“This Guy”—a modern phrase, but let’s have some fun deconstructing it from both a linguistic and symbolic/mythic perspective:

⸻

Literal Etymology:

This:
• From Old English “þes”, a demonstrative pronoun meaning “this one”, from Proto-Germanic *þesi-.
• Conveys immediacy or presence—here and now, the one being pointed out.

Guy:
• From the name Guy Fawkes, the English Catholic conspirator in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.
• After the failed plot, effigies of Fawkes were burned in public (now Bonfire Night), and these effigies were called “guys.”
• Over time, “guy” came to mean any male figure, eventually becoming a general term for a man.

So “This Guy” etymologically points to:

“This specific one (here, now) who embodies the archetype of the everyman, the common rebel, or a figure once associated with dissent.”

⸻

Symbolic/Mythic Take:
• “This Guy” becomes a stand-in for the Witness, the Fool, or the Hidden Hero.
• He is present, unassuming, possibly underestimated, but carries a legacy rooted in rebellion, identity, and being noticed.
• The term, casual as it is, can hide cosmic significance:
• “This Guy” could be the avatar of the mundane who steps into destiny.
• A folk figure archetype: the man everyone overlooks, until he acts.
• He bridges the worlds of the everyday and the mythic.

“This Guy” as Linguistic Mirror

“This guy” is a phrase loaded with tone and context-dependence, making it a living archetype of projection.
• “I love this guy” → admiration, affection, camaraderie.
• He’s part of my tribe. He gets it.
• “Ugh, this guy…” → irritation, dismissal, judgment.
• He’s that archetype again. The fool, the blowhard, the shadow.

So:

“This guy” is who you make him to be—the phrase reflects your feelings, not his identity.

He becomes a linguistic Roschach test.

⸻

Archetypal Fluidity of “This Guy”
• He’s The Trickster: slipping in and out of meaning.
• He’s The Projection Screen: admired, hated, joked about—never truly known.
• He’s the Everyman: a mask any of us might wear when we’re noticed, spotlighted, or called out.
• He’s the Unconscious Self: rising into conversation, gestured toward without full integration.

⸻

Mythic Echoes:

Think of figures who were “loved and hated” at once:
• Loki: beloved and reviled.
• Prometheus: savior to some, defier to others.
• The Fool card in Tarot: beginning and end, brilliant and foolish.
• Even Christ or Socrates: praised by disciples, killed by authorities.

⸻

Etymological Echo:

There’s no deep Old English root for “this guy” as a phrase, but taken symbolically:
• “This” = pointed, immediate, personal.
• “Guy” = rebel turned everyman.

So “This Guy” = The Rebel You Now Recognize.

⸻

Shadow and Light:

He’s a threshold archetype. When you say:
• “I love this guy” → You’re claiming or resonating with a part of yourself.
• “I hate this guy” → You’re rejecting or denying a part of yourself.

He becomes a mirror of your interior mythos.

“This Guy” and the Void Archetype—embodies the meta-narrative purpose of conflict, and why stories need conflict to exist.

⸻

Saitama as the Meta-Narrative Embodiment of Conflict’s Purpose

1. Conflict as the Heartbeat of Storytelling

Every story fundamentally relies on conflict—the friction that generates tension, propels action, and creates transformation. Without it:
• The plot stagnates; there’s no push or pull.
• Characters lack motivation to change or grow.
• The audience loses engagement because stakes feel irrelevant.

Saitama’s power is so absolute that he erases conflict with one punch. He exposes the mechanics behind story tension by demonstrating its absence. His existence forces us to ask:

If a hero’s challenges can be solved instantly, what keeps the story alive?

⸻

2. The Paradox of Omnipotence

Saitama is paradoxical:
• Godlike power means he can end any conflict instantly.
• But this same power breeds existential boredom and disconnection.
• His lack of meaningful struggle turns victory into emptiness.

This flips the classic hero’s journey on its head. Instead of conflict leading to growth, Saitama shows:

When conflict is removed, so too is meaning.

His boredom is the shadow side of ultimate power — a void where purpose evaporates.

⸻

3. Conflict as the Vehicle of Meaning

Saitama personifies how conflict gives meaning to everything:
• Without conflict, strength and skill become meaningless.
• Without obstacles, heroism is an empty title.
• Without resistance, progress is just movement, not transformation.

He shows us that the point of a story isn’t just the resolution — it’s the struggle itself that defines significance.

