxDispute #UtilityServices #EnergyLaw #CourtOrder #PendingJudgment #TaxExemption - GST
Dispute centered on whether exemption granted for transmission or distribution of electricity extends to ancillary services offered by utility companies. Court ordered stay on penalty proceedings until Supreme Court delivers judgment on exemption applicability to ancillary services. If ruled against assessee, penalty imposition to be independently evaluated based on governing principles. Petitions disposed, maintaining status quo on payments and penalty proceedings pending Supreme Court's final decision.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82754
#TaxDispute #UtilityServices #EnergyLaw #CourtOrder #PendingJudgment #TaxExemption - GST
Lack of reasoning in court order violates principles of natural justice.
The main order rejecting condonation of delay lacks reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is a well-settled legal position that an affidavit-in-reply cannot supplement the main order under challenge by assigning reasons when the main order itself does not contain any reasons. The Supreme Court has emphasized the need for courts, quasi-judicial, or administrative authorities to provide reasons for their orders to enable higher forums or courts to consider such reasons when the order is challenged. The impugned order dated 12.06.2023, devoid of any reasoning, is liable to be quashed and set aside. Consequently, the matter is remanded back to the respondent to pass a fresh order with detailed reasons in accordance with the law.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82759
#JudicialTransparency #DueProcess #FairHearing #ReasonedjudgmentsMatter #RuleOfLaw - GST
The main order rejecting condonation of delay lacks reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is a well-settled legal position that an affidavit-in-reply cannot supplement the main order under challenge by assigning reasons when the main order itself does not contain any reasons. The Supreme Court has emphasized the need for courts, quasi-judicial, or administrative authorities to provide reasons for their orders to enable higher forums or courts to consider such reasons when the order is challenged. The impugned order dated 12.06.2023, devoid of any reasoning, is liable to be quashed and set aside. Consequently, the matter is remanded back to the respondent to pass a fresh order with detailed reasons in accordance with the law.
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/tmi_highlights_details.asp?id=82759
#JudicialTransparency #DueProcess #FairHearing #ReasonedjudgmentsMatter #RuleOfLaw - GST
Free supply of machine for committed purchase of materials
A customer purchased a machinery as per an agreement as given below Cost Rs. 29,58,000 paid GST Rs. 5,32,440/- and claimed input tax. The output of machinery is fully taxable. After signing agreement the Company gave four commercial credit notes for a total amount of Rs. 29,58,000/- thus effectively making the machinery free of cost. No GST charged or reversed on credit notes issued by supplier. Now the company is buying minimum committed raw materials from the supplier of machinery by paying a... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119379 - GST
A customer purchased a machinery as per an agreement as given below Cost Rs. 29,58,000 paid GST Rs. 5,32,440/- and claimed input tax. The output of machinery is fully taxable. After signing agreement the Company gave four commercial credit notes for a total amount of Rs. 29,58,000/- thus effectively making the machinery free of cost. No GST charged or reversed on credit notes issued by supplier. Now the company is buying minimum committed raw materials from the supplier of machinery by paying a... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119379 - GST
Taxmanagementindia
Free supply of machine for committed purchase of materials, Goods and Services Tax - GST
Discussion Forum An issue, query raised by the member of TMI for reply, post by the experts on TaxTMI on Free supply of machine for committed purchase of materials, Goods and Services Tax -
Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2024
Can the TDS reflected in Form 26AS be adjusted against the tax payable under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) 2024 if the taxpayer has not filed a return and the assessment order under Section 147 has been appealed before the CIT(A)? It is observed that the VSVS form includes fields only for tax payment details (such as challan number and BSR code) but lacks a specific field for TDS credit, raising questions about the eligibility of TDS adjustments in this scenario. Could anyone please clarif... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119376 - Income Tax
Can the TDS reflected in Form 26AS be adjusted against the tax payable under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) 2024 if the taxpayer has not filed a return and the assessment order under Section 147 has been appealed before the CIT(A)? It is observed that the VSVS form includes fields only for tax payment details (such as challan number and BSR code) but lacks a specific field for TDS credit, raising questions about the eligibility of TDS adjustments in this scenario. Could anyone please clarif... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119376 - Income Tax
