Forwarded from AffPapa! Клуб спящих бизнесменов! Потрачено!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Пока все выжимают последнее из гемблы и нутры — рядом разгоняется вертикаль, где конкуренции почти нет.
GOLOVE.AI Partners — прямой рекл, свой AI Girlfriend продукт, никаких посредников.
💰CPA до $60 за FTP или 60% RevShare без понижения. Ежененедельные выплаты от 100$. Гео - WW, источники любые. Личный менеджер, помощь с запуском, инсайды от баинга — заходишь не в одиночку.
Связки здесь еще живут неделями, а не сгорают за пару дней, как в перегретых офферах. Кто заходит первым, тот и снимает сливки, пока рынок не устоялся.
📢Подписывайся на наш телеграм канал, что быть первым, кто узнаёт о новостях партнерки и акциях для вебов
👉Регистрируйся и забирай доступ к офферу, условия уже ждут
GOLOVE.AI Partners — прямой рекл, свой AI Girlfriend продукт, никаких посредников.
💰CPA до $60 за FTP или 60% RevShare без понижения. Ежененедельные выплаты от 100$. Гео - WW, источники любые. Личный менеджер, помощь с запуском, инсайды от баинга — заходишь не в одиночку.
Связки здесь еще живут неделями, а не сгорают за пару дней, как в перегретых офферах. Кто заходит первым, тот и снимает сливки, пока рынок не устоялся.
📢Подписывайся на наш телеграм канал, что быть первым, кто узнаёт о новостях партнерки и акциях для вебов
👉Регистрируйся и забирай доступ к офферу, условия уже ждут
Jasper vs Claude: 500 product descriptions, edit time cut 60%
E-commerce affiliate needed 500 unique product blurbs. Hand-writing was ~10 min each (83 hours). We tested both for bulk drafts.
Jasper ($49/mo Creator, then $69 Pro)
👍 Brand Voice + templates kept tone consistent across all 500; bulk workflows built in
👎 Per-seat pricing climbs fast; output sometimes generic, needed a fact-check pass
Claude (API ~$3-15 / million tokens, or $20/mo Pro)
👍 Far cheaper at volume via API; tighter, less fluffy drafts that needed lighter editing
👎 No native bulk UI — we scripted it ourselves, which non-coders can't do
Claude via a simple script drafted all 500 for under $15 in API cost; editing dropped to ~4 min each (60% less). Jasper was faster to set up but ~5x the cost at this volume.
Verdict: Pick Jasper for a no-code branded UI, Claude's API if you can script and want cheap volume.
Best for: Jasper = marketers without devs; Claude = teams comfortable with the API.
No affiliate link — we just use this stuff.
E-commerce affiliate needed 500 unique product blurbs. Hand-writing was ~10 min each (83 hours). We tested both for bulk drafts.
Jasper ($49/mo Creator, then $69 Pro)
👍 Brand Voice + templates kept tone consistent across all 500; bulk workflows built in
👎 Per-seat pricing climbs fast; output sometimes generic, needed a fact-check pass
Claude (API ~$3-15 / million tokens, or $20/mo Pro)
👍 Far cheaper at volume via API; tighter, less fluffy drafts that needed lighter editing
👎 No native bulk UI — we scripted it ourselves, which non-coders can't do
Claude via a simple script drafted all 500 for under $15 in API cost; editing dropped to ~4 min each (60% less). Jasper was faster to set up but ~5x the cost at this volume.
Verdict: Pick Jasper for a no-code branded UI, Claude's API if you can script and want cheap volume.
Best for: Jasper = marketers without devs; Claude = teams comfortable with the API.
No affiliate link — we just use this stuff.
Before buying any SaaS tool, run it against three questions: what manual process does this replace, how much time does that process take per week, and does the tool's annual cost stay below 30% of the value of that time?
Most SaaS purchases fail this test. The tool replaces something that took 2 hours a week. The subscription costs $200/month — $2,400/year. If your time is worth $150/hour, you're spending $2,400 to save $15,600 in time. That's a good deal.
But if the "process" it replaces is something you checked once a month for 15 minutes, that math falls apart fast. Multiply $150/hour by 3 hours per year and you get $450 in saved time. The $200/month tool costs you $1,950 per year net.
Webmaster tool stacks accumulate this way — one tool at a time, each one justified individually, collectively adding up to a monthly bill that eats margin. Audit your stack every quarter. Cut tools that fail the 30% test.
Most SaaS purchases fail this test. The tool replaces something that took 2 hours a week. The subscription costs $200/month — $2,400/year. If your time is worth $150/hour, you're spending $2,400 to save $15,600 in time. That's a good deal.
But if the "process" it replaces is something you checked once a month for 15 minutes, that math falls apart fast. Multiply $150/hour by 3 hours per year and you get $450 in saved time. The $200/month tool costs you $1,950 per year net.
Webmaster tool stacks accumulate this way — one tool at a time, each one justified individually, collectively adding up to a monthly bill that eats margin. Audit your stack every quarter. Cut tools that fail the 30% test.
The difference between a tool you use and a tool you pay for is larger than you'd expect.
After running audits on multiple affiliate and webmaster operations, a consistent pattern appears: 40–60% of the tools being paid for are used less than once per month. Some are opened zero times after the first week of the trial.
This happens because of how SaaS tools are evaluated: during a trial, you're motivated to explore features. After purchase, you return to your default workflow. The tool sits idle.
Before renewing any annual subscription, check your actual usage logs. Most tools show this in account settings — last login dates, feature usage statistics, API call volume. If you can't remember the last time you opened it, you don't need it.
Better policy: default to monthly billing for the first 3 months of any new tool. Only switch to annual (and the discount) after you've used it at least twice per week for two consecutive months. The discount isn't worth the lock-in if usage drops off.
After running audits on multiple affiliate and webmaster operations, a consistent pattern appears: 40–60% of the tools being paid for are used less than once per month. Some are opened zero times after the first week of the trial.
This happens because of how SaaS tools are evaluated: during a trial, you're motivated to explore features. After purchase, you return to your default workflow. The tool sits idle.
Before renewing any annual subscription, check your actual usage logs. Most tools show this in account settings — last login dates, feature usage statistics, API call volume. If you can't remember the last time you opened it, you don't need it.
Better policy: default to monthly billing for the first 3 months of any new tool. Only switch to annual (and the discount) after you've used it at least twice per week for two consecutive months. The discount isn't worth the lock-in if usage drops off.
Forwarded from AFF.TOP
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
За что Telegram удаляли из App Store
Telegram временно удалили из App Store из-за массовых жалоб на запрещённый контент, который использовали для шантажа админов. После удаления ролика приложение вернули, но кейс показал уязвимость платформы: массовые доносы и подставы будут расти, а Telegram и владельцам чатов придётся усиливать модерацию и автоудаление медиа.
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/za-chto-telegram-udaliali-iz-app-store
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Telegram временно удалили из App Store из-за массовых жалоб на запрещённый контент, который использовали для шантажа админов. После удаления ролика приложение вернули, но кейс показал уязвимость платформы: массовые доносы и подставы будут расти, а Telegram и владельцам чатов придётся усиливать модерацию и автоудаление медиа.
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/za-chto-telegram-udaliali-iz-app-store
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top