Imagine thinking it’s more dangerous to let free people speak than it is to let platforms with unprecedented power exercise authoritarian control over who can speak and what they can say.

Your ideas are dangerous, Sam. But at least you’re free to express them and be challenged.

Incitement: the act of speaking while being disliked by Democrats.

I wasn't talking about Jews, @EladNehorai. Why would you assume I was? We were locked in Twitter jail for 8 months for a joke about radical gender ideology. Other comedians have been canceled, and even physically attacked, for similar crimes.

https://twitter.com/eladnehorai/status/1594257325648662528?s=46&t=eEUYqNk7zu5gQaY1Tq4LvA

"It may be looking back, say ten years from now, that one of the most consequential decisions in the history of Big Tech may have been Twitter's snap decision to ban the Babylon Bee." — Tucker Carlson

The Bee will hit 2 million followers soon. We had 1.5 million when Twitter first locked us up.

We now have more followers, reach, and revenue than ever before — not because we acquiesced, but because we stubbornly refused to bend the knee for tyrants.

This definition could be applied to any public reporting about any objectionable event or behavior.

lol

This can't be right. Twitter died days ago.

I’m sure it will be a great piece of news satire without any comment from me.

Grooming is a behavior. I don’t care about the identity or orientation of the person engaging in it.

Normally we’re called bigots who want people to die whenever we object to children being sexualized. An apology is a refreshing change of pace.

On the definition of stochastic terrorism, calling someone a stochastic terrorist is stochastic terrorism.

Around a year ago, my critics were saying the Bee was going to die.

He hates that he loves Twitter.

Plot twist.

I've only gained 92,461 followers in the last 30 days. Twitter is dying.

If you’re bringing talking points on Thanksgiving, you are that uncle.

The problem with stretching a word like "incitement" to give it the broadest possible application is that it can then be applied to your own lawful speech. If a conservative doesn't have to call for violence to be guilty of inciting it, neither does a leftist.

I missed Adam Ford. Thankful to have him back!

"Here is a quick and generally reliable rule . . . If people have always said it, it is probably true; it is the distilled wisdom of the ages. If people have not always said it, but everybody is saying it now, it is probably a lie; it is the concentrated madness of the moment."

— Anthony Esolen, Out of the Ashes