‼️S4T Friday Night Zoom @ 8PM (EST)‼️
First, we’re starting with a BIG win.
Laurie has officially filed a petition for Judicial Review challenging the City of Nanaimo’s use of the Alternative Approval Process (AAP) to expand its electoral boundary onto federal reserve land.
CONGRATS LAURIE. 🥳🥳
Now… here’s where things take a turn.
After last Friday’s Zoom, we dug deeper into the AAP while preparing the court materials and what we uncovered is far more serious than it first appeared.
This isn’t just a questionable process. This AAP:
• Pushes beyond what the legislation allows for AAP use (which is meant for limited, administrative matters)
• Attempts something that has never been done before in Canada - incorporating federal reserve land into a municipal electoral boundary
• Raises a major precedent question: if this goes through… what stops other municipalities from doing the same?
At the center of it all is a critical issue: This change would allow individuals who do not pay municipal property taxes to vote on tax-funded municipal decisions. And with historically low voter turnout, it wouldn’t take many additional votes to significantly influence election outcomes.
So the question becomes, is this just Nanaimo… or the start of something much bigger? And yes… the driving force behind all of this ties back to one word: Reconciliation.
Tonight, we’ll break down:
• What we uncovered this week
• The legal vulnerabilities in the AAP
• What this could mean short and long term • Where this goes next
Join us tonight at 8PM.
Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble: https://rumble.com/v78c5vy-s4t-friday-zoom-by-the-grace-of-god.html
#fridayzoom
#stand4thee
#fafo
#takingaction
First, we’re starting with a BIG win.
Laurie has officially filed a petition for Judicial Review challenging the City of Nanaimo’s use of the Alternative Approval Process (AAP) to expand its electoral boundary onto federal reserve land.
CONGRATS LAURIE. 🥳🥳
Now… here’s where things take a turn.
After last Friday’s Zoom, we dug deeper into the AAP while preparing the court materials and what we uncovered is far more serious than it first appeared.
This isn’t just a questionable process. This AAP:
• Pushes beyond what the legislation allows for AAP use (which is meant for limited, administrative matters)
• Attempts something that has never been done before in Canada - incorporating federal reserve land into a municipal electoral boundary
• Raises a major precedent question: if this goes through… what stops other municipalities from doing the same?
At the center of it all is a critical issue: This change would allow individuals who do not pay municipal property taxes to vote on tax-funded municipal decisions. And with historically low voter turnout, it wouldn’t take many additional votes to significantly influence election outcomes.
So the question becomes, is this just Nanaimo… or the start of something much bigger? And yes… the driving force behind all of this ties back to one word: Reconciliation.
Tonight, we’ll break down:
• What we uncovered this week
• The legal vulnerabilities in the AAP
• What this could mean short and long term • Where this goes next
Join us tonight at 8PM.
Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble: https://rumble.com/v78c5vy-s4t-friday-zoom-by-the-grace-of-god.html
#fridayzoom
#stand4thee
#fafo
#takingaction
Zoom
Join our Cloud HD Video Meeting
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise cloud communications.
🔥2
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
TOMORROW IS THE FINAL DAY TO HAVE YOUR SAY, NANAIMO!👇👇👇👇
‼️NANAIMO RESIDENTS TAKE ACTION‼️
An Alternative Approval Process (AAP) is underway in Nanaimo to extend the municipal boundary to include Snuneymuxw First Nation lands.
This would be the first municipality in Canada to incorporate federal reserve land and non–property tax–paying residents into a municipal electoral system.
Reserve are federally regulated; individuals residing on reserve are *exempt* from municipal property taxation under the Indian Act. Despite this, the extension would allow residents to participate in municipal elections that affect services paid by property taxes
Voter turnout in Nanaimo elections has been low, with appr. 23% participation in the 2022 election. The addition of approx 800 eligible voters could have a measurable impact on electoral outcomes.
👇👇👇Submit an opposition before 4:30 on April 13 : https://www.nanaimo.ca/your-government/alternative-approval-process/municipal-boundary-extension-aap
‼️NANAIMO RESIDENTS TAKE ACTION‼️
An Alternative Approval Process (AAP) is underway in Nanaimo to extend the municipal boundary to include Snuneymuxw First Nation lands.
This would be the first municipality in Canada to incorporate federal reserve land and non–property tax–paying residents into a municipal electoral system.
Reserve are federally regulated; individuals residing on reserve are *exempt* from municipal property taxation under the Indian Act. Despite this, the extension would allow residents to participate in municipal elections that affect services paid by property taxes
Voter turnout in Nanaimo elections has been low, with appr. 23% participation in the 2022 election. The addition of approx 800 eligible voters could have a measurable impact on electoral outcomes.
