60% of British factories/industry shutting down.

That would be the majority of their productive output. It’s pretty staggering when you think about it. This is a crash, not a soft landing.

Also what do you think this means for agriculture?!

#uk #EnergyCrisis

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-02/six-in-10-british-factories-at-risk-of-going-under-as-bills-soar

Hmm. If you've ever wondered why the psychopaths want to stomp most people like ants, the answer to that question is probably exemplified by this behavior right here....

I'm not condoning either "side" of this - I'm neither murderous nor a moron.

I'm simply saying that when people act like either "side" of this equation, it makes me want to relocate to some other plane of existence... preferably one where I will not be harmed by a situation where psychotic people are creating false fear paradigms in order to choke others out of health, food, energy, sovereignty... and you know... dignity - AND THE REST ARE MAKING EXCUSES FOR THEM AND ALLOWING IT TO OCCUR. 🙄🤦🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

Where is your logic? Where is your sense of self-preservation?

I'll gladly say what no one else is saying: I don't want to live alongside the murderous OR the suicidally stupid.

Is that REALLY too much to ask?!

Follow @StarfireCodes 🙏🏻💜💫
Substack | Truth | Gettr | IG

Is it moral for one man to rule over another man, to require one man, against his own conscience or desire, by force or violence, to carry out another man’s will? I would argue that it is not. For social participation to be moral or ethical, the mutual consent of both parties must be established.

The only reason why so many are willingly participating in their own immoral enslavement is because they have been programmed by layers of lies to believe that it is good and essential to their existence. Or perhaps they believe that there are no other alternatives because their spirits have been beaten down so badly for generations that they have forgotten they are free men and women by design and by birthright.

We do not need to consent to the tyrannical, whimsical desires of other men or women, whether they call themselves “government” or not. No man has a moral right or duty to rule another by threat of violence. This is evil. We are all free unless we CHOOSE otherwise.

Are You Living Your Dream?

Channeled Messages 9-3-2022

https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/are-you-living-your-dream

Excerpt: "Your meditative practice causes a breakthrough. You end a state of fragility by removing residual rejection and abandonment energies from your emotional body. Those who are most loyal, the closest ones to you, have been instrumental in keeping your heart centered and balanced, even when you felt off kilter or wondered if you were going to break...."

Follow @StarfireCodes 🙏🏻💜💫
Substack | Truth | Gettr | IG

Inoculations every 90 days? Will you listen to us now? 😳🤷🏾‍♂️

I want to address an argument that many in the so-called truth movement make in regards to "viruses" which is that the germ theory and terrain theory are not mutually exclusive. These are even false terms in my view, the correct terms are the germ hypothesis & terrain model.

I truly understand this false perspective that people may have and it's easy to demonstrate this level of thinking by just throwing seeds on the concrete where nothing will happen with the seeds due to terrain being wrong but if we put the seeds in the soil they will start to grow because the terrain is in alignment with the seeds. Now I will only address this false argument in relation to "viruses" and not bacteria, fungi & parasites because bacteria, fungi & parasites actually exist while there is no evidence for the existence of "viruses".

To all of you that hold this position, I would like you to answer this question: how can something that never been proven to exist in nature by the use of the scientific method ever be a cause of something regardless of the status of the terrain? To even entertain that argument we would first have to prove the existence of the "virus", then and only then could we begin to argue from the experimental evidence if the germ hypothesis & terrain model are complementary in regards to "viruses".

I would also like to say that in my view the terrain model got nothing to do with "viruses" because we would first have to prove the existence of "viruses" before we can begin to argue about how they may behave in various environments. This is why I constantly state in my interviews that there is nothing to debate here in regards to "viruses" because all "virologists", institutions, scientists and researchers around the world are all in full agreement with the fact that they have never found an alleged "virus" directly from nature. This is also one of the reasons I have turned down debates because what is there to debate, either something exists or it doesn't. It's like arguing about the existence of unicorns, either we have found unicorns in nature or we haven't.

There is no ambiguity here, there is no middle ground, period.

Another rinse and repeat virus yarn fools the public with identical 'symptoms to look out for'. The same symptoms of course that can have a multitude of causes in the bioterrain model.

A U.K. government program is *raising red flags*
tinyurl.com/3b3hx8en

Larken Rose, Most Dangerous Superstition:

What is this thing we call "government"? It is an organization that tells people what to do. But that alone does not provide a complete definition, because all sorts of
other individuals and organizations that we do not call "government" also tell people what to do. "Government," however, does not simply suggest or request; it commands. Then again, advertisers and preachers could also be said to give commands, but they are not considered "government." Unlike the "commands" of preachers and advertisers, the commands of "government" are backed by the threat of punishment, the use of force against those who do not comply. But even that does not give us a complete definition, because street thugs and bullies also enforce their commands, but no one refers to them as "government."

The distinguishing feature of "government" is that it is thought to have the moral right to give and enforce commands. Its commands are called "laws," and disobeying its commands is called "crime." In short, the defining factor which makes something "government" is the perceived legitimacy and righteousness of the power and control it exerts over others--in other words, its "authority."

"Authority" can be summed up as the right to rule. It is not merely the ability to forcibly control others, which to some extent nearly everyone possesses. It is the supposed moral right to forcibly control others. What distinguishes a street gang from "government" is how they are perceived by the people they control. The trespasses, robbery, extortion, assault and murder committed by common thugs are perceived by almost everyone as being immoral, unjustified, and criminal. Their victims may comply with their demands, but not out of any feeling of moral obligation to obey, merely out of fear. If the intended victims of the street gang thought they could resist without any danger to themselves, they would do so, without the slightest feeling of guilt. They do not perceive the street thug to be any sort of legitimate, rightful ruler; they do not imagine him to be "authority." The loot the thug collects is not referred to as "taxes," and his threats are not called "laws."

Teach your kids to question authority. Most who fancy themselves as “authorities” are full of shit.

"Viruses" - Baileys, Cowan & Kaufman Respond To Del Bigtree

In a recent interview, Del Bigtree suggested that the world is not ready for the "no virus" conversation.
We take a different view, watch our take 👇

https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/interviews/viruses-baileys-cowan-kaufman-respond-to-del-bigtree/