Yes. This is not a conspiracy theory.
It's just a conspiracy.
It's just a conspiracy.
👍4
Forwarded from Taking Back Texas/ Tarrant County TX SLATE (TBTX) (7 HighSeas)
*achievement unlocked*
I HAVE MADE IT. STARDOM.
🚩 PLS DELETE/ REPORT THESE MESSAGES 🚩
This is not me. I dont deal in crypto. I'm a pirate and I prefer SOLID GOLD DOUBLOONS. 🏴☠️
I HAVE MADE IT. STARDOM.
🚩 PLS DELETE/ REPORT THESE MESSAGES 🚩
This is not me. I dont deal in crypto. I'm a pirate and I prefer SOLID GOLD DOUBLOONS. 🏴☠️
❤5👍3
Telegram has a big issue with fake accounts trying to sell crypto to subs, I get them all the time from fakes of other channels.
I NEVER deal in Crypto, it isn't my thing. Just do the thing where you DELETE, BAN, REPORT et cetera.
I NEVER deal in Crypto, it isn't my thing. Just do the thing where you DELETE, BAN, REPORT et cetera.
👍11
I've got a lot of RINOs following this page to leave snippy comments and manufacture drama over any little thing they can. I'll let them hang out for a while but when they get annoying, I'll delete and ban.
So to all the RINOs, haters, leftists and shills here to watch me work: play it cool. Don't give away your position too quickly. Have a good day, if you can.
😬😁🙏❤🇺🇸🏴☠️
So to all the RINOs, haters, leftists and shills here to watch me work: play it cool. Don't give away your position too quickly. Have a good day, if you can.
😬😁🙏❤🇺🇸🏴☠️
👍4⚡2❤2🥰1
I'm starting to get sort of anxious at the terms "Poll Watcher Training" so I'm changing my course concept to "Election Security" for citizens.
Ok that's better. The SOS can keep their terms
Ok that's better. The SOS can keep their terms
👏15❤3🔥1🤩1
Forwarded from Taking Back Texas/ Tarrant County TX SLATE (TBTX) (7 HighSeas)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hash Code Verification and a glossary of terms.
Since nobody is explaining anything to regular ppl, I thought why not me, right now?
Since nobody is explaining anything to regular ppl, I thought why not me, right now?
👏5
Forwarded from Brian M
Speaking of hash code verification - you might find this interesting…
ES&S have a 'bug' in their hash verification procedures designed to [ostensibly] ensure that “the software and/or firmware of a voting system matches exactly with what was certified by the EAC”.
In the conclusion of Texas technical examiner Brian Mechler’s “Voting System Examination of Election Systems & Software EVS 6.1.1.0” report dated September 20, 2020, he states:
“The ES&S hash verification process has been a growing issue of concern over the past few certification exams. In this exam, their customer relations with regard to this process have also become a concern. At this point, these issues have been communicated in detail to ES&S. I will not recommend certification of future ES&S releases unless they make substantial improvements to the ease-of-use, reliability, and traceability of their hash verification process.”
In spite of his unwillingness to support certification of any future releases from ES&S that fail to address the problems, he somehow finds a way to accept this one while strongly recommending that “jurisdictions perform hash verification for themselves using a two-person verification method as described in Texas’ Election Security Best Practices Guide” as a mitigation for the issue.
Incredible. One can't help but wonder… is this a 'bug', or is it an undocumented feature? Is it still present?
See the report here:
https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/forms/sysexam/brian-mechler-ESS-exam-report-EVS6110-aug.pdf
ES&S have a 'bug' in their hash verification procedures designed to [ostensibly] ensure that “the software and/or firmware of a voting system matches exactly with what was certified by the EAC”.
In the conclusion of Texas technical examiner Brian Mechler’s “Voting System Examination of Election Systems & Software EVS 6.1.1.0” report dated September 20, 2020, he states:
“The ES&S hash verification process has been a growing issue of concern over the past few certification exams. In this exam, their customer relations with regard to this process have also become a concern. At this point, these issues have been communicated in detail to ES&S. I will not recommend certification of future ES&S releases unless they make substantial improvements to the ease-of-use, reliability, and traceability of their hash verification process.”
In spite of his unwillingness to support certification of any future releases from ES&S that fail to address the problems, he somehow finds a way to accept this one while strongly recommending that “jurisdictions perform hash verification for themselves using a two-person verification method as described in Texas’ Election Security Best Practices Guide” as a mitigation for the issue.
Incredible. One can't help but wonder… is this a 'bug', or is it an undocumented feature? Is it still present?
See the report here:
https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/forms/sysexam/brian-mechler-ESS-exam-report-EVS6110-aug.pdf
🤔5
CLARIFICATION of MISINFORMATION Coming Up Next.
VERY Important that we get the details RIGHT and not confuse those who are watching us figure out the truth. Issuing KNOWINGLY false info, regardless of how "Truthy" it can sound, is DAMAGING to our efforts. It gives our already formidable opponents ammo they need to undermine our momentum by easily proving info WRONG and crushing the willpower of volunteers to spend any time with us in the trenches.
Why would they? Why risk reputations and time, energy or money on groups who don't care to tell the truth about events THEY enact?
VERY Important that we get the details RIGHT and not confuse those who are watching us figure out the truth. Issuing KNOWINGLY false info, regardless of how "Truthy" it can sound, is DAMAGING to our efforts. It gives our already formidable opponents ammo they need to undermine our momentum by easily proving info WRONG and crushing the willpower of volunteers to spend any time with us in the trenches.
Why would they? Why risk reputations and time, energy or money on groups who don't care to tell the truth about events THEY enact?
Forwarded from Regular Paitriot 🏴☠️🔥🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥2😱2
Forwarded from Taking Back Texas/ Tarrant County TX SLATE (TBTX) (7 HighSeas)
A.R.T. L&A.pdf
48.1 KB
Here is a new document for anyone wanting to know which questions to ask during LOGIC and ACCURACY Testing/ Public Machine Testing in your counties.
May have an update soon but for now this is the data we look for.
🏴☠️🇺🇸❤🙏
May have an update soon but for now this is the data we look for.
🏴☠️🇺🇸❤🙏
Let me take a moment to THANK GOD for my life and family, and for always providing even when I get impatient and act like a brat.
❤🇺🇸🙏
❤🇺🇸🙏
❤12
If anyone is having issues obtaining Election Records, DM or email me your issue and county.
Forwarded from MillerOps
🚨”Especially since we can’t afford a software glitches going forward”
Forwarded from Taking Back Texas/ Tarrant County TX SLATE (TBTX) (7 HighSeas)
DannyWhitacre (2).pdf
161.4 KB
In Memory of a very kind man, Danny Whitacre for Kenton County Clerk, whom I spent quite a while speaking with over the phone related to his County and State Primary elections, and the corruption within the KYRP.
DannyWhitacre.com
Danwhitacre.com
DannyWhitacre.com
Danwhitacre.com
🥰1
⬆️⬆️⬆️ Will release my dig on the Summe family, who basically owns and manages Kenton County, in memory of Danny. DannyWhitacre.com