👇👇👇Submit an opposition before 4:30 on April 13 : https://www.nanaimo.ca/your-government/alternative-approval-process/municipal-boundary-extension-aap
👍1
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
FRIENDS... UPDATE ON THE NANAIMO AAP:
Laurie on the docket for 2pm in Nanaimo today.
GOOOOO @lauriesmith123, YOU GOT THIS!
Laurie on the docket for 2pm in Nanaimo today.
GOOOOO @lauriesmith123, YOU GOT THIS!
👍6🔥1
Who they gonna blame now that they weasled into a majority?
#traitors
#arrestthemall
#criminalliberals
#traitors
#arrestthemall
#criminalliberals
👍4
Forwarded from David Avocado Wolfe
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇨🇦 Police in Alberta, supposedly the bastion of freedom in Canzuela, implement facial recognition technology after Edmonton Police Chief’s recent visit to Israel. (1 min, 36 sec)
Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑
Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑
👎4
If we don't do something now, it will be too late!
In what world does one NOT fully investigate the crime of genocide to either prove it existed or that it doidn't.
In what world does one NOT fully investigate the crime of genocide to either prove it existed or that it doidn't.
👏1
Forwarded from Wiretap News Feed
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💥UNREAL: Indigenous Senator Michele Audette demands “residential school denialism” be added to Bill C-9 as hate speech. Sponsor Kris Wells agrees — and confirms separate laws are already in the works to protect the mass grave hoax.
🤮4
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
‼️Stand4THEE Friday Zoom @ 8PM (EST)‼️
Nanaimo didn’t put this to a vote, they let it pass by default.
The city used an Alternative Approval Process to expand its boundary and bring Snuneymuxw reserve lands into the municipal electoral area, which means it automatically goes through unless at least 10% of voters formally object. In this case, fewer than 1% did, so it passed.
This affects who can participate in municipal elections. It also wasn’t happening in isolation. Chief Mike Wyse had approached Mayor Krog to advance reconciliation priorities, making this part of a broader policy push.
A referendum requires voters to actively approve something. An AAP is the opposite, it passes unless enough people object. With a municipal election in October, this could have gone to a referendum.
Instead, it passed without a vote, not of support, but because no one pushed back.
Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble: https://rumble.com/v78neuo-s4t-friday-zoom-april-17th-no-vote.-it-still-passed..html
Nanaimo didn’t put this to a vote, they let it pass by default.
The city used an Alternative Approval Process to expand its boundary and bring Snuneymuxw reserve lands into the municipal electoral area, which means it automatically goes through unless at least 10% of voters formally object. In this case, fewer than 1% did, so it passed.
This affects who can participate in municipal elections. It also wasn’t happening in isolation. Chief Mike Wyse had approached Mayor Krog to advance reconciliation priorities, making this part of a broader policy push.
A referendum requires voters to actively approve something. An AAP is the opposite, it passes unless enough people object. With a municipal election in October, this could have gone to a referendum.
Instead, it passed without a vote, not of support, but because no one pushed back.
Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble: https://rumble.com/v78neuo-s4t-friday-zoom-april-17th-no-vote.-it-still-passed..html
❤4👍1
Forwarded from The Great Restoration
Nova Scotia court agrees with CCF: last summer’s woods ban was unlawful
Post author:The CCF
Post published:April 17, 2026
HALIFAX – On Friday, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia issued a decision finding that the 2025 ban on entering the woods to prevent forest fires was unreasonable and therefore unlawful.
Justice Jamie S. Campbell agreed with the Canadian Constitution Foundation (the “CCF”) that the ban limited mobility rights protected by section 6 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and that the Minister of the Department of Natural Resources failed to give any consideration to those rights, including how to minimize their impact.
Justice Campbell found that although the minister’s decision could be overturned on the basis of a failure to consider mobility rights alone, he suggested the ban may also have been unconstitutionally vague because it was unclear what qualified as “woods” and therefore which places people could not enter without risking a fine of $28,872.50 and up to six months in jail. Justice Campbell also suggested the ban may have been overbroad because it applied to areas like rock-barren land where there is no risk of fire.
Justice Campbell made clear that the case was never about whether Nova Scotia faced a serious risk of forest fires or whether the government may act to try to prevent them.
“Individual rights insert themselves into the public debate in contexts that can be inconvenient,” Justice Campbell wrote.
“But if the rights of individuals are not safeguarded in those circumstances, they can be eroded in a way that eventually affects everyone,” he added.
Josh Dehaas, Interim Litigation Director for the CCF, said that the decision is a reminder that governments must always consider people’s constitutional rights and freedoms.
“We’re thankful that the court recognized this was an unreasonable decision and we hope it puts governments on notice that they should not take such extreme and confusing measures again,” he said.
“We are also thankful for everyone who signed our petition, donated to the case – and most especially to our excellent Halifax-based counsel,” he added.