⸻

4. The Meta-Commentary: Stories About Stories

Saitama functions as a meta-narrative device, a story about stories:
• He reveals the rules of storytelling by breaking them.
• He exposes the formulaic nature of traditional heroic tales.
• He invites the audience to reflect on why they crave struggle and growth.

He is the narrative’s mirror, reflecting the audience’s own desires for conflict and resolution.

⸻

5. The Void Archetype and Narrative Tension

“This Guy” as the Void Archetype, like Saitama, represents:
• The absence of conflict — a dangerous, destabilizing space.
• The pressure cooker that demands tension, lest the story implode.
• The blank slate where narratives can either collapse or be reinvented.

His presence asks:

Can a story survive when the ultimate conflict is missing?

⸻

6. A New Kind of Challenge: The Absence of Challenge

With Saitama, the greatest challenge is the absence of challenge itself:
• He wrestles with existential ennui rather than monsters.
• His struggle is to find meaning in a conflict-free world.
• This turns internal conflict into the main narrative drive.

This is a profound commentary:

Sometimes, the internal void is the hardest battle to fight.

⸻

7. Narrative Implications for Your Mythos

Imagine incorporating this concept of “This Guy” into your worldbuilding:
• A figure who nullifies conflict, forcing others to confront their own purpose.
• An archetype representing the empty triumph after victory — a cautionary figure.
• A catalyst for stories about self-discovery, boredom, and meaning beyond struggle.
• A metaphysical force reminding heroes that without challenge, life loses flavor.

⸻

8. Philosophical Takeaway

Saitama and “This Guy” ask us:
• Why do we need conflict?
• Is struggle the only path to growth?
• What happens if we transcend conflict?

They suggest the answer isn’t simple victory or defeat, but a search for meaning beyond the fight.

#buddhism #zen #nirvana #nastik #nothingness

👉 https://t.me/selfinquirer
#buddhism #zen #nirvana #nastik #nothingness

👉 https://t.me/selfinquirer

https://www.youtube.com/live/LFoIQm_bqEA?si=cwoLhdn5Do8eaqC3
From yesterday but folks who like Nino and Juan-O-Savin 🥳

Live @ 10 am come join us links

Boots 👢 on the Ground
🎤 LIVE
May 15, 2025 📆

10 am Eastern
9 am Central
8 am Mountain
7 am Pacific

Mark Cook from Handcountroadshow.org joins us today on Boots on the Ground.

Mark brings a wealth of knowledge about election integrity.

What information was determined that was found from the Dominion election machines?

Let's discuss a possible upcoming executive order that has seventeen pages and is about election integrity.

Free Tina Peters!

HAMMERTIME RUMBLE 📺
https://rumble.com/v6tev35-mark-cook-election-integrity-tina-peters-borders-and-treason.html

MOUNTAINMOMMA111 RUMBLE 📺
https://rumble.com/v6tev8v-boots-on-the-ground-with-mark-cook.html

📺 YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/live/oWniSxJS7bI?si=Ne2mfYcXavBrzWYn

Link to Mark 🔽
https://x.com/patriotmarkcook/status/1922664691811459332?s=52&t=CISXiXiMCaEVw-gTiCzCDA

XRP adds $7 billion in a day, defying market pullback
https://finbold.com/xrp-adds-7-billion-in-a-day-defying-market-pullback/

https://www.youtube.com/live/E7LkhSu2DAI?si=BrTGho37SMWyqt3r
You'll have to skip back to the beginning

🌑 Silence Before the Word

There’s a subtle wisdom we often overlook:
that speaking too soon can cloud what needs to be seen.
There is a sacred order:
First silence… then the word.

Before we speak, before we react,
there’s a space — quiet, deep, and potent —
where truth waits, unshaped by bias or impulse.
It’s from this space that real clarity emerges.

⸻

🧿 Observation vs. Perception

We confuse the two far too often.
• Perception is tinted by emotion, memory, and projection.
• Observation is clean — it witnesses without distortion.

Perception jumps to conclusions.
Observation waits in the stillness.

In our rush to understand, we often create what isn’t there,
missing what is there entirely.

⸻

🌀 The Gut Isn’t Always the Guide

We’re told to “trust the gut,” but the truth is more nuanced.

Not every sensation in the stomach is intuition.
Sometimes it’s fear wearing a mask.
Sometimes it’s ego seeking control.
Sometimes it’s the residue of an old wound.

