Forwarded from Taking Back Texas/ Tarrant County TX SLATE (TBTX) (7 HighSeas)
You can report issues with watchers on my website or to the org you are with or here: https://electionobserver.us/monitoring/cgi-bin/home.php and people like me will be providing feedback to your complaints regardless of where you report.
All these groups are building profiles and they need you to report what is happening at the GROUND LEVEL so we can understand and remedy issues of States not following their own laws!
🔥❤🔥
🙏🙏🙏
All these groups are building profiles and they need you to report what is happening at the GROUND LEVEL so we can understand and remedy issues of States not following their own laws!
🔥❤🔥
🙏🙏🙏
electionobserver.us
Election Transparency
Virginia election integrity project.
Yall better go watch Jovan's stream from this morning!
And please forgive him for the Shake Weight segment 😆😆
And please forgive him for the Shake Weight segment 😆😆
Forwarded from Guy Smith
Georgia wants to know if feds behind probe of voter database
Politics, By Kristina Torres, Dec 8, 2016
Secretary of State Brian Kemp has asked federal officials to explain what appears to be an attempt by the U.S. Homeland Security Department to breach Georgia's voter registration database
https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/georgia-wants-know-feds-behind-probe-voter-database/zygtDPvR6iI9ukTE8CiPUI/
——————————————————
The Office of Secretary of State
Brian P. Kemp
SECRETARY OF STATE
December 8,2016
The Honorable Jeh Johnson
Secretary of Homeland Security
Department of Homeland Security
Washington. D.C. 20528
Secretary Johnson,
On November 15, 2016, an IP address associated with the Department of Homeland Security made an unsuccessful attempt to penetrate the Georgia Secretary of State's firewall. I am writing you to ask whether DHS was aware of this attempt and, if so, why DHS was attempting to breach our firewall.
The private-sector security provider that monitors the agency's firewall detected a large unblocked scan event on November 15 at 8.43 AM. The event was an IP address (216.81.81.80) attempting to scan certain aspects of the Georgia Secretary of State's infrastructure. The attempt to breach our system was unsuccessful.
At no time has my office agreed to or permitted DHS to conduct penetration testing or security scans of our network. Moreover, your Department has not contacted my office since this unsuccessful incident to alert us of any security event that would require testing or scanning of our network. This is especially odd and concerning since! serve on the Election Cyber Security Working Group that your office created.
As you may know, the Georgia Secretary of State's office maintains the statewide voter registration data-base containing the personal information of over 6.5 million Georgians. In addition, we hold the information for over 800,000 corporate entities and over 500,000 licensed or registered professionals.
As Georgia's Secretary of State, I take cyber security very seriously. That is why] have contracted with a global leader in monitored security services to provide immediate responses to these types of threats. This firm analyzes more than 180 billion events a day globally across a 5,000+ customer base which includes many Fortune 500 companies. Clearly, this type of resource and service is necessary to protect Georgians' data against the type of event that occurred on November 15.
Georgia was one of the only few states that did net seek DHS assistance with cyber hygiene scans or penetration testing before this year's election. We declined this assistance due to having already implemented the security measures suggested by DHS. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1030, attempting to gain access or exceeding authorized access to protected computer systems is illegal. Given all these facts, a number of very important questions have been raised that deserve your attention:
1. Did your Department in fact conduct this unauthorized scan?
2. If so, who on your staff authorized this scan?
3. Did your Department conduct this type of scan against any other states' systems without authorization?
4. If so, which stags were scanned by DHS without authorization?
I am very concerned by these facts provided by our security services provider, as they raise very serious questions. I would appreciate your prompt and thorough response.
Sincerely,
Brian P. Kemp
CC: US Senate, US Congress
Politics, By Kristina Torres, Dec 8, 2016
Secretary of State Brian Kemp has asked federal officials to explain what appears to be an attempt by the U.S. Homeland Security Department to breach Georgia's voter registration database
https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/georgia-wants-know-feds-behind-probe-voter-database/zygtDPvR6iI9ukTE8CiPUI/
——————————————————
The Office of Secretary of State
Brian P. Kemp
SECRETARY OF STATE
December 8,2016
The Honorable Jeh Johnson
Secretary of Homeland Security
Department of Homeland Security
Washington. D.C. 20528
Secretary Johnson,
On November 15, 2016, an IP address associated with the Department of Homeland Security made an unsuccessful attempt to penetrate the Georgia Secretary of State's firewall. I am writing you to ask whether DHS was aware of this attempt and, if so, why DHS was attempting to breach our firewall.
