I was asked to by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, by Qatar, and by Iran to hold off strikes last night.

We were all set to go. It would have been a massive attack.

When the allies asked to call it off, you gotta sort of say, "Well, let's see."

They think there is a deal. There is a deal on Hormuz, and it will be a deal on the nuclear.

We're holding it. We'll just see. We can strike anytime we want.

But we were asked by the three primary groups. We were also asked by Iran, very strongly actually.

They said, "We'd like to make a deal."

We had an attack that would've been the biggest attack since World War II.

It would have been disastrous for them, and they didn't want us to do it.

Frankly, Saudi Arabia didn't want it either. They thought that a deal is imminent.

I asked the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, "What would you rather have us do?"

He said, "We would prefer a deal rather than an attack."

They wanted a little help and we're always there for Japan.

Japan's been very good to us, with the exception of, of course, Pearl Harbor.

It was going to be a massive attack. It was going to be an attack that would've been by far the biggest attack since World War II.

They asked us not to do it. They said, "Please don't do it." Their neighbors said that too.

We are just going to see whether or not we can make a deal.

Intel, I made $75 billion for the country. I didn't make it for me. I made it for the country.

It's the hottest stock right now on the various stock exchanges. We made about $75-80 billion.

You don't know where these attacks lead. I mean, will the neighbors of Iran be flooded with people pouring into their countries? A disaster.

A lot of bad things can happen.

Once again, in a time of war, the legal system sides with the terrorists, thwarting important steps for Israeli deterrence.

We know that the terrorists are worried about the arrival of the crocodiles, but today the court came to their aid.