As children, we were given books in ready-made forms. The book was always right, curiosity and thinking outside of the education board's framework was frowned upon. As teens, were were taught subjects we did not want to learn. When we became depressed and hopelessness, society offered us antidepressant drugs instead of removing the conditions that make people depressed.
We were born in a world where we are told to follow schedules and abide by laws that shape and mould us into obedient pawns. Nobody ever stopped to ask whether or not we enjoyed the life given to us.
Many people do not understand the root of their own frustration, hence they are directionless. We learn that there is much more to life and the system is at fault.
We were born in a world where we are told to follow schedules and abide by laws that shape and mould us into obedient pawns. Nobody ever stopped to ask whether or not we enjoyed the life given to us.
Many people do not understand the root of their own frustration, hence they are directionless. We learn that there is much more to life and the system is at fault.
β€28β€βπ₯3
"Imagine an alcoholic sitting with a barrel of wine in front of him. Suppose he starts saying to himself, βWine isnβt bad for you if used in moderation. Why, they say small amounts of wine are even good for you! It wonβt do me any harm if I take just one little drink....β Well, you know what is going to happen. Never forget that the human race with technology is just like an alcoholic with a barrel of wine".
- Theodore John Kaczynski (ISAIF - Strategy | paragraph; 203)
- Theodore John Kaczynski (ISAIF - Strategy | paragraph; 203)
β€18π₯6π2
ππ πππππΏ π½π π½πππππ ππ πΏπππ πππ πππππ ππππππππ ππππππ πΌππΏ ππΌππ πππ πΎπππππππππΎππ
β Theodore John Kaczynski
β Theodore John Kaczynski
π22β€8π―6β€βπ₯2
Many radicals tend to fall into the temptation of focusing on non-essential issues of the system such as racism, sexism et cetera. This is a grave mistake to make if your enemy is the state. You are fighting the system at its own terms because you are targeting specific "issues" that they can afford a compromise on.
Instead, it is the system itself that you want to break, otherwise it becomes a vicious cycle of continuous compromises that will not have any real impact on technological mechanics of the system.
Instead, it is the system itself that you want to break, otherwise it becomes a vicious cycle of continuous compromises that will not have any real impact on technological mechanics of the system.
π12β€1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ALL ORGANIZATION-DEPENDANT TECHNOLOGY MUST BE ABOLISHED
Many anti-civ ideologies like anarcho-communism that is cloaked in the false generosity of ecologism, argue that not all technology is inherently bad and can instead serve a use to "protect" humans and the natural environment. Already there are many flaws one can point out with this. "Bad" technology cannot be separated from the supposed "good" because modern technology is an interconnected system in which every part depends on the other. Technologies that seem beneficial like medicine or communication tools rely on the same industrial infrastructure that produces harmful or oppressive technologies. This essentially means that you cannot keep one without also sustaining the system.
All organization-dependant technology ends up enroaching on human freedom.
Many anti-civ ideologies like anarcho-communism that is cloaked in the false generosity of ecologism, argue that not all technology is inherently bad and can instead serve a use to "protect" humans and the natural environment. Already there are many flaws one can point out with this. "Bad" technology cannot be separated from the supposed "good" because modern technology is an interconnected system in which every part depends on the other. Technologies that seem beneficial like medicine or communication tools rely on the same industrial infrastructure that produces harmful or oppressive technologies. This essentially means that you cannot keep one without also sustaining the system.
All organization-dependant technology ends up enroaching on human freedom.
β€13π₯3π1
π₯14β€βπ₯1π1
"Unlike you I am not confident that civilization will go down in the reasonably near future. Even just the elimination of the technoindustrial system is very problematic, and we must exert ourselves to the utmost in an effort to assure that it will happen. That is why I strongly disagree with your statement that βit is our primary taskβ to see that civilization goes down βat a minimum cost to humanβ¦life.β I think we have a desperate struggle ahead of us, and if we pull our punches we are sure to lose. Hereβs what will happen if we worry about conserving human life: Suppose the system is on the brink of collapse. Do we give it a push, or do we scramble to keep things together so that the system will survive? You presumably realize what will happen if the system collapses: There wonβt be any fuel or spare parts for farm machinery, there wonβt be any of the pesticides or artificial fertilizers on which modern agriculture has become dependent, and the trucks and trains wonβt be running to transport any food that is produced to the places where itβs needed. Consequently, people wonβt have enough to eat. Not to mention other necessities such as clothing, fuel for heating and cooking, or potable water. There probably will be fighting over food and other scarce resources. Thatβs why the collapse of the technoindustrial system will probably unleash aggressive and competitive impulses. Also male dominance, since men for obvious reasons tend to assume leadership in a fighting situation".