The CCF was represented by counsel Nijhawan McMillan & Conlon Barristers. https://theccf.ca/nova-scotia-court-agrees-with-ccf-last-summers-woods-ban-was-unlawful/
Post author:The CCF
Post published:April 17, 2026
HALIFAX – On Friday, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia issued a decision finding that the 2025 ban on entering the woods to prevent forest fires was unreasonable and therefore unlawful.
Justice Jamie S. Campbell agreed with the Canadian Constitution Foundation (the “CCF”) that the ban limited mobility rights protected by section 6 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and that the Minister of the Department of Natural Resources failed to give any consideration to those rights, including how to minimize their impact.
Justice Campbell found that although the minister’s decision could be overturned on the basis of a failure to consider mobility rights alone, he suggested the ban may also have been unconstitutionally vague because it was unclear what qualified as “woods” and therefore which places people could not enter without risking a fine of $28,872.50 and up to six months in jail. Justice Campbell also suggested the ban may have been overbroad because it applied to areas like rock-barren land where there is no risk of fire.
Justice Campbell made clear that the case was never about whether Nova Scotia faced a serious risk of forest fires or whether the government may act to try to prevent them.
“Individual rights insert themselves into the public debate in contexts that can be inconvenient,” Justice Campbell wrote.
“But if the rights of individuals are not safeguarded in those circumstances, they can be eroded in a way that eventually affects everyone,” he added.
Josh Dehaas, Interim Litigation Director for the CCF, said that the decision is a reminder that governments must always consider people’s constitutional rights and freedoms.
“We’re thankful that the court recognized this was an unreasonable decision and we hope it puts governments on notice that they should not take such extreme and confusing measures again,” he said.
“We are also thankful for everyone who signed our petition, donated to the case – and most especially to our excellent Halifax-based counsel,” he added.
The CCF was represented by counsel Nijhawan McMillan & Conlon Barristers. https://theccf.ca/nova-scotia-court-agrees-with-ccf-last-summers-woods-ban-was-unlawful/
Canadian Constitution Foundation
Nova Scotia court agrees with CCF: last summer's woods ban was unlawful - Canadian Constitution Foundation
HALIFAX – On Friday, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia issued a decision finding that the 2025 ban on entering the woods to prevent forest fires was
👍7❤2
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
‼️BRACE YOURSELF CANADA‼️
918 Gazans have been allowed into Canada — the only country in the world to waive immigration rules — regardless of eligibility.
Adults received $3,000. Children $1,500. They were also given free health care, work permits, and language education.
BUT WAIT. THERE’S MORE...
At first, Gazan families sued Canada over visa application delays.
Then it escalated.
Grateful Gazans are currently suing CANADA over the war “Palestinians” started in Gaza. 😠
They must truly love and appreciate this nation.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1596149174828744
#CanadaFirst
918 Gazans have been allowed into Canada — the only country in the world to waive immigration rules — regardless of eligibility.
Adults received $3,000. Children $1,500. They were also given free health care, work permits, and language education.
BUT WAIT. THERE’S MORE...
At first, Gazan families sued Canada over visa application delays.
Then it escalated.
Grateful Gazans are currently suing CANADA over the war “Palestinians” started in Gaza. 😠
They must truly love and appreciate this nation.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1596149174828744
#CanadaFirst
👎9👍1
Forwarded from News from Clown World
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Leftists: "No one is trying to push a 🏳️🌈 agenda onto children!".
Meanwhile at Netflix:
Meanwhile at Netflix:
❤2👍2🤔1🤮1
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
Friends, we are taking a vacation tonight, so no Zoom!
We'll be back next week with special guest "Peace Man", Dana-Lee Melfi for an update on his continuing investigation into the misconduct and fraud committed by various police services during the 2022 Convoy.
If you missed Dana's first appearance on the Friday Zoom, you can watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v74hcsw-s4t-sunday-special-jan-18th-one-man-crusade.html
And check out his site to get familiar with Dana's work, http://Peace-Man.ca
And you can watch all the Zoom replays on our Rumble channel HERE: https://rumble.com/user/Stand4THEE
Have a great weekend and we'll see you then!
😊
We'll be back next week with special guest "Peace Man", Dana-Lee Melfi for an update on his continuing investigation into the misconduct and fraud committed by various police services during the 2022 Convoy.
If you missed Dana's first appearance on the Friday Zoom, you can watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v74hcsw-s4t-sunday-special-jan-18th-one-man-crusade.html
And check out his site to get familiar with Dana's work, http://Peace-Man.ca
And you can watch all the Zoom replays on our Rumble channel HERE: https://rumble.com/user/Stand4THEE
Have a great weekend and we'll see you then!
😊
👍4❤1
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
Facebook
688K views · 28K reactions | The three most powerful words in...
