Because almost the whole ,alternative media’ was aimed at anti-technology, anti-development, anti-science…

Move to the country, grow your own food and live happily like in the Middle Ages .

RUS and China was created like an antipode… but the main and most important difference is that they are not Malthusians.

Another difference is that they are deciding on a political level about their strategy and plans for the future. They are keeping their billionaires under control. Whereas in the West the oligarchy is controlling the politicians (and would like to control RUS and China as well)

They will have the same technologies (at least at the beginning - before they move on to much more sophisticated and advanced technologies) but they don’t want Davos crowd, globalists, this weirdo old European families, Wallstreet and City of London to be their ,masters’.

💢 Anton Chaitkin describes Globalism and how competitive advantage works in practice.

How did the historical balance between free trade and protectionism that America achieved, striking an optimal mix of trade and tariffs to protect fledgling industries while embracing competition at the right time, actually function?

Over the past four decades, the United States has experienced rapid deindustrialization, leading to a shrinking middle class, rising inequality, and numerous struggling cities across the “Rust Belt” and Middle America. Can America – and Europe – learn valuable lessons from the past to address these issues?

America's founding leaders from the 18th and 19th centuries, such as Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, and Abraham Lincoln understood the critical importance of manufacturing, industries, and infrastructure. How did the construction of the great canals and railways in the 1800s contributed to the USA's rise to power?

Full lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkmtTW0iBkY

Culling For Climate

https://www.aei.org/articles/culling-for-climate/

📢 Kalki Dharma Network

There are people who still think 'The Great Reset' isn't a real agenda.

Despite Klaus Schwab writing a book on it, coverage in 'Time' magazine and a whole website!

This is the Canadian by the handle WhatsHerFace

T.me/ArtWithAim

🇺🇸 SCOTT RITTER:

"I used to have a friend named William Polk. I say 'used to' because, tragically, he passed away a couple of years ago.

William Polk was a man who was in the inner circle for John F. Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

He talked to me many times about the decision-making that was going on and the role that Kennedy played in preventing a nuclear war.

The maturity Kennedy had as a leader—part of that maturity came from when Kennedy was first briefed on what was then called the Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP), the American war plan.

He went to the Pentagon, and they briefed him.

They said, 'This is what we've got if we go to nuclear war.'

Basically, it was premised on the notion that America would be the largest surviving civilization, but to guarantee that, we had to kill everybody in the world.

He came out and said, 'That's insane. I'm not doing that.' He turned to his advisor and said, 'And we call ourselves the human race.' He demanded, 'You have to give me options.'

Every president since then, up until George W. Bush, reacted the same way when they first got that briefing on how America plans to go to war, which is to destroy the entire world so that the 20 to 30% of Americans who survive will be the largest remaining civilization cluster in the world, guaranteeing American global dominance in a post-nuclear conflict.

Insanity. They all said the same thing: 'Insane. Give me options. I can't go to that. You can't make me do this. You have to give me options.'

And the Pentagon always gave them options that inevitably led to that scenario.

Since the end of the Soviet Union, the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Americans have downplayed their nuclear war plan.

We detargeted our missiles; nothing was automatic anymore. We were heading on a path of getting rid of nuclear weapons.

Then George W. Bush came in a post-9/11 environment and said, 'We will use our nuclear weapons to ensure that a 9/11 never happens again.'

We reinserted nuclear war planning into our military doctrine.

Today, we have that same mindset, that same nuclear war strategy, but without the maturity of John F. Kennedy.

We have people who look at the plan and say, 'Well, that's just a plan. We're not really going to do that,' and they say the Russians are bluffing. 'We don't have to worry about this.'

The problem is, the second something happens, and that plan is pulled out, the dust is brushed off, and we start pushing buttons, we go to the scenario that John F. Kennedy said was insanity.

We're going to blow up the entire world because we know that in a post-nuclear environment, we can't allow, for instance, India to survive intact.

If we're reduced to 30% of our capacity, we can't allow India to have a superior civilization in a post-nuclear conflict.

We're going to destroy the entire world.

That's what the American nuclear war plan is.

The American people need to wake up and understand it's on full automatic—full automatic."

https://m.youtube.com/live/lOsW84wYdzg?cbrd=1

ROBINMG 🚀

Penny Bradley
June 5, 2020

I need to say something important here:

No matter how spiritual you are, you need to keep in mind that you live in 3D. That there is a consensus reality that you are tethered to here. As in, you still eat and drink, you still live with or around others, you still have basic social rules to follow or go to jail.

In this consensus reality, there are laws about how humans interact with each other. Theoretically, they are to protect life and property. Some are to protect human rights. Like freedom of religion [that allows you to be all spiritual instead of trapped in a State Church]. And freedom of speech [that allows you to talk about your alternative opinions]. And freedom of assembly. And the right to protest.

This country was founded on protest. Even when we were at war with the rest of the world, we still had protests here. Especially when we were at war, we still had protests here.

As long as minorities are treated as less than, and the police are allowed to kill them with impunity, there will be protests.