- Theodore John Kaczynski (Kaczynski letter to Derrick Jensen | 1998 β’ no date)
- Theodore John Kaczynski (Kaczynski letter to Derrick Jensen | 1998 β’ no date)
π€10
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πππ ππππΌπ ππππππππππ
"If we are ever to get rid of the system, we will have to accept the consequences. The human race will have to pass through fire. When a species becomes too numerous, typically it reaches a point where it suffers a sudden population collapse through starvation, epidemic, or whatever. The human race should be subject to the same law".
- Theodore John Kaczynski (Kaczynski letter to Derrick Jensen | 1998)
"If we are ever to get rid of the system, we will have to accept the consequences. The human race will have to pass through fire. When a species becomes too numerous, typically it reaches a point where it suffers a sudden population collapse through starvation, epidemic, or whatever. The human race should be subject to the same law".
- Theodore John Kaczynski (Kaczynski letter to Derrick Jensen | 1998)
π₯11β€βπ₯4π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The system will inevitably destroy itself, but do not take this a sense of security. The collapse may be hindered by opposing forces that will try to reinforce the defense of the techno-industrial system. The collapse will only happen when the system is sufficiently unstable, and our movement strong enough to strike. We will have to out-recruit the rival groups. That is, we have to try to get more people on our side than they have.
β€8β€βπ₯6
"A great revolution is brewing. What this means is that the necessary preconditions for revolution are being created. Whether the revolution will become a reality will depend on the courage, determination, persistence, and effectiveness of revolutionaries".
- Theodore John Kaczynski (The Road To Revolution)
- Theodore John Kaczynski (The Road To Revolution)
β€15
Forwarded from ANTI TECH TALK
Contrary to what some politically correct scientists will tell you,the reason why human population is increasing is largely due to the industrial progress and the increase in food production in particular. I can't stop hearing about the idea(raised by social justice "environmenalists") that we somehow will help the environment if we find a way to feed all the people on Earth, which is impossible. Even if we somehow manage to feed all the excess population in the world we will not solve the world hunger , because these populations, following natural reproduction dynamics, will increase,due to the available new resources. The only way to stop the unnatural human growth is to destroy the means that create or transport food supply! This is not Misanthropy,this reality!
β€12
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ WANTS YOU, TO JOIN THE FRONT AGAINST TECHNOLOGY!
We are seeking dedicated individuals who are willing to work on the field, spreading posters and other forms of activism.
We are also seeking editors and visuals artists who can help promote the spread of our movement by expressing our ideas through digital art and other stuff of the like.
t.me/someprofessionals
We are seeking dedicated individuals who are willing to work on the field, spreading posters and other forms of activism.
We are also seeking editors and visuals artists who can help promote the spread of our movement by expressing our ideas through digital art and other stuff of the like.
t.me/someprofessionals
β€16
Modern society is intricately, and carefully designed to create the perfect population of slaves.
The majority of a child's life is spent being stuck in the education system. Take the children away from their parents, and the state raises you children instead. What this does is that it makes the children much more susceptible to programming / brainwashing for the reason that a child is much more comfortable being around their parents, and less afraid to ask questions. If you take a child away from their parents, and replace them with a figure of authority, they will unconsciously adapt and become more obedient.
The majority of a child's life is spent being stuck in the education system. Take the children away from their parents, and the state raises you children instead. What this does is that it makes the children much more susceptible to programming / brainwashing for the reason that a child is much more comfortable being around their parents, and less afraid to ask questions. If you take a child away from their parents, and replace them with a figure of authority, they will unconsciously adapt and become more obedient.
π9β€3