Taxmanagementindia
Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2024, Income Tax
Discussion Forum An issue, query raised by the member of TMI for reply, post by the experts on TaxTMI on Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2024, Income
GST ON OFFICE
Dear Expert Our Client Entered in to the Agreement in the Month of March-2024 which was duly Registered and O C Received in the Month of Sept-2024. Builder has now raised GST Demand.... is it Correct ? Please Guide - Reply By Sadanand Bulbule - The Reply = Dear Nilesh Was the agreement in March 2024 entered for purchase of office, when there was no OC? The date of sale agreement is crucial here as regards to the applicability of GST. Be specific on facts. - Reply By Shilpi Jain - The Reply = At... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119366 - GST
Dear Expert Our Client Entered in to the Agreement in the Month of March-2024 which was duly Registered and O C Received in the Month of Sept-2024. Builder has now raised GST Demand.... is it Correct ? Please Guide - Reply By Sadanand Bulbule - The Reply = Dear Nilesh Was the agreement in March 2024 entered for purchase of office, when there was no OC? The date of sale agreement is crucial here as regards to the applicability of GST. Be specific on facts. - Reply By Shilpi Jain - The Reply = At... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119366 - GST
Taxmanagementindia
GST ON OFFICE, Goods and Services Tax - GST
Discussion Forum An issue, query raised by the member of TMI for reply, post by the experts on TaxTMI on GST ON OFFICE, Goods and Services Tax -
Classification of cylinder
Whether cylinder manufactured is said to be part and accessories of car or will it fall under specific heading 7311 . I seek experts opinion on the same. - Reply By Sadanand Bulbule - The Reply = Dear Sir It falls under specific entry 7311 : 7311 CONTAINERS FOR COMPRESSED OR LIQUEFIED GAS, OF IRON OR STEEL However specific cylinder manufactured to be part of car falls under HSN 8408 . Plz double check your product and its functionality. - Reply By Sadanand Bulbule - The Reply = Plz refer HSN Ch... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119381 - GST
Whether cylinder manufactured is said to be part and accessories of car or will it fall under specific heading 7311 . I seek experts opinion on the same. - Reply By Sadanand Bulbule - The Reply = Dear Sir It falls under specific entry 7311 : 7311 CONTAINERS FOR COMPRESSED OR LIQUEFIED GAS, OF IRON OR STEEL However specific cylinder manufactured to be part of car falls under HSN 8408 . Plz double check your product and its functionality. - Reply By Sadanand Bulbule - The Reply = Plz refer HSN Ch... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119381 - GST
Taxmanagementindia
Classification of cylinder, Goods and Services Tax - GST
Discussion Forum An issue, query raised by the member of TMI for reply, post by the experts on TaxTMI on Classification of cylinder, Goods and Services Tax -
Government e Marketplace (GeM) launches 170 Seed Categories on the portal
- - - Dated:- 4-11-2024 - On a mission to simplify access to quality agricultural horticulture seeds, Government e Marketplace (GeM) has revamped introduced 170 Seed categories on the portal. Created ahead of the upcoming cropping season, the newly populated categories feature nearly 8,000 seed varieties that can be procured by Central/State PSUs and other governing bodies for further dissemination across the country. Created after consultation with stakeholders including state seed corporation... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/visitor/detail_rss_feed.asp?ID=28066
- - - Dated:- 4-11-2024 - On a mission to simplify access to quality agricultural horticulture seeds, Government e Marketplace (GeM) has revamped introduced 170 Seed categories on the portal. Created ahead of the upcoming cropping season, the newly populated categories feature nearly 8,000 seed varieties that can be procured by Central/State PSUs and other governing bodies for further dissemination across the country. Created after consultation with stakeholders including state seed corporation... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/visitor/detail_rss_feed.asp?ID=28066
FY 2018-2019 GST dues paid with current year 2024-2025 ITC
Sir/Madam, GST Order was issued under section 73 for the year 2018-2019 for mismatch of ITC and I have accepted paid the tax portion using financial year 2024-2025 ITC and will be applying for waiver of Interest and penalty under Amnesty Scheme 2024. Is there any restriction for utilizing current year ITC for past dues. I do not have carry forward of Excess ITC from 2018-2019 till 2023-2024. Please advise. - Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani - The Reply = In my view, there is no one-tow-one correlation... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119367 - GST