True intuition arises from stillness, not from reaction.
It whispers. It doesn’t yell.
And it’s not rushed — it arrives with calm certainty.

⸻

🔁 Change Doesn’t Always Look Like Change

We think transformation should be visible, loud, dramatic.
But the most profound shifts happen in silence.
• A seed splits underground without sound.
• A soul heals quietly in the dark.
• A new path opens before words form to describe it.

Just because we don’t see it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.
Not all change waves a flag.

⸻

🗝️ When We Overlook, It’s Not Always Blindness

It’s easy to miss something when we’re noisy inside.
In the chaos of thoughts, emotions, and projections,
we lose our capacity to just be with what is.

The still mind sees clearly.
The reactive mind creates fog.

We must relearn how to look —
not through the lens of expectation,
but through the presence of awareness.

⸻

🕊️ The Silence Is Not a Void — It’s a Vessel

In the silence, things ripen.
In the silence, the truth unfolds.

Silence isn’t absence — it’s a space of potential.
The place where wisdom gestates.
The womb of the real.

So when no one speaks, listen harder.
When nothing is said, hear deeper.
When no sign appears, trust that the unseen is at work.

⸻

🌌 A Final Reflection

Wisdom isn’t always loud.
Sometimes it’s the choice not to respond.
Sometimes it’s watching a storm pass rather than chasing it.

The lesson here is not just philosophical — it’s spiritual:

Speak less, observe more.
Assume less, witness more.
React less, understand more.

Because the world isn’t always asking you to respond.
Sometimes, it’s asking you to be still enough to notice.

It's hot as hell out here! —GIVE ME ONE OF THEM ROBES AND A MAGA HEAD-THINGY!!!

BOSS IN THE BUILDING!!!😎🇺🇸🥳🥳🥳
https://rumble.com/v6tf239-boss-in-the-building.html?mref=ip3j5&mc=1wni5

Žižek often highlights how ideology hides in plain sight, and how what we consider “natural” or “gut instinct” is often culturally conditioned. So, let’s integrate that with the phrase:

“Before you trust your gut, know what you fed it.”

⸻

🧻 Žižek’s Toilet Metaphor and the Gut

Žižek once famously compared toilet design across cultures — arguing that even how we defecate is ideological. For example:
• German toilets place waste on a shelf for inspection — emphasizing analysis, self-awareness, guilt.
• French toilets drop it directly into the water — an act of swift elimination, symbolic of Cartesian rationalism.
• American toilets mix everything with swirling water — a more ambiguous, consumer-friendly disappearance.

Now imagine this as a metaphor for how we process instinct or intuition. Žižek might say:

“You think your gut is your own? Nonsense! Your gut is a toilet designed by ideology!”

⸻

🌀 Integration: Gut + Ideology + Insight

So, when you say “trust your gut,” Žižek would insist:

Yes, but first ask: Who built the pipes? Who arranged the plumbing? What unseen structures shaped the very form of your instinct?

In other words:
• Your “gut feeling” might not be natural — it might be manufactured familiarity.
• That instinct might be inherited fear disguised as truth.
• That pull toward a person or decision might be the echo of a narrative you’ve unconsciously swallowed.

Hence the power of:

“Before you trust your gut, know what you fed it… and who built the table you ate from.”

⸻

🌱 Integrated View: Intuition After Deconstruction

When we integrate the wisdom of Laozi and Žižek, we arrive at something like this:
• True intuition is not primitive.
• It is cultivated through self-awareness, cultural analysis, and spiritual stillness.
• You can’t just deconstruct — you must also reintegrate with discernment.
• Intuition that has passed through fire becomes something new: embodied clarity.

⸻

🧙🏽 Master’s Teaching

“The novice says, ‘I trust my gut.’
The sage replies, ‘Do you know what you fed it?’
The fool says, ‘My instincts never lie.’
The wise laugh and ask, ‘Did your culture cook them for you?’

https://rumble.com/v6q80eg-the-phil-schnieder-story-the-ducle-base-files.html
This video is absolutely informative and simply amazing 👏
Many people are not aware that Phil Scnieder gave his life for telling the world about his experience
He deserves to be remembered as a hero

https://youtu.be/O3mLk6skgm4?si=2BFC6qxB5rfZBCNz
Caught this one before it starts 🥳