Seth Dillon
6.99K subscribers
1.17K photos
59 videos
802 links
Download Telegram
This is how violence-loving leftists like @Esqueer_ operate. They'll accuse you of terrorism and incitement for merely mentioning a drag show ad. Then—in the next breath—they'll explicitly target individuals for harassment, saying they should be accosted and "never know peace."
🔥242👍46😢6
“I could care less” means “I care at least a little bit.”
🔥137👍54😁30
You expect none of those aggressive confrontations you’re calling for to turn violent? Good luck. You also said the justices should “never know peace.” All Chaya did was mention a publicly advertised event. She came nowhere near your level of instigation, you fiendish fraud.
👍219🔥54
According to this Harvard-educated lib, you have to be stupid to think accosting someone is threatening.

Just imagine how this person would react if someone called for them to be accosted every day in the street. Or even worse, imagine if they were misgendered.
👍168🔥47😁43
Musk hasn't tweeted in a week.
😢119👍23🔥17😁12
But why? Everything's been going so well.
🔥172😁87👍13
Gmail is routing PragerU emails to my spam folder.
😢161🔥38👍7😁2
This is funny because it's true. These guys are both rapists. And rapists don't benefit from abortion at all. Very good joke here.

https://twitter.com/theonion/status/1540391428710449155?s=21&t=tOAP4Lxj4IGeZ3Hwc2cEZQ
😁137🔥15👍5😢4
What’s the difference between saying the Supreme Court and its decisions are illegitimate and saying an election was illegitimate?
🔥312👍60
You think the Supreme Court's job is to honor "the will of the majority"?
😁332🔥84👍13
This tweet is a direct violation of the Twitter Rules against abusive behavior, specifically their policy against encouraging others to engage in targeted harassment.

It borders on a violation of the "violent threats" policy, which Twitter says will result in immediate and permanent suspension.
🔥370👍79
Google ads just emailed me to let me know they will be highlighting publishers from "underrepresented groups" in their marketplace. I don't qualify because I don't "self-identify" as gay, trans, black, or a woman.

Their marketplace was not discriminatory before, but it is now.

The self-identification thing is interesting, though. Programs like this incentivize people to identify as being part of an underrepresented group, whether they are or not. And you can't question their self-identification without being guilty of hateful conduct.
😢152🔥76😁43👍24
equity is evil
🔥282👍80😁4😢4
I don't have a lot in common with people who think it's bad when an adult prays on a football field after a game, but good when an adult performs in drag for children.
🔥358👍114😁7😢4
The uneven rule enforcement is by design. Twitter's report form says they only enforce their rules for "protected categories." The absurd result is what you see below.

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1541641656255905792?s=21&t=gSOEpodSb_iMlSpu2qyzHA
🔥133👍23😁3😢2
Here's the language that appears when you report incitement or targeted harassment. By limiting enforcement to these categories, Twitter has rigged the system so that "misgendering"—even in jest—is more egregious than explicit threats targeting sitting Supreme Court justices.

Twitter has thus equipped certain leftists with both a sword and a shield. They can target and threaten conservