The problem with stretching a word like "incitement" to give it the broadest possible application is that it can then be applied to your own lawful speech. If a conservative doesn't have to call for violence to be guilty of inciting it, neither does a leftist.
π269π₯74π11π’1
"Here is a quick and generally reliable rule . . . If people have always said it, it is probably true; it is the distilled wisdom of the ages. If people have not always said it, but everybody is saying it now, it is probably a lie; it is the concentrated madness of the moment."
β Anthony Esolen, Out of the Ashes
β Anthony Esolen, Out of the Ashes
π254π₯95π2
Sane people: "I don't think children should be sexualized, exploited, or mutilated."
Leftists: "You hear that? They want gays and trans people to die."
Leftists: "You hear that? They want gays and trans people to die."
π348π₯126π102
Here we have a call to violent action for the purpose of intimidation (i.e., terrorism) from @Esqueer_, a far-left transgender activist who accuses conservatives of incitement for thinking it's wrong to sexualize, exploit, and mutilate children.
It was deleted to cover tracks.
It was deleted to cover tracks.
π283π₯89π’40
The whole reason they're outraged is because Elon Musk is trying to restore free speech. If he were actually anti-free speech, they'd love him.
https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1595465889117339652?s=46&t=UoMmU4r_QAWKA6rKCUcLUw
https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1595465889117339652?s=46&t=UoMmU4r_QAWKA6rKCUcLUw
π264π85π₯48π’2
Our overpriced merch is on sale, knocking the cost down to where it should have been to begin with. You don't want to miss this deal!
https://shop.babylonbee.com/
https://shop.babylonbee.com/
π257π35
"They're a private company. They can do whatever the want."
*company does what it wants
"They must be destroyed."
*company does what it wants
"They must be destroyed."
π₯381π105π34π€£3