Do the libs who smear everyone who objects to grooming ever object to it themselves? Are they only ever angry if it's opposed? Do they think there are any lines that shouldn't be crossed when it comes to secretly influencing children's ideas about sex and gender?

At this point, you're far more likely to get banned by Big Tech for complaining about the sexualization of children than you are for engaging in it.

Sure it can. It's only funny if there's some truth to it.

*Man posts video of himself dressed in drag and dancing for children who stuff tips in his underwear.*

Twitter: Niiiccce.

*Other man comments "groomer" under the video of the drag queen performing for kids.*

Twitter: Take your hate somewhere else, bigot. This is a safe space.

The fact that condemning evil is now considered evil suggests that the current assault on free speech is more spiritual than political.

(marks self safe)

Sports can unite people with superficial differences. We do not have superficial differences.

Also, we're too fat to play pickleball.

There's also the men-in-women's-sports dilemma. The Right will object if men are allowed to play with women. The Left will object if men are barred from playing with women. So no matter which path pickleball takes on that issue, it'll only divide us further.

Yeah, that's pretty bad — but has anyone ever called this trans person a groomer?

This company is "horrified" that Libs of TikTok is permitted to do business on Shopify.

I'd like to know why they aren't horrified by the sexualization of children that Libs of TikTok exposes every day. Do they want as many children as possible to be confused and corrupted?

If nearly 200 teachers have been charged with sex crimes so far this year, how many are out there who just haven't been caught yet? And how many are actively building trust, grooming their underage victims for sex crimes down the road?

https://www.foxnews.com/us/181-k-12-educators-charged-child-sex-crimes-2022

And how much of the grooming takes place in the context of "educational" sex/gender discussions kept a secret from the parents? Are we allowed to ask that, or will our Big Tech overlords consider the question more dangerous and harmful than the grooming itself?

True.

The libs at Front who terminated our email service reached out this morning to ask how I prefer to receive the data they're still working on exporting for us.

My reply:

Go here and click the "hidden comments" icon. 🤣

https://twitter.com/fronthq/status/1551601955025420294?s=21&t=D4718NPyCq8g6Jzd9XQs9g

I don't automatically buy everything the media says about people they hate, Jake. Why do you?

https://twitter.com/jacobamccown/status/1551395415035199488?s=21&t=tKmvLs7Hg8vAuc9vTj8qpA

Is the first rule of grooming to not let anyone talk about grooming?

Why are they called preferred pronouns if they're required?

"When a man is getting better he understands more and more clearly the evil that is still left in him. When a man is getting worse he understands his own badness less and less. A moderately bad man knows he is not very good: a thoroughly bad man thinks he is alright." C.S. Lewis

I hear sometimes that Big Tech is actually biased in favor of conservatives. They cite the success of Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire, for example. But I can't think of anything Leftists believe but dare not say for fear of being banned.

We don’t need comedians; we have Democrats.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/top-senate-democratic-candidates-refuse-say-whether-men-can-get-pregnant-define-word-woman