The three most powerful words in politics.
👍3
Forwarded from John Cipolla
Justice for Jonas is in front of Justice Gibson, SCJ Kitchener this Wednesday April 29, 2026 at 10am EST for a contempt hearing b/c John chooses to respect his father’s (Jonas) wish to live with John (rather than comply with Justice Sweeny’s unlawful order for John to kidnap Jonas and return him to a facility.
Pls find attached 6 criminal private prosecutions filed today by Jonas against all criminal co-conspirators- Justice Sweeny, Michael Jaeger Esq., Clarke Melville Esq., Donna & Darin Victor, and Daryl Hunter.
The “Justice for Jonas” Contempt zoom hearing (for not complying with Justice Sweeny's, (SRJ) SCJ, Kitchener), unlawful Order (a judge can not lawfully order John to assault and kidnap his father)
is this Thursday 10am EST.- see zoom link below.
https://ca01web.zoom.us/j/62176901537?pwd=M0tQWmZXZUV2WW94eC9RM0FzVTI5UT09
https://www.rebelnews.com/state_sponsored_kidnapping_opp_try_and_fail_to_remove_a_102_year_old_man_from_his_beloved_home
It appears Justice Paul Sweeny, Superior Court of Justice (SCJ) Kitchener, and Ontario attorneys Michael Jaeger Esq. and Clarke Melville Esq. have been caught in a criminal conspiracy to defraud a 102 yr old man with capacity (predatory Guardianship). Moreover, it appears Justice Sweeny want Jonas returned to Fairview facility to eventually be MAIDED (state sponsored euthanasia). This is exactly why police must do their own investgation and not follow judge’s unlawful orders blindly! The OPP got this one right- thank god. pls share virally.
Pls find attached 6 criminal private prosecutions filed today by Jonas against all criminal co-conspirators- Justice Sweeny, Michael Jaeger Esq., Clarke Melville Esq., Donna & Darin Victor, and Daryl Hunter.
The “Justice for Jonas” Contempt zoom hearing (for not complying with Justice Sweeny's, (SRJ) SCJ, Kitchener), unlawful Order (a judge can not lawfully order John to assault and kidnap his father)
is this Thursday 10am EST.- see zoom link below.
https://ca01web.zoom.us/j/62176901537?pwd=M0tQWmZXZUV2WW94eC9RM0FzVTI5UT09
https://www.rebelnews.com/state_sponsored_kidnapping_opp_try_and_fail_to_remove_a_102_year_old_man_from_his_beloved_home
It appears Justice Paul Sweeny, Superior Court of Justice (SCJ) Kitchener, and Ontario attorneys Michael Jaeger Esq. and Clarke Melville Esq. have been caught in a criminal conspiracy to defraud a 102 yr old man with capacity (predatory Guardianship). Moreover, it appears Justice Sweeny want Jonas returned to Fairview facility to eventually be MAIDED (state sponsored euthanasia). This is exactly why police must do their own investgation and not follow judge’s unlawful orders blindly! The OPP got this one right- thank god. pls share virally.
Zoom
Join our Cloud HD Video Meeting
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise cloud communications.
Forwarded from World Patriot News Network (🇨🇦Sharon)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎1
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
‼️Stand4THEE Friday Zoom at 8PM (EST)‼️
Busy week. Here's where we're at.
Laurie filed an injunction in Nanaimo to stop the electoral boundary extension before it kicks in. She wants a judge to actually review how this got pushed through, the AAP usage, the expansion onto federal reserve land, all of it.
Kimberly's SOF case got tossed in small claims. She's contesting it. The judge ignored court rules, and between the way things were handled and Mr. Horn's attitude, it felt like the decision was made before she walked in. She'll break down what happened and where it goes from here.
Rebecca's judicial review regarding Bill C-3 was rejected for being late, except Crown counsel had already accepted late service. So now we're filing a motion for a time extension. Not over yet!
The battle continues. See you at 8.
Zoom:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/v799w7q-s4t-friday-zoom-may-1st-.html
Busy week. Here's where we're at.
Laurie filed an injunction in Nanaimo to stop the electoral boundary extension before it kicks in. She wants a judge to actually review how this got pushed through, the AAP usage, the expansion onto federal reserve land, all of it.
Kimberly's SOF case got tossed in small claims. She's contesting it. The judge ignored court rules, and between the way things were handled and Mr. Horn's attitude, it felt like the decision was made before she walked in. She'll break down what happened and where it goes from here.
Rebecca's judicial review regarding Bill C-3 was rejected for being late, except Crown counsel had already accepted late service. So now we're filing a motion for a time extension. Not over yet!
The battle continues. See you at 8.
Zoom:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/v799w7q-s4t-friday-zoom-may-1st-.html