ALL ORGANIZATION-DEPENDANT TECHNOLOGY MUST BE ABOLISHED

Many anti-civ ideologies like anarcho-communism that is cloaked in the false generosity of ecologism, argue that not all technology is inherently bad and can instead serve a use to "protect" humans and the natural environment. Already there are many flaws one can point out with this. "Bad" technology cannot be separated from the supposed "good" because modern technology is an interconnected system in which every part depends on the other. Technologies that seem beneficial like medicine or communication tools rely on the same industrial infrastructure that produces harmful or oppressive technologies. This essentially means that you cannot keep one without also sustaining the system.
All organization-dependant technology ends up enroaching on human freedom.

"Unlike you I am not confident that civilization will go down in the reasonably near future. Even just the elimination of the technoindustrial system is very problematic, and we must exert ourselves to the utmost in an effort to assure that it will happen. That is why I strongly disagree with your statement that “it is our primary task” to see that civilization goes down “at a minimum cost to human…life.” I think we have a desperate struggle ahead of us, and if we pull our punches we are sure to lose. Here’s what will happen if we worry about conserving human life: Suppose the system is on the brink of collapse. Do we give it a push, or do we scramble to keep things together so that the system will survive? You presumably realize what will happen if the system collapses: There won’t be any fuel or spare parts for farm machinery, there won’t be any of the pesticides or artificial fertilizers on which modern agriculture has become dependent, and the trucks and trains won’t be running to transport any food that is produced to the places where it’s needed. Consequently, people won’t have enough to eat. Not to mention other necessities such as clothing, fuel for heating and cooking, or potable water. There probably will be fighting over food and other scarce resources. That’s why the collapse of the technoindustrial system will probably unleash aggressive and competitive impulses. Also male dominance, since men for obvious reasons tend to assume leadership in a fighting situation".

- Theodore John Kaczynski (Kaczynski letter to Derrick Jensen | 1998 • no date)

𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙁𝙄𝙉𝘼𝙇 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙊𝙇𝙐𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉

"If we are ever to get rid of the system, we will have to accept the consequences. The human race will have to pass through fire. When a species becomes too numerous, typically it reaches a point where it suffers a sudden population collapse through starvation, epidemic, or whatever. The human race should be subject to the same law".

- Theodore John Kaczynski (Kaczynski letter to Derrick Jensen | 1998)

The system will inevitably destroy itself, but do not take this a sense of security. The collapse may be hindered by opposing forces that will try to reinforce the defense of the techno-industrial system. The collapse will only happen when the system is sufficiently unstable, and our movement strong enough to strike. We will have to out-recruit the rival groups. That is, we have to try to get more people on our side than they have.

"A great revolution is brewing. What this means is that the necessary preconditions for revolution are being created. Whether the revolution will become a reality will depend on the courage, determination, persistence, and effectiveness of revolutionaries".

- Theodore John Kaczynski (The Road To Revolution)

Contrary to what some politically correct scientists will tell you,the reason why human population is increasing is largely due to the industrial progress and the increase in food production in particular. I can't stop hearing about the idea(raised by social justice "environmenalists") that we somehow will help the environment if we find a way to feed all the people on Earth, which is impossible. Even if we somehow manage to feed all the excess population in the world we will not solve the world hunger , because these populations, following natural reproduction dynamics, will increase,due to the available new resources. The only way to stop the unnatural human growth is to destroy the means that create or transport food supply! This is not Misanthropy,this reality!

ANTI-TECH APOSTLES🛠️ WANTS YOU, TO JOIN THE FRONT AGAINST TECHNOLOGY!

We are seeking dedicated individuals who are willing to work on the field, spreading posters and other forms of activism.
We are also seeking editors and visuals artists who can help promote the spread of our movement by expressing our ideas through digital art and other stuff of the like.

t.me/someprofessionals

Modern society is intricately, and carefully designed to create the perfect population of slaves.

The majority of a child's life is spent being stuck in the education system. Take the children away from their parents, and the state raises you children instead. What this does is that it makes the children much more susceptible to programming / brainwashing for the reason that a child is much more comfortable being around their parents, and less afraid to ask questions. If you take a child away from their parents, and replace them with a figure of authority, they will unconsciously adapt and become more obedient.

First poster i have ever made. Feel free to download and distribute.

t.me/someprofessionals

If you want people to listen, you can't just tap them on the shoulder anymore, you have to hit them with a sledgehammer.

WHEN WILL THE SYSTEM COLLAPSE?

The system will collapse no matter what, because of internal contradictions and growing complexity. In simpler terms, the system will destroy itself.

The collapse might happen relatively soon (within decades) or even much later. The exact timing is impossible to know, one can only speculate as of now. However, the collapse of the system might also be delayed because of certain reforms that may change the societal structure, but this would only make the breakdown more catastrophic. The sooner the system collapses, the less suffering.

"Never before have people been so infantalized, made so dependant on the machine for everything; as the earth rapidly approaches its extinction due to technology, our souls are shrunk and flattened by its pervasive rule. Any sense of wholeness and freedom can only return by the undoing of the massive division of labour at the heart of technological progress".

- John Zerzan

Many people from different countries around the world are starting to notice the acceleration of Industrial society. Some think it's only a part of it like the economic system(so called capitalism) or the decline of culture and traditional lifestyle (liberalism) but it's major degradation and acceleration of all spheres of modern life including technological and ecological. Whenever you stumble across such people (in the internet or in real life), point them to the right direction,in other words to the inevitable end of Technological society and why we should accelerate it if we want human race and the biosphere to survive!

If animals all of a sudden started killing themselves, and if they have significant increased rates of depression, aswell as isolating themselves even though they are social creatures, we would beg the question: "What is wrong with the environment?" But we do not ask that question when humans are subject of the same social phenomenons.

In primitive times, severe depression and melancholia was rare, and suicide, the "concept" of killing onself almost unheard of. Since the industrial revolution and the progression of modern technology, widespread psychological suffering has become a totally common state of being for mankind. Technology started trapping us into meaningless lives. It started shaping our environment, our desires, our habits, and then convinced us that we chose it all freely. It programmed our minds in the image of the machine,. It trained us to crave constant stimulation over meaning and convenience over autonomy.

𝙏𝙀𝘿 𝙆𝘼𝘾𝙕𝙔𝙉𝙎𝙆𝙄 𝙒𝘼𝙎 𝙍𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏

God Yuletid / Merry Christmas, my anti-tech bro's❤️