The private-sector security provider that monitors the agency's firewall detected a large unblocked scan event on November 15 at 8.43 AM. The event was an IP address (216.81.81.80) attempting to scan certain aspects of the Georgia Secretary of State's infrastructure. The attempt to breach our system was unsuccessful.
At no time has my office agreed to or permitted DHS to conduct penetration testing or security scans of our network. Moreover, your Department has not contacted my office since this unsuccessful incident to alert us of any security event that would require testing or scanning of our network. This is especially odd and concerning since! serve on the Election Cyber Security Working Group that your office created.
As you may know, the Georgia Secretary of State's office maintains the statewide voter registration data-base containing the personal information of over 6.5 million Georgians. In addition, we hold the information for over 800,000 corporate entities and over 500,000 licensed or registered professionals.
As Georgia's Secretary of State, I take cyber security very seriously. That is why] have contracted with a global leader in monitored security services to provide immediate responses to these types of threats. This firm analyzes more than 180 billion events a day globally across a 5,000+ customer base which includes many Fortune 500 companies. Clearly, this type of resource and service is necessary to protect Georgians' data against the type of event that occurred on November 15.
Georgia was one of the only few states that did net seek DHS assistance with cyber hygiene scans or penetration testing before this year's election. We declined this assistance due to having already implemented the security measures suggested by DHS. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1030, attempting to gain access or exceeding authorized access to protected computer systems is illegal. Given all these facts, a number of very important questions have been raised that deserve your attention:
1. Did your Department in fact conduct this unauthorized scan?
2. If so, who on your staff authorized this scan?
3. Did your Department conduct this type of scan against any other states' systems without authorization?
4. If so, which stags were scanned by DHS without authorization?
I am very concerned by these facts provided by our security services provider, as they raise very serious questions. I would appreciate your prompt and thorough response.
Sincerely,
Brian P. Kemp
CC: US Senate, US Congress
Forwarded from Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigation
Press Release-
Calling on sheriffs to deputize citizens as election inspectors.
Calling on sheriffs to deputize citizens as election inspectors.
Forwarded from Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigation
⬆️⬆️ This action is authorized under Texas Local Government Code 85.004 "Reserve Deputies"
Please contact your local Sheriff Department and ask if they have a RESERVE DEPUTY program, how many are appointed and the requirements.
Then politely insist that these reserve deputies are activated and deployed during Early Voting and Election Day for the Midterm election.
Also politely insist that more citizens be deputized to observe the midterm election process on behalf of the Sheriffs department for the midterm elections.
85.004. RESERVE DEPUTIES. (a) The commissioners court of a county may authorize the sheriff to appoint reserve deputy sheriffs. The commissioners court may limit the number of reserve deputies that may be appointed.
(b) A reserve deputy serves at the discretion of the sheriff and may be called into service if the sheriff considers it necessary to have additional officers to preserve the peace and enforce the law. The sheriff may authorize a reserve deputy who is a peace officer as described by Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, to carry a weapon or act as a peace officer at all times, regardless of whether the reserve deputy is engaged in the actual discharge of official duties, or may limit the authority of the reserve deputy to carry a weapon or act as a peace officer to only those times during which the reserve deputy is engaged in the actual discharge of official duties. A reserve deputy who is not a peace officer as described by Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, may act as a peace officer only during the actual discharge of official duties. A reserve deputy, regardless of whether the reserve deputy is a peace officer as described by Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, is not:
(1) eligible for participation in any program provided by the county that is normally considered a financial benefit of full-time employment or for any pension fund created by statute for the benefit of full-time paid peace officers; or
(2) exempt from Chapter 1702, Occupations Code.
(c) Except as provided by Subsection (c-1) or (c-2), a reserve deputy, before beginning to perform the duties of office and at the time of appointment, must file an oath and execute and file a bond in the amount of $2,000 payable to the sheriff. The oath and bond shall be filed with the county clerk.
(-1) If a sheriff appoints more than one reserve deputy sheriff, the sheriff may execute a blanket surety bond to cover the reserve deputy sheriffs. Instead of a reserve deputy sheriff executing an individual bond under Subsection (c) or the sheriff executing a blanket surety bond, the county may self-insure against losses that would have been covered by the bond.
(c-2) A person reappointed as a reserve deputy may continue to perform the duties of office before retaking the official oath. The reserve deputy must retake the oath as soon as possible after being reappointed.
(d) A reserve deputy on active duty at the call of the sheriff and actively engaged in assigned duties has the same rights, privileges, and duties as any other peace officer of the state.
