If hospital staff were sexually abusing teenage patients, would reporting on that abuse be considered "targeting" the hospital for threats of violence? If not, why not? How's that different from reporting that "gender-affirming" surgeries are being performed on healthy minors?

Check out the rest of my thread here:

https://twitter.com/sethdillon/status/1565807644581007360?s=21&t=Yt_oq5znNtktS1BnGpzNLw

What happened here?

Doctor poses for a picture with the child she just mutilated.

If we all kill ourselves, we can reduce health care costs and carbon emissions to zero.

“Real men drink White Claw.” — Elon Musk

Might sue you, too. We’ll see if you continue defaming her.

Libs of TikTok is extremely harmful. I’ll admit that. We’re dealing serious damage to the woke Left’s depraved campaign to confuse, corrupt, and cut up children.

One of those things you wish you were wrong about.

Taylor Lorenz also managed to write an entire article about threats against children's hospitals without mentioning that I'd put up a $20k cash reward for information leading to the arrest of whoever allegedly called in a bomb threat at Boston Children's.

Disgraceful.

I'll increase the reward to $30k if she tweets about it to let people know we're trying to find whoever's responsible.

It’s even worse than this. The confusion isn’t originating from the minds of these children; it’s being planted there. We are cultivating catastrophic confusion and then “treating” it with affirmation.

Nadal and Medvedev are out. Who still thinks Djokovic wouldn’t have won?

"Fletcher was a married mom of two young boys and an elementary school teacher."

Heartbreaking.

https://nypost.com/2022/09/05/body-found-in-search-for-tennessee-teacher-eliza-fletcher/

100 percent of straight men are unwilling to date gay men dressed as women.

Read this thread.

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1567290905039708160?s=21&t=pFjuGFw_OHL63fvsZQFSFQ

Good for them. But why are they the only ones I’m aware of who have done this?

“You’re okay with forced birth?” translates from crazy liberal speak to: “You’re okay with making sure babies get to live?”

Yes. Yes I am.

Do you hate trees? Well, you’re in luck. Our new book is printed on paper harvested from murdered trees.

Link to buy it now: https://t.co/JVcC98eyZR

If you can identify as female—i.e., if you can identify as having physical characteristics that you do not, in fact, have—then you can identify as anything. A white person can identify as black. A short person can identify as tall. An idiot, like Matt here, can identify as smart.

If being female has nothing to do with your biology—if it's just an identity—then what are you even identifying as? If anyone can belong to the category "female," then the term is utterly meaningless. It's just a synonym for "miscellaneous."

Never stop mocking this nonsense.

The future is here.

Pro-abortion arguments are primarily self-defense arguments. The baby is viewed as a threat to one's freedom, both physical and financial. And that potential for harm is what's supposed to justify lethal action.

This is obviously absurd. But it's
even worse when you consider that already-born children are actually—not just potentially—burdensome. If we apply the reasoning that's used to justify abortion to toddlers and teens, then we should be able to kill them in self-defense, too.