It should definitely cost something to protect your tweets to avoid a ratio. Per-minute protection charge.
π142π₯23π12
You know where people are going to talk about the downfall of Twitter?
Twitter.
Twitter.
π451π₯47π6
Twitter wrestles with a dilemma created by their commitment to keeping these two promises:
1. "We will not censor anything truthful."
2. "We will censor hateful speech."
Statements like "Men who identify as women are not actually women" are objectively and obviously true, but deemed hateful by everyone on the Left. So whenever these statements are made, Twitter must choose between honoring one or the other promise. And truth always loses.
Here I'm looking at the problem from only one angle. Obviously there are other serious problems with their promise to not censor anything truthful. Beyond the fact that tech companies are terrible at determining what's true, free people have a right to be wrong.
1. "We will not censor anything truthful."
2. "We will censor hateful speech."
Statements like "Men who identify as women are not actually women" are objectively and obviously true, but deemed hateful by everyone on the Left. So whenever these statements are made, Twitter must choose between honoring one or the other promise. And truth always loses.
Here I'm looking at the problem from only one angle. Obviously there are other serious problems with their promise to not censor anything truthful. Beyond the fact that tech companies are terrible at determining what's true, free people have a right to be wrong.
π286π₯91
Tomorrow's election day. Go out and vote, even if you're a Calvinist.
π282π55π₯3