i've never been officially diagnosed with TMJ but I probably have it. wearing headphones for more than a few hours tends to make one of my ears hurt.
I've found a fix for this several months ago that has helped me a lot so I thought i'd share it.
when wearing overear headphones, adjusting them so that they do not sit tightly just below the bottom of the ear lobe and creating a gap so that air can pass freely into the ear cup mitigates the pain by at worst 90%. most days i feel no discomfort.
I create the air gap by disassembling a pen so that its basically a straw and then tucking it into the top of my ear lobe like you would with a pencil or glasses.
I've found a fix for this several months ago that has helped me a lot so I thought i'd share it.
when wearing overear headphones, adjusting them so that they do not sit tightly just below the bottom of the ear lobe and creating a gap so that air can pass freely into the ear cup mitigates the pain by at worst 90%. most days i feel no discomfort.
I create the air gap by disassembling a pen so that its basically a straw and then tucking it into the top of my ear lobe like you would with a pencil or glasses.
🤔1
recently (in the last 2 months or so) youtube has started showing me a lot of anti-israel content.
this is welcome, of course, but it raises a couple concerns
1. it is well known that google previously would intentionally suppress wrongthing. the biden administration got in trouble becuase it was revealed that the state department sent requests to many major platforms to suppress covid "misinformation", and many of those platforms acquiesced.
why did google remove suppression for anti-israel content? what shady string puller gave permission for israel to be hated?
2. i genuinely cannot tell if some of these people are right wing or left wing. The ones that speak strictly about israel either were previously right wing or if they were not, they completely adopted right wing vocabulary (zog, goy, etc). for speakers who do mention other topics, its still very difficult to tell because a lot of young democrats seem to have flipped on border control and now want less immigrants, and during covid a lot of democrat husbands bought their first firearms and suddenly became a lot less anti 2a.
this is welcome, of course, but it raises a couple concerns
1. it is well known that google previously would intentionally suppress wrongthing. the biden administration got in trouble becuase it was revealed that the state department sent requests to many major platforms to suppress covid "misinformation", and many of those platforms acquiesced.
why did google remove suppression for anti-israel content? what shady string puller gave permission for israel to be hated?
2. i genuinely cannot tell if some of these people are right wing or left wing. The ones that speak strictly about israel either were previously right wing or if they were not, they completely adopted right wing vocabulary (zog, goy, etc). for speakers who do mention other topics, its still very difficult to tell because a lot of young democrats seem to have flipped on border control and now want less immigrants, and during covid a lot of democrat husbands bought their first firearms and suddenly became a lot less anti 2a.
💯1
its me. im the IT guy. im going to drop kick you if you create a cascade/loopback on my network.
probably a decade ago i worked at a bank doing IT. it was awful. one day some bigwig manager came without telling anyone. he waltzed into the conference room where a phone was already plugged into eth/poe, plugged a second cable into the conference room phone (for no apparent reason) and then when his computer couldnt get a good network connection (because of the packet storm he created) just left, again without telling anyone. he didnt ask any other employees for help getting the internet working, he didnt come to me while i was onsite at the time it happened. he just strolled in, nuked the entire network, and rolled out.
i ended up physically checking every single eth wall socket in every single room on the entire floor twice before i thought to check the conference room because no one had been in there that day as far as anyone knew.
dumbass took out the whole company for about 4 hours. i still think about him from time to time and regret never getting the opportunity to pimp slap him for what he did.
probably a decade ago i worked at a bank doing IT. it was awful. one day some bigwig manager came without telling anyone. he waltzed into the conference room where a phone was already plugged into eth/poe, plugged a second cable into the conference room phone (for no apparent reason) and then when his computer couldnt get a good network connection (because of the packet storm he created) just left, again without telling anyone. he didnt ask any other employees for help getting the internet working, he didnt come to me while i was onsite at the time it happened. he just strolled in, nuked the entire network, and rolled out.
i ended up physically checking every single eth wall socket in every single room on the entire floor twice before i thought to check the conference room because no one had been in there that day as far as anyone knew.
dumbass took out the whole company for about 4 hours. i still think about him from time to time and regret never getting the opportunity to pimp slap him for what he did.