(e) The sheriff of a county that borders the Gulf of Mexico may organize some of the reserve deputies to serve as marine reserve deputies and lifeguards for beach and water safety purposes and other related functions as the sheriff may determine. A reserve deputy performing functions under this subsection is subject to the laws of this state that relate to reserve deputies except that they may not carry firearms in the performance of their duties.
(f) An organization formed under Subsection (e) may include both paid and unpaid deputies and reserve deputies. The organization may accept contributions and gifts from foundations, individuals, corporations, and governmental entities, including appropriations by the state on a direct or matching fund basis, to assist the county in providing water safety programs in the interest of the health, safety, and welfare of persons using the coastal water of this state.
Please contact your local Sheriff Department and ask if they have a RESERVE DEPUTY program, how many are appointed and the requirements.
Then politely insist that these reserve deputies are activated and deployed during Early Voting and Election Day for the Midterm election.
Also politely insist that more citizens be deputized to observe the midterm election process on behalf of the Sheriffs department for the midterm elections.
85.004. RESERVE DEPUTIES. (a) The commissioners court of a county may authorize the sheriff to appoint reserve deputy sheriffs. The commissioners court may limit the number of reserve deputies that may be appointed.
(b) A reserve deputy serves at the discretion of the sheriff and may be called into service if the sheriff considers it necessary to have additional officers to preserve the peace and enforce the law. The sheriff may authorize a reserve deputy who is a peace officer as described by Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, to carry a weapon or act as a peace officer at all times, regardless of whether the reserve deputy is engaged in the actual discharge of official duties, or may limit the authority of the reserve deputy to carry a weapon or act as a peace officer to only those times during which the reserve deputy is engaged in the actual discharge of official duties. A reserve deputy who is not a peace officer as described by Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, may act as a peace officer only during the actual discharge of official duties. A reserve deputy, regardless of whether the reserve deputy is a peace officer as described by Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, is not:
(1) eligible for participation in any program provided by the county that is normally considered a financial benefit of full-time employment or for any pension fund created by statute for the benefit of full-time paid peace officers; or
(2) exempt from Chapter 1702, Occupations Code.
(c) Except as provided by Subsection (c-1) or (c-2), a reserve deputy, before beginning to perform the duties of office and at the time of appointment, must file an oath and execute and file a bond in the amount of $2,000 payable to the sheriff. The oath and bond shall be filed with the county clerk.
(-1) If a sheriff appoints more than one reserve deputy sheriff, the sheriff may execute a blanket surety bond to cover the reserve deputy sheriffs. Instead of a reserve deputy sheriff executing an individual bond under Subsection (c) or the sheriff executing a blanket surety bond, the county may self-insure against losses that would have been covered by the bond.
(c-2) A person reappointed as a reserve deputy may continue to perform the duties of office before retaking the official oath. The reserve deputy must retake the oath as soon as possible after being reappointed.
(d) A reserve deputy on active duty at the call of the sheriff and actively engaged in assigned duties has the same rights, privileges, and duties as any other peace officer of the state.
(e) The sheriff of a county that borders the Gulf of Mexico may organize some of the reserve deputies to serve as marine reserve deputies and lifeguards for beach and water safety purposes and other related functions as the sheriff may determine. A reserve deputy performing functions under this subsection is subject to the laws of this state that relate to reserve deputies except that they may not carry firearms in the performance of their duties.
(f) An organization formed under Subsection (e) may include both paid and unpaid deputies and reserve deputies. The organization may accept contributions and gifts from foundations, individuals, corporations, and governmental entities, including appropriations by the state on a direct or matching fund basis, to assist the county in providing water safety programs in the interest of the health, safety, and welfare of persons using the coastal water of this state.
❤1
Forwarded from Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigation
(g) The county or sheriff is not liable, because of the appointment of a reserve deputy, if the reserve deputy incurs personal injury while serving in an official capacity.
For more questions please contact Weston Martinez of the Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigation
For more questions please contact Weston Martinez of the Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigation
Forwarded from Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigation
Ps
The power of the law enforcement Posse is created by the US Constitution
The power of the law enforcement Posse is created by the US Constitution
❤2
Forwarded from Dr. D. Presents
FYI, Matt DePerno and I will be on the Lindell Report with Brannon Howze tonight at 6:00 P.M. CDT.
🔥4
Forwarded from Patrick M. Byrne (Patrick M. Byrne)
ABC News
Trump allies using false election claims, images of war to recruit ex-military as poll workers
An organization founded by two prominent election deniers is recruiting ex-military and first responders to staff polling places during the midterm elections.