I've lived through a protest cycle about every 15 years through my life. These are not the worst. We as a country never needed more than State police for any riots before. Kent State was an example of what happens when armed soldiers are used to stop protests.
Now, some of my friends have had bricks through their windows. I can understand them being frightened. But most of you are sitting and watching it on TV or the internet and are being scared for no reason at all. You are being armchair quarterbacks in a situation that doesn't affect you either way. Think about that.

I have already blocked one person for wanting Posse Comitatus bypassed. I've seen others wanting that on their own walls. Posse Comitatus is there for YOUR protection. To stop the .gov from using the military to destroy parts of OUR nation. You think that protestors cause damage? Have you seen what a military invasion does? You're insane and out of touch with that consensus reality I mentioned in the first paragraph.

I really don't give a rat's ass about Q at this point. IF you think it's okay to suspend the Constitution or Posse Comitatus over anything that has happened so far this year, you are NOT a Patriot. Stop calling yourself that.

Capitibus Et Caudis Dept:

One could argue that both Capitalism and Communism are verily the Heads & Tails of the common coin of Materialism -- underpinned by the deterministic dualistic linear mindset of religious/scientific dogma.

Humanity is well overdue in not only thinking but also jumping outside of the box.

Можно утверждать, что и капитализм, и коммунизм на самом деле являются орелом и решкой общей монеты материализма, подкрепленной детерминистическим дуалистическим линейным мышлением религиозно-научных догм.

Человечеству уже давно пора не только думать, но и выходить за рамки стандартного.

有人可能会说，资本主义和共产主义都是唯物主义的共同硬币的正面和反面——以宗教/科学教条的决定论二元线性思维为基础。

人类早就应该不仅在思考，而且在跳出框框方面。

🙏🏻

NeoHumanism • NeoPolarAxis
.

Morpho Geneticae Materia Dept:

Subjective Approach Thru Objective Adjustment

Microcosm grokking Macrocosm

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P2U-y_gI8Zc

MicroVita Network
.

Victory as Existence

by Alexander Dugin

Winners are not judged. Everyone else is. The only exception is made for winners. For our truth to prevail — in both the grandest sense (civilizational, philosophical, religious) and the smallest (simple facts like shelling, casualties, invasions, attacks on nuclear facilities) — we must, at the very least, win.

War affects the very nature of existence. It is war that decides what exists and what does not. This is the metaphysical aspect of war — it can erase something from existence or bring it into being. As Heraclitus said, war makes one person a master and another a slave. The winner becomes the master and therefore exists. The loser either ceases to exist or becomes a slave, and being a slave is worse than not existing at all.

That is why it is pointless to be outraged by the behavior of modern Germany or Japan — because they lost World War Two, they are now slaves of the West; they effectively do not exist.

After the Cold War, Russia found itself in the position of a slave — thanks to Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and the liberal reformers. And thanks to everyone who supported these traitors and obediently lined up at McDonald’s.

There is a principle in church law: “to treat it as if it had never happened.” This is not a judgment of truth but a judgment of existence. Maybe something existed in some sense, but the church fathers command that it be abolished, reduced to nothing. The fathers, who rule over the present and have triumphed in it, freely and sovereignly, like masters, judge the past, deciding what really happened and what essentially did not.

This is how not only church fathers act, but also any ideology, any power. Orwell did not reveal any “totalitarian” paradox when he said, “who controls the present controls the past.” This is what everyone does, always. If someone wants to challenge a particular verdict on what was or was not, they only need to seize power — that is, to win.

Putin, like a geopolitical Spartacus, has led a rebellion to bring Russia out of non-existence. But Russia will only truly exist when it wins. Existence and victory are synonymous.

Russia is what will come to be.

P.S.: The fate of Ukraine also depends on this war. And it is not just a question of whether it will continue to exist (I hope not), but whether it ever truly existed at all. Existence is not proven by the past; it is determined in the present through the act of creating the future.

(This essay was translated from the Russian.)

Warning from Oliver Stone for Americans and Europeans about the misguided desire of the US to rule the world when multipolarity is rising and the fight for US supremacy is already lost. He suggests it’s better to drop a few ranks than to destroy the world.

Roskosmos working hard in Mali to change the Russia’s balance sheet.

#Mali #Russia #space

🇲🇱 Mali is actively working to expand its space capabilities with the help of Russia 🇷🇺

As part of the cooperation between the two countries, Mali is receiving assistance in developing its space infrastructure and technologies.

📌 This includes support in launching satellites and developing a satellite surveillance system. Russian assistance also includes training and technical support for Malian specialists.

French West Africa was here | Subscribe

#Мали #Россия #космос

🇲🇱 Мали активно работает над расширением своих космических возможностей при помощи России 🇷🇺

В рамках сотрудничества между двумя странами, Мали получает помощь в развитии своей космической инфраструктуры и технологий.

📌 Это включает в себя поддержку в запуске спутников и развитии системы спутникового наблюдения. Российская помощь также включает в себя обучение и техническую поддержку для малийских специалистов.

Тут была французская Западная Африка | Подписаться