TON itβs over β οΈ
π€·ββοΈ 3.3 million transactions per hour all day in EOS and everything is ok... (2019, since then it's ever better)
πΏ 2 million transactions TON πͺ¦β οΈπ the entire blockchain
Any more questions about EOS? I think not.
π€·ββοΈ 3.3 million transactions per hour all day in EOS and everything is ok... (2019, since then it's ever better)
πΏ 2 million transactions TON πͺ¦β οΈπ the entire blockchain
Any more questions about EOS? I think not.
Opinion. Is it important?
It depends on youπ΅οΈββοΈ
Imagine that Bitcoin, and not altcoins, will become the black swan (an exceptional unforeseen event) in crypto - everyone thinks that altcoins are the biggest scam in crypto.
Think about it. Gold is GOLD, but it will never repeat the total growth of stocks of various companies. Although, who would have thought that a century ago? "Gold is the head of everything" is now in the stack of narratives of the past at the church level: "the earth is definitely not round". The level of people's confidence in all the phenomena described is the same in every single historical period.
Bitcoin is now (potentially) like the Roman Empire, which should never be defeated... but... all empires die or become less strong than before β a living legacy of history.
The main idea is that we expect Bitcoin to be eternally glorious. We expect demand for Bitcoin ETFs. We expect the totemic rich people from the USA to buy Bitcoin, but for some reason we exclude that they are already in altcoins. We think that the words of exchange managers "I only hold Bitcoin globally" are very logical. At the same time, we forget that it was the same in previous historical examples. People did NOT doubt the arguments of the church that the earth was definitely not round. They believed that the gold standard would be eternal because bankers and government officials said so. We believe that Bitcoin or ETH is the chosen one because it is now.
It turns out that people are always wrong about global narratives.
Therefore, isn't it a rational approach not to follow the path of the masses? Wouldn't it be more rational to look for projects or phenomena that are out of the mainstream? At the same time, accepting the risks β you may just be unlucky.
The answer is obvious. YES! Because when we experience FOMO, what do we say? "Uh-oh, how come something that I didn't even look at grew up?
(that's why I have 0.000000 BTC but a lot of EOS and WBT π€·ββοΈ)
It depends on you
Imagine that Bitcoin, and not altcoins, will become the black swan (an exceptional unforeseen event) in crypto - everyone thinks that altcoins are the biggest scam in crypto.
Think about it. Gold is GOLD, but it will never repeat the total growth of stocks of various companies. Although, who would have thought that a century ago? "Gold is the head of everything" is now in the stack of narratives of the past at the church level: "the earth is definitely not round". The level of people's confidence in all the phenomena described is the same in every single historical period.
Bitcoin is now (potentially) like the Roman Empire, which should never be defeated... but... all empires die or become less strong than before β a living legacy of history.
The main idea is that we expect Bitcoin to be eternally glorious. We expect demand for Bitcoin ETFs. We expect the totemic rich people from the USA to buy Bitcoin, but for some reason we exclude that they are already in altcoins. We think that the words of exchange managers "I only hold Bitcoin globally" are very logical. At the same time, we forget that it was the same in previous historical examples. People did NOT doubt the arguments of the church that the earth was definitely not round. They believed that the gold standard would be eternal because bankers and government officials said so. We believe that Bitcoin or ETH is the chosen one because it is now.
It turns out that people are always wrong about global narratives.
Therefore, isn't it a rational approach not to follow the path of the masses? Wouldn't it be more rational to look for projects or phenomena that are out of the mainstream? At the same time, accepting the risks β you may just be unlucky.
The answer is obvious. YES! Because when we experience FOMO, what do we say? "Uh-oh, how come something that I didn't even look at grew up?
(that's why I have 0.000000 BTC but a lot of EOS and WBT π€·ββοΈ)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bitcoin to be or not... βοΈ
Imagine if the new ATH isn't very high, and global market-makers will only sell their $BTC to large funds (#BlackRock ) and put more money into altcoins?
I'm just thinking about scenarios because anything can happen β BE PREPARED!
Imagine if the new ATH isn't very high, and global market-makers will only sell their $BTC to large funds (#BlackRock ) and put more money into altcoins?
I'm just thinking about scenarios because anything can happen β BE PREPARED!
I published all the content on my main channel in Ukrainian:
https://t.me/sholi_crypto
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sold some WBT, this time to buy more PUNDIX.
First, the They Buy They Sell indicator on my service shows the purchases of influential market participants (in green). Red "signals" showed their sales on the market.
I remind you, the indicators are free for PUNDIX: open the chart (click)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM