This is a compilation of all Dr. Harold Hillmans' videos that can be found online.
From the description: "Hillman has, since all the way back in the 1980s, proven that many still currently accepted so-called cellular components, especially ones ‘established’ through electron microscopy, are in effect little more than artefacts arising from experimental handling. The layman who has heard of electron microscopes would probably be thinking that they are, basically, merely a more powerful kind of microscope. It is therefore safe to assume that the difference is popularly (perhaps even among ‘non-specialized’ scientists) imagined as being a mainly quantitative one. Not so. Those who take a close look at Hillman’s work will discover that the differenCES are in fact principally qualitative and of diverse kinds, with many consequences impacting on observations using either light or electron instruments (the ones with ‘most fidelity’ are not those perhaps commonly imagined to be so). When talking about cell biology, one most often hears, naturally, about how mindbogglingly complex a cell is. It turns out that the entire group of artefacts leading to the misidentification of supposed cell components has a complexity of its own; so much so that it has now taken a life of its own. Quite literally. However, rest assured that many arguments presented by Hillman are absolutely straightforward, often consisting of nothing more than glaring geometrical inconsistencies. You have read that right. Geometry does not cease to be relevant at molecular and atomic scales, otherwise it would not be possible to hear of things like stereochemistry or crystallography. It goes without saying that Hillman’s findings corollarily undermine corresponding mechanisms (in fact models) that are currently taken for granted as a description of the functioning of the cell. For example, your understanding of this article will in no way involve any action by any synapses, since “synapses” are a misinterpretation."
News Feed: @StarfireCodes
Chat: @StarfireCodesChat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4U6wiVcw-o
From the description: "Hillman has, since all the way back in the 1980s, proven that many still currently accepted so-called cellular components, especially ones ‘established’ through electron microscopy, are in effect little more than artefacts arising from experimental handling. The layman who has heard of electron microscopes would probably be thinking that they are, basically, merely a more powerful kind of microscope. It is therefore safe to assume that the difference is popularly (perhaps even among ‘non-specialized’ scientists) imagined as being a mainly quantitative one. Not so. Those who take a close look at Hillman’s work will discover that the differenCES are in fact principally qualitative and of diverse kinds, with many consequences impacting on observations using either light or electron instruments (the ones with ‘most fidelity’ are not those perhaps commonly imagined to be so). When talking about cell biology, one most often hears, naturally, about how mindbogglingly complex a cell is. It turns out that the entire group of artefacts leading to the misidentification of supposed cell components has a complexity of its own; so much so that it has now taken a life of its own. Quite literally. However, rest assured that many arguments presented by Hillman are absolutely straightforward, often consisting of nothing more than glaring geometrical inconsistencies. You have read that right. Geometry does not cease to be relevant at molecular and atomic scales, otherwise it would not be possible to hear of things like stereochemistry or crystallography. It goes without saying that Hillman’s findings corollarily undermine corresponding mechanisms (in fact models) that are currently taken for granted as a description of the functioning of the cell. For example, your understanding of this article will in no way involve any action by any synapses, since “synapses” are a misinterpretation."
News Feed: @StarfireCodes
Chat: @StarfireCodesChat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4U6wiVcw-o
YouTube
Dr Harold Hillman Exposed The Scientific Fraud of Western Medicine 1977: Cell Biology: Research
*** If the music is distracting you, I have uploaded all clips without music here: https://youtu.be/SVvWyiDETDU ***
If the basis of cell biology science is fraudulent or corrupted, then how can any scientific research, derived from this foundation be true?…
If the basis of cell biology science is fraudulent or corrupted, then how can any scientific research, derived from this foundation be true?…
The Starfire Codes pinned «This is a compilation of all Dr. Harold Hillmans' videos that can be found online. From the description: "Hillman has, since all the way back in the 1980s, proven that many still currently accepted so-called cellular components, especially ones ‘established’…»
Check this out, and we will be recording part two next week! 🙏💜
Podcast: Michael Bell Interviews Demi Pietchell on The Pureblood Podcast
Episode: Our Dark Premonition, Part One
https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/podcast-michael-bell-interviews-demi
News Feed: @StarfireCodes
Chat: @StarfireCodesChat
Podcast: Michael Bell Interviews Demi Pietchell on The Pureblood Podcast
Episode: Our Dark Premonition, Part One
https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/podcast-michael-bell-interviews-demi
News Feed: @StarfireCodes
Chat: @StarfireCodesChat
The Starfire Codes by Demi Pietchell
Podcast: Michael Bell Interviews Demi Pietchell on The Pureblood Podcast
Episode: Our Dark Premonition, Part One
The Starfire Codes pinned «Check this out, and we will be recording part two next week! 🙏💜 Podcast: Michael Bell Interviews Demi Pietchell on The Pureblood Podcast Episode: Our Dark Premonition, Part One https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/podcast-michael-bell-interviews-demi News…»
On the Back of a Tiger: Episode One, Gilbert Ling
“The inaugural episode from the "On the Back of a Tiger" series, profiling the life and work of unsung heroes of science and their battles with the establishment. This episode is about Dr. Gilbert N. Ling.
“Decades ago, Gilbert singlehandedly devised an alternate theory of the living cell, answering the glaring questions of the standard model. We can also thank him for intracellular electrodes and inspiring the inventor of the MRI.
“Gilbert passed away in November [2019] just short of his 100th birthday. His uncompromising questioning of the status quo has kept us motivated over the years. We hope you’re inspired by his story too.”
News Feed: @StarfireCodes
Chat: @StarfireCodesChat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVIbcg3La_E
“The inaugural episode from the "On the Back of a Tiger" series, profiling the life and work of unsung heroes of science and their battles with the establishment. This episode is about Dr. Gilbert N. Ling.
“Decades ago, Gilbert singlehandedly devised an alternate theory of the living cell, answering the glaring questions of the standard model. We can also thank him for intracellular electrodes and inspiring the inventor of the MRI.
“Gilbert passed away in November [2019] just short of his 100th birthday. His uncompromising questioning of the status quo has kept us motivated over the years. We hope you’re inspired by his story too.”
News Feed: @StarfireCodes
Chat: @StarfireCodesChat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVIbcg3La_E
YouTube
On the Back of a Tiger: Episode One, Gilbert Ling
The inaugural episode from the "On the Back of a Tiger" series, profiling the life and work of unsung heroes of science and their battles with the establishment. This episode is about Dr. Gilbert N. Ling.
Decades ago, Gilbert singlehandedly devised an alternate…
Decades ago, Gilbert singlehandedly devised an alternate…
The Starfire Codes pinned «On the Back of a Tiger: Episode One, Gilbert Ling “The inaugural episode from the "On the Back of a Tiger" series, profiling the life and work of unsung heroes of science and their battles with the establishment. This episode is about Dr. Gilbert N. Ling.…»
Two Beacons of Hope Combine In The Darkness To Show The Way
Channeled Messages 2-17-2022
https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/two-beacons-of-hope-combine-in-the
News Feed: @StarfireCodes
Chat: @StarfireCodesChat
Channeled Messages 2-17-2022
https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/two-beacons-of-hope-combine-in-the
News Feed: @StarfireCodes
Chat: @StarfireCodesChat
Substack
Two Beacons of Hope Combine In The Darkness To Show The Way
Channeled Messages 2-17-2022
The Starfire Codes pinned «Two Beacons of Hope Combine In The Darkness To Show The Way Channeled Messages 2-17-2022 https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/two-beacons-of-hope-combine-in-the News Feed: @StarfireCodes Chat: @StarfireCodesChat»