Sir/Madam, GST Order was issued under section 73 for the year 2018-2019 for mismatch of ITC and I have accepted paid the tax portion using financial year 2024-2025 ITC and will be applying for waiver of Interest and penalty under Amnesty Scheme 2024. Is there any restriction for utilizing current year ITC for past dues. I do not have carry forward of Excess ITC from 2018-2019 till 2023-2024. Please advise. - Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani - The Reply = In my view, there is no one-tow-one correlation... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119367 - GST
Taxmanagementindia
FY 2018-2019 GST dues paid with current year 2024-2025 ITC, Goods and Services Tax - GST
Discussion Forum An issue, query raised by the member of TMI for reply, post by the experts on TaxTMI on FY 2018-2019 GST dues paid with current year 2024-2025 ITC, Goods and Services Tax -
assessment order
I got an show cause notice on 28.12.2023 u/s 73(1) , had many personal hearing on that and on 30.042024 we get an original order and, on that we filed an appeal on 27.08.2024, the very next day we get an additional order. on original order assessment officer had mistakenly left off to add Flood cess On original order. and now on additional order is under sec 74 without any SCN, or hearing. advise. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Without SCN and without P.H. such additional Adjudication O... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119383 - GST
I got an show cause notice on 28.12.2023 u/s 73(1) , had many personal hearing on that and on 30.042024 we get an original order and, on that we filed an appeal on 27.08.2024, the very next day we get an additional order. on original order assessment officer had mistakenly left off to add Flood cess On original order. and now on additional order is under sec 74 without any SCN, or hearing. advise. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Without SCN and without P.H. such additional Adjudication O... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119383 - GST
Taxmanagementindia
assessment order, Goods and Services Tax - GST
Discussion Forum An issue, query raised by the member of TMI for reply, post by the experts on TaxTMI on assessment order, Goods and Services Tax -
Samples to Customers
Hello experts, My industry is a fashion industry. We make products and send one sample to our distributors for them to see the product and give us orders. The sample sent to distributors are considered as supply? Do i have to raise GST invoice. Please help to clarify. - Reply By Sadanand Bulbule - The Reply = Dear querist Please refer the comprehensive clarification issued under CBIC Circular No. 92/11/2019-GST dated 07/03/2019 for more details. - Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN - The Reply ... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119330 - GST
Hello experts, My industry is a fashion industry. We make products and send one sample to our distributors for them to see the product and give us orders. The sample sent to distributors are considered as supply? Do i have to raise GST invoice. Please help to clarify. - Reply By Sadanand Bulbule - The Reply = Dear querist Please refer the comprehensive clarification issued under CBIC Circular No. 92/11/2019-GST dated 07/03/2019 for more details. - Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN - The Reply ... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119330 - GST
Taxmanagementindia
Samples to Customers, Goods and Services Tax - GST
Discussion Forum An issue, query raised by the member of TMI for reply, post by the experts on TaxTMI on Samples to Customers, Goods and Services Tax -
Cross examination of persons whose statements relied upon by the department
How to reject the plea of the Noticees for cross examination of the witnesses/ persons whose statements relied upon by the department. Relevant judgements to support the denial of cross examination by the Adjudication Authority. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Dear Sir, Pl. let me know the issue in brief. However, one case law is posted here. KIN-SHIP SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA - 2020 (3) TMI 378 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = PARAGON ... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119382 - GST
How to reject the plea of the Noticees for cross examination of the witnesses/ persons whose statements relied upon by the department. Relevant judgements to support the denial of cross examination by the Adjudication Authority. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Dear Sir, Pl. let me know the issue in brief. However, one case law is posted here. KIN-SHIP SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA - 2020 (3) TMI 378 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = PARAGON ... ... ...
Source:
https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/web/View_discussions_detail.asp?ID=119382 - GST
Taxmanagementindia
Cross examination of persons whose statements relied upon by the department, Goods and Services Tax - GST
Discussion Forum An issue, query raised by the member of TMI for reply, post by the experts on TaxTMI on Cross examination of persons whose statements relied upon by the department, Goods and Services Tax -