😁7
tldw:
datacenter people know that cities are not allowing DCs in because they dont want to deal with the increased power demand, increased power cost, and noise pollution
"new idea, lets just put the datacenter in everyone's front yard"
the business model: they partner with housing developers and HOAs to preinstall the unit, and then contractually require home buyers/renters to keep the unit in place, powered, and internet accessible. they are literally taking away the homeowners autonomy and decision making authority.
the teaser: they also install solar panels, a fancy "smart" power panel, and a whole house battery backup unit
the kick in the head: "excess power", which is literally just all of the amperage that you are not using gets drawn into the device. the solar panels will not keep up with power draw from the compute box. they provide nearly zero benefit to the homeowner. oh by the way the homeowner is on the hook for his own power bill. XFRA pay a portion of it but id bet 2:1 that they wont pay the full offset of the box.
the "whole house battery backup" is a farce too. The battery is used to keep the compute box running in a power outage and with 8 gpus and 4 threadrippers inside that thing will suck up all the stored power in no time.
they also use your home internet to connect the box, which means that they'll be slowing down the entire neighborhood by constantly transmitting.
so to summarize the trade deal: you get a massively powerful, very expensive, very noisy compute box in your front yard that you are not allowed to access and in return you get solar panels that are only really used to power the box, a whole house battery that is really only used to power the box, higher electricity bills, and slower internet
XFRA gets the whole sundae and the cherry on top.
dont like the deal? feels a bit raw? too bad, you cant buy (or more likely rent lmao) your dream home unless you agree to bend over for big corpos that hate you.
datacenter people know that cities are not allowing DCs in because they dont want to deal with the increased power demand, increased power cost, and noise pollution
"new idea, lets just put the datacenter in everyone's front yard"
the business model: they partner with housing developers and HOAs to preinstall the unit, and then contractually require home buyers/renters to keep the unit in place, powered, and internet accessible. they are literally taking away the homeowners autonomy and decision making authority.
the teaser: they also install solar panels, a fancy "smart" power panel, and a whole house battery backup unit
the kick in the head: "excess power", which is literally just all of the amperage that you are not using gets drawn into the device. the solar panels will not keep up with power draw from the compute box. they provide nearly zero benefit to the homeowner. oh by the way the homeowner is on the hook for his own power bill. XFRA pay a portion of it but id bet 2:1 that they wont pay the full offset of the box.
the "whole house battery backup" is a farce too. The battery is used to keep the compute box running in a power outage and with 8 gpus and 4 threadrippers inside that thing will suck up all the stored power in no time.
they also use your home internet to connect the box, which means that they'll be slowing down the entire neighborhood by constantly transmitting.
so to summarize the trade deal: you get a massively powerful, very expensive, very noisy compute box in your front yard that you are not allowed to access and in return you get solar panels that are only really used to power the box, a whole house battery that is really only used to power the box, higher electricity bills, and slower internet
XFRA gets the whole sundae and the cherry on top.
dont like the deal? feels a bit raw? too bad, you cant buy (or more likely rent lmao) your dream home unless you agree to bend over for big corpos that hate you.
👍1🌭1🤓1
a couple days ago i was working with a developer at my job. he is in the process of setting up a linux server to perform some work functions and he asked me if the company has a preferred linux distro he should use.
this led to a conversation about what distros we use in general (you really cannot expect anything else when you have two linux nerds in the same room). i said that i use omarchy which is arch based and when i saw the look on his face i had to quickly add "no no no im not one of THOSE arch users!"
this is verry funny to me
this led to a conversation about what distros we use in general (you really cannot expect anything else when you have two linux nerds in the same room). i said that i use omarchy which is arch based and when i saw the look on his face i had to quickly add "no no no im not one of THOSE arch users!"
this is verry funny to me
😁3👎1
> need to change billing info in ms365
> log in to portal and delete stale payment method
> its still there
> do it again
> its still there
"whatever, itll probably update tomorrow"
> check again tomorrow
> its still there
> delete it again
> its still there
i dont understand how a multibillion dollar international company can so consistently fail at such simple things.
