"State courts retain the authority to apply state constitutional restraints when legislatures act on the power conferred on them by the Elections Clause," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.

An example of JUDICIAL DEFERENCE -
"A court accepts an agency's interpretation of a statute or regulation, even if the court would have arrived at a different interpretation."

Article 1, Section 4 outlines ONLY state Legislatures create the time, place and manner of elections. Congress can set basic standards but cannot regulate the Legislatures.

IT SAYS NOTHING ABOUT COURTS HAVING ANY SAY IN ELECTION PROCEDURES. Their job is to read THE LAW and APPLY IT TO A CASE.

SCOTUS IS NOT IMMUNE TO THE EFFECTS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP STATE"

That was a BULLSHIT ruling. We got screwed with Roberts and Barrett and wtf is Alito thinking, this is a bought and paid for court who defers to ANYTHING BUT the Law as it is written. It is NOT VAGUE in ANY WAY.

EDIT:
ALITO AND THOMAS are our ONLY REAL AMERICANS ON SCOTUS.

I disagree with his advice "don't get angry at them"

No. You need to be angry. Just don't sin.

Sick of having evidence and then it going nowhere bc everyone wants to play NICE and "not be rude"

But please WATCH the above video. Very good work.

Check this out!!

Good stuff!!

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1981/text?q=%7B%22search%22:%5B%22ACE+Act%22%5D%7D&r=1&s=1

Give me your opinion on the above piece of proposed legislation!

Lmao

I'm gonna mess up their statistics

This ruling is good but I'M STILL MAD ABOUT NORTH CAROLINA

yeeee haaaww this Lion just roared !!

https://texasscorecard.com/commentary/we-gave-them-a-chance-they-blew-it/

Yeah, Texas Scorecard.

You're part of the reason those RINOs are there. TXSC threw me under the bus BY NAME and bashed my group for our primary endorsements, told A LOT of good ppl to avoid us and our candidates, who were the ONLY ONES campaigning on election integrity.

Scorecard has good ppl. But it's controlled ultimately by the Machine. I watched it lash out to protect itself from the likes of the TARRANT COUNTY TX SLATE of candidates.

If TXSC wants to play ball with now, they'll have to face the grassroots conservatives they've been stepping on for the last 4 years.

This will be interesting because not one of them will show up to our events to meet candidates. They probably won't host debates. They won't ask hard questions to those they just helped elect, who turned on us.

They'll front, they full of cap, ain't about this lyfe, et cetera... you get the point.

There are some things I'd love to be wrong about. I'd be happy to see that they've changed their ways. Time will tell.

Don't let the media tell you that you're a bad person bc while multiple countries helped look for the Titan, allegedly a boat full of "women" and "children" from Palestine, Afghanistan, Syria, etc, capsized and drowned a bunch of "innocent" "migrants" from the most war torn region of the world.

We have no confirmation that there were ANY women or children on that boat.

Don't let them convince you of anything other than their overall agenda to attack, then demonize their victims, then shame you for hearing about it, as if you 1.) Could do anything (they'll ask for your political support later) and 2.) Don't see thru the velvet lies to the cold, steel truth.

I think a more productive use of time would be for everyone to go and like/share/sub to Texas Scorecard, and comment on how we support their choice to help us clean house.

This can maybe help give them some outward facing support from everyday folks who want election security reforms as part of a true conservative candidate platform.

Tho I think we've been trying this for a while, maybe with Elon our message will not be drowned out so easily.

Until the Supreme Court puts on its big boy and girl pants and does something about corrupt elections, instead of enshrining them, I will continue to believe their “positive” social decisions are intended to stir sh*t and get the left engaged and activated to perpetuate the division.

There, unpopular opinion given.

Ok.

It's been a long few years trying to understand where our elections are at. And there is alot of tension in this movement between almost every group in this movement.

We are inherently free thinkers on this side of the political spectrum, to a fault. It's a gift and a curse upon us.

We are all defensive of our point of view, our work and our strategy. And some ppl are straight up grifters.

Hard to tell them apart since they've adopted ANON culture/slang, but those of us who were there can see them for what they are... usually.

We all need to understand this and show more respect to one another, if we mean to see any measure of success in this movement.

When you don't know someone, default to being open minded but guarded. I know I'm not the only one tired of seeing good ppl trashed while apparent grifters are put on a pedestal for the most basic items they heard from others more involved in the actual work of investigating elections at the ground level.