👍4❤1
SECURE THE ELECTIONS, PATRIOTS. 🙏🇺🇸❤
❤9
Forwarded from Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigation
https://rumble.com/v1qcyrs-law-enforcement-gets-involved-at-local-polling-stations.html
Please WATCH and SHARE.
Please WATCH and SHARE.
Rumble
Law Enforcement Gets Involved At Local Polling Stations
Weston Martinez is the President of Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigation, and joins April Moss from San Antonio to discuss his efforts to engage local law enforcement to ensure secure elections. ******
👏1
Sec. 276.016. UNLAWFUL SOLICITATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF APPLICATION TO VOTE BY MAIL. (a) A public official or election official commits an offense if the official, while acting in an official capacity, knowingly:
(1) solicits the submission of an application to vote by mail from a person who did not request an application;
(2) distributes an application to vote by mail to a person who did not request the application unless the distribution is expressly authorized by another provision of this code;
(3) authorizes or approves the expenditure of public funds to facilitate third-party distribution of an application to vote by mail to a person who did not request the application; or
(4) completes any portion of an application to vote by mail and distributes the application to an applicant.
(b) An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
(c) Subsection (a)(2) does not apply if the public official or election official engaged in the conduct described by Subsection (a)(2) by providing access to an application to vote by mail from a publicly accessible Internet website.
(d) Subsection (a)(4) does not apply if the public official or election official engaged in the conduct described by Subsection (a)(4) while lawfully assisting the applicant under Section 84.003.
(e) Subsection (a) does not apply if the public official or election official:
(1) provided general information about voting by mail, the vote by mail process, or the timelines associated with voting to a person or the public; or
(2) engaged in the conduct described by Subsection (a) while acting in the official's capacity as a candidate for a public elective office.
(f) The remedy provided under this chapter is cumulative, and does not restrict any other remedies provided by this code or by law. A violation of this section is subject to injunctive relief or mandamus as provided by this code.
(1) solicits the submission of an application to vote by mail from a person who did not request an application;
(2) distributes an application to vote by mail to a person who did not request the application unless the distribution is expressly authorized by another provision of this code;
(3) authorizes or approves the expenditure of public funds to facilitate third-party distribution of an application to vote by mail to a person who did not request the application; or
(4) completes any portion of an application to vote by mail and distributes the application to an applicant.
(b) An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
(c) Subsection (a)(2) does not apply if the public official or election official engaged in the conduct described by Subsection (a)(2) by providing access to an application to vote by mail from a publicly accessible Internet website.
(d) Subsection (a)(4) does not apply if the public official or election official engaged in the conduct described by Subsection (a)(4) while lawfully assisting the applicant under Section 84.003.
(e) Subsection (a) does not apply if the public official or election official:
(1) provided general information about voting by mail, the vote by mail process, or the timelines associated with voting to a person or the public; or
(2) engaged in the conduct described by Subsection (a) while acting in the official's capacity as a candidate for a public elective office.
(f) The remedy provided under this chapter is cumulative, and does not restrict any other remedies provided by this code or by law. A violation of this section is subject to injunctive relief or mandamus as provided by this code.
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
HUGE: FBI Now Wants 66 Years Before Releasing Information on Seth Rich - Information They Originally DENIED They Had!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/10/huge-fbi-now-wants-66-years-releasing-information-seth-rich-information-originally-denied/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/10/huge-fbi-now-wants-66-years-releasing-information-seth-rich-information-originally-denied/
The Gateway Pundit
HUGE: FBI Now Wants 66 Years Before Releasing Information on Seth Rich - Information They Originally DENIED They Had! | The Gateway…
THIS IS A HUGE DEVELOPMENT– In September US District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas ordered the FBI to “produce the information it possesses related to Seth Rich’s laptop.” In our previous reporting, The Gateway Pundit’s Joe Hoft reported…
👍1
⬆️⬆️ How Very JFK Files of them.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Was feeling sassy a few weeks back, now I want the legislature to bind the SOS to following Election Day procedures throughout Early Voting. Going to ask a favor soon of you all.
🇺🇸🏴☠️
🇺🇸🏴☠️
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Release the files before the statute of limitations for the People being able to demand redress runs out.
🥰5🔥3
Forwarded from Taking Back Texas/ Tarrant County TX SLATE (TBTX) (7 HighSeas)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Message for my subs. Many are under an illusion.
👍2