> try to figure out if there is some black magic bs i have to do to remove it
> maybe theyre too stupid to have a working webui so i have to use powershell or something
> google
> "try another browser"
> open edge
> incognito
> go to 365
> it automatically signs me into my personal non-admin account because thats the account that i was logged into in my browser
> because thats the account i was logged into on my computer
> think about the fact that my personal computer account is also a web login
> fantasize about killing MS devs (i do this regularly)
the fact that it would do this specifically on incognito shows that MS does not actually understand on a fundamental level how users actually use their computers on a daily basis. the whole point of incognito (in a business environment) is to have a fresh browser with no active session cookies. why the fuck would they automatically populate session cookies when i am explicitly performing an action where i do not want that to happen.
devs must be punished for their insolence. we cannot have a functioning society until this happens.
> log in to portal and delete stale payment method
> its still there
> do it again
> its still there
"whatever, itll probably update tomorrow"
> check again tomorrow
> its still there
> delete it again
> its still there
i dont understand how a multibillion dollar international company can so consistently fail at such simple things.
> try to figure out if there is some black magic bs i have to do to remove it
> maybe theyre too stupid to have a working webui so i have to use powershell or something
> "try another browser"
> open edge
> incognito
> go to 365
> it automatically signs me into my personal non-admin account because thats the account that i was logged into in my browser
> because thats the account i was logged into on my computer
> think about the fact that my personal computer account is also a web login
> fantasize about killing MS devs (i do this regularly)
the fact that it would do this specifically on incognito shows that MS does not actually understand on a fundamental level how users actually use their computers on a daily basis. the whole point of incognito (in a business environment) is to have a fresh browser with no active session cookies. why the fuck would they automatically populate session cookies when i am explicitly performing an action where i do not want that to happen.
devs must be punished for their insolence. we cannot have a functioning society until this happens.
🔥2🥰1
i have a hot take
a couple months ago a bunch of short form content creators were complaining because youtube and instagram started adding some kind of "quality filter" to videos without the user's consent or knowledge which just made the whole video look ai generated. (and worse quality in general)
i think the point of this was not to make the platform better by making the videos better. i think the point of it was that if every video looks ai generated then its impossible to detect the videos that actually are ai generated. if this is achieved, it makes it much easier to push political slop fake news because people cant subconsciously filter ai opinions.
a couple months ago a bunch of short form content creators were complaining because youtube and instagram started adding some kind of "quality filter" to videos without the user's consent or knowledge which just made the whole video look ai generated. (and worse quality in general)
i think the point of this was not to make the platform better by making the videos better. i think the point of it was that if every video looks ai generated then its impossible to detect the videos that actually are ai generated. if this is achieved, it makes it much easier to push political slop fake news because people cant subconsciously filter ai opinions.
i bought a new phone over a year ago. the seller said that he used the phone for a short period of time for app testing before factory resetting and selling it. He said the phone never even left the house.
true to his word the phone he shipped me was in perfect physical condition. the only difference between it and a new phone was that the seals on the original sale packaging had been broken already.
today i started the process of switching to an esim and when i enabled the esim feature i found that it already has an esim installed
true to his word the phone he shipped me was in perfect physical condition. the only difference between it and a new phone was that the seals on the original sale packaging had been broken already.
today i started the process of switching to an esim and when i enabled the esim feature i found that it already has an esim installed
🔥2
apparently when you factory reset an android phone (or at least a pixel) it does not clear the esim profiles.
