The USDA has stopped providing export data.

They declined to indicate why.

They neglected to provide a timeline for when this may be available again.

Regardless of the presumably forthcoming excuse, this is effectively an act of warfare as markets (domestic AND foreign) are now blind to what is going/coming from the US.

UPDATE: they now indicate there is an issue migrating to a new reporting system that should be resolved by mid september. Interesting date given futures contracts…

#FoodWars

Cargo vessel carrying 3k TONS of corn from Ukraine runs aground in Bosphorus - Black Sea access blocked

@iceagefarmer note: Remember: #Shipping is to be completely shut down under the Absolute Zero carbon agenda. Messing up the global food supply chain is just the cherry on top.

#AbsoluteZero

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1663521/Bosphorus-strait-Black-Sea-access-blocked-lady-zehma-cargo-grain-run-aground

Yuval Harari echoes the WEF claims that meat is “unsustainable” and we must end farming and ranching:

Yuval Noah Harari, historian, futurist, and World Economic Forum (WEF) adviser, described “cultured meat” synthesized in laboratories as more “ecological” and “ethical” than meat from animal husbandry and slaughter.

#WarOnMeat #PostAnimalEconomy

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/30/yuval-noah-harari-cultured-meat-synthesized-labs-more-ethical-animal-husbandry/

USA: even the food supply is partisan, as “democrat-owned” restaurants stop ordering food from “republican” bakeries. Without further comment:

https://billypenn.com/2022/05/12/martins-potato-rolls-doug-mastriano-governor-philadelphia-restaurants/

60% of British factories/industry shutting down.

That would be the majority of their productive output. It’s pretty staggering when you think about it. This is a crash, not a soft landing.

Also what do you think this means for agriculture?!

#uk #EnergyCrisis

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-02/six-in-10-british-factories-at-risk-of-going-under-as-bills-soar

Hmm. If you've ever wondered why the psychopaths want to stomp most people like ants, the answer to that question is probably exemplified by this behavior right here....

I'm not condoning either "side" of this - I'm neither murderous nor a moron.

I'm simply saying that when people act like either "side" of this equation, it makes me want to relocate to some other plane of existence... preferably one where I will not be harmed by a situation where psychotic people are creating false fear paradigms in order to choke others out of health, food, energy, sovereignty... and you know... dignity - AND THE REST ARE MAKING EXCUSES FOR THEM AND ALLOWING IT TO OCCUR. 🙄🤦🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

Where is your logic? Where is your sense of self-preservation?

I'll gladly say what no one else is saying: I don't want to live alongside the murderous OR the suicidally stupid.

Is that REALLY too much to ask?!

Follow @StarfireCodes 🙏🏻💜💫
Substack | Truth | Gettr | IG

Is it moral for one man to rule over another man, to require one man, against his own conscience or desire, by force or violence, to carry out another man’s will? I would argue that it is not. For social participation to be moral or ethical, the mutual consent of both parties must be established.

The only reason why so many are willingly participating in their own immoral enslavement is because they have been programmed by layers of lies to believe that it is good and essential to their existence. Or perhaps they believe that there are no other alternatives because their spirits have been beaten down so badly for generations that they have forgotten they are free men and women by design and by birthright.

We do not need to consent to the tyrannical, whimsical desires of other men or women, whether they call themselves “government” or not. No man has a moral right or duty to rule another by threat of violence. This is evil. We are all free unless we CHOOSE otherwise.

Are You Living Your Dream?

Channeled Messages 9-3-2022

https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/are-you-living-your-dream

Excerpt: "Your meditative practice causes a breakthrough. You end a state of fragility by removing residual rejection and abandonment energies from your emotional body. Those who are most loyal, the closest ones to you, have been instrumental in keeping your heart centered and balanced, even when you felt off kilter or wondered if you were going to break...."

Follow @StarfireCodes 🙏🏻💜💫
Substack | Truth | Gettr | IG

Inoculations every 90 days? Will you listen to us now? 😳🤷🏾‍♂️

I want to address an argument that many in the so-called truth movement make in regards to "viruses" which is that the germ theory and terrain theory are not mutually exclusive. These are even false terms in my view, the correct terms are the germ hypothesis & terrain model.

I truly understand this false perspective that people may have and it's easy to demonstrate this level of thinking by just throwing seeds on the concrete where nothing will happen with the seeds due to terrain being wrong but if we put the seeds in the soil they will start to grow because the terrain is in alignment with the seeds. Now I will only address this false argument in relation to "viruses" and not bacteria, fungi & parasites because bacteria, fungi & parasites actually exist while there is no evidence for the existence of "viruses".

To all of you that hold this position, I would like you to answer this question: how can something that never been proven to exist in nature by the use of the scientific method ever be a cause of something regardless of the status of the terrain? To even entertain that argument we would first have to prove the existence of the "virus", then and only then could we begin to argue from the experimental evidence if the germ hypothesis & terrain model are complementary in regards to "viruses".

I would also like to say that in my view the terrain model got nothing to do with "viruses" because we would first have to prove the existence of "viruses" before we can begin to argue about how they may behave in various environments. This is why I constantly state in my interviews that there is nothing to debate here in regards to "viruses" because all "virologists", institutions, scientists and researchers around the world are all in full agreement with the fact that they have never found an alleged "virus" directly from nature. This is also one of the reasons I have turned down debates because what is there to debate, either something exists or it doesn't. It's like arguing about the existence of unicorns, either we have found unicorns in nature or we haven't.

There is no ambiguity here, there is no middle ground, period.

Another rinse and repeat virus yarn fools the public with identical 'symptoms to look out for'. The same symptoms of course that can have a multitude of causes in the bioterrain model.