We don't want the health policy banning unvaccinated foreigners to be ignored. We want it to be abolished.

Why are we requiring young, healthy people to get vaccinated before entering our country? Who does that benefit when the vaccine doesn't stop the spread? And what would they be spreading if they test negative?

This is asinine, anti-science policy.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/jul/20/us-open-novak-djokovic-covid-19-vaccine-tennis?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1658337729

If you want to keep getting COVID, keep getting shots.

The is not about fostering an environment of acceptance. It's about confusing and converting as many kids as possible.

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1549435348773736451?s=21&t=0EagsGGMYpKV04L-0954jQ

They've tried to by raising the cost of not being vaccinated so high that compliance is all but compelled. His refusal is rare—and highly admirable—for that reason.

What's moronic is celebrating freedom to choose while defending or excusing penalties for "wrong" choices.

These cowards are bragging about having one of the "safest spaces in the country."

If you love safe spaces, you hate diversity.

Belief in God could be described as wishful thinking or a "crutch" for the weak only if God doesn't exist. If he does exist, then it could just as easily be said that atheism is wishful thinking, born from a desire to not have to face God one day and be accountable to him.

Yes, and so has Biden himself. From a townhall in July of 2021: "You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations."

Brutal: Biden Contracts COVID Just One Day After Miraculous Recovery From Cancer

https://babylonbee.com/news/brutal-biden-contracts-covid-just-one-day-after-miraculous-recovery-from-cancer

No way.

Misinformation.

A procedure that is only successful if an innocent human dies is not safe.

Meanwhile, Twitter has begun suspending people for using the word "groomer."

Twitter can suspend millions of us—but they can't stop righteously indignant parents from demanding an end to grooming in their children's classrooms.

Starbucks became unsafe and unsanitary when they opened their stores/bathrooms to the public to prove they weren't racist. They got what they asked for.

Leftists assume every wall they see was built by bigots, so they tear them all down without thinking. Just feelings and chaos.

Opposing grooming isn't bigotry because grooming is a behavior, not an identity or orientation. Claire knows this. Twitter knows this. But they like the behavior and the results it produces, so they gladly lie to protect it.

“The vaccine will protect you from the thousands of unvaccinated fans attending the U.S. Open this year. But if Djokovic plays, you will die.” — Science

Do the libs who smear everyone who objects to grooming ever object to it themselves? Are they only ever angry if it's opposed? Do they think there are any lines that shouldn't be crossed when it comes to secretly influencing children's ideas about sex and gender?

At this point, you're far more likely to get banned by Big Tech for complaining about the sexualization of children than you are for engaging in it.

Sure it can. It's only funny if there's some truth to it.