keep that in mind if you ever sell/trade in your phone
keep that in mind if you ever sell/trade in your phone
✍4
skipper's musings
CVE-2026-45498 "undefend" crazy how they will just lie to your face when the truth is one query away.
context:
a lot of software maintaining companies have bug bounties where if you find exploits you can report them to the company and they will pay you for it. its kind of an open bribe to hackers to make cash in a way that is not harmful or illegal. realistically there are a lot of people that do this work for the legal cash but would never immorally sell exploits to threat actors.
the microsoft security response center (MSRC) has been doing their normal microsoft thing of just being garbage in general and snubbing the guys who expect to get paid for their work. For example they claim that big ticket local privilege escalations are actually not actionable and wont fix, then next tuesday a patched gets quietly released with no recognition or payoff of the guy who found it. this is a double whammy because not only is the guy not getting paid, by not even recognizing him they are also hurting his career because he cant say "i found a major exploit in windows" on his resume.
recently a guy named nightmare-eclipse / chaotic-eclipse got really fed up with MS for snubbing him multiple times and dropped several very high value exploits. one of them is able to decrypt any bitlocker encrypted computer. its entirely possible that he found microsoft's bitlocker backdoor that was given to the FBI.
For this cve specifically NIST is calling this exploit, which completely disables defender antivirus, a Big Deal, because it is. microsoft on the other hand says "yeah i guess its something. we'll get around to patching next month."
a lot of software maintaining companies have bug bounties where if you find exploits you can report them to the company and they will pay you for it. its kind of an open bribe to hackers to make cash in a way that is not harmful or illegal. realistically there are a lot of people that do this work for the legal cash but would never immorally sell exploits to threat actors.
the microsoft security response center (MSRC) has been doing their normal microsoft thing of just being garbage in general and snubbing the guys who expect to get paid for their work. For example they claim that big ticket local privilege escalations are actually not actionable and wont fix, then next tuesday a patched gets quietly released with no recognition or payoff of the guy who found it. this is a double whammy because not only is the guy not getting paid, by not even recognizing him they are also hurting his career because he cant say "i found a major exploit in windows" on his resume.
recently a guy named nightmare-eclipse / chaotic-eclipse got really fed up with MS for snubbing him multiple times and dropped several very high value exploits. one of them is able to decrypt any bitlocker encrypted computer. its entirely possible that he found microsoft's bitlocker backdoor that was given to the FBI.
For this cve specifically NIST is calling this exploit, which completely disables defender antivirus, a Big Deal, because it is. microsoft on the other hand says "yeah i guess its something. we'll get around to patching next month."
🥱1👨💻1
The Porkchop Express
The city of London, the Vatican and the Freemasons made Trump do this performative legal challenge so that this thing that was already happening would keep happening!
no, i think he has a point.
there are organization like the the institute for justice, GOA, etc who's whole job is to just take cases pro bono with the intent to bring them to higher appeals courts and strike down laws they dont like.
they only take cases they think they will win not because they simply want to win, but because losing the case would be pretty devastating because it would mean the law has now been affirmed by an even higher court.
for the trump admin to take a case they KNOW they would lose all the way to the supreme court and then lose (as everyone expected) they have caused birthright citizenship to be affirmed by the highest court. for this to be struck down in the future by a court, it would require convincing the same supreme court to admit that their previous affirmation was incorrect, which wont happen.
there are organization like the the institute for justice, GOA, etc who's whole job is to just take cases pro bono with the intent to bring them to higher appeals courts and strike down laws they dont like.
they only take cases they think they will win not because they simply want to win, but because losing the case would be pretty devastating because it would mean the law has now been affirmed by an even higher court.
for the trump admin to take a case they KNOW they would lose all the way to the supreme court and then lose (as everyone expected) they have caused birthright citizenship to be affirmed by the highest court. for this to be struck down in the future by a court, it would require convincing the same supreme court to admit that their previous affirmation was incorrect, which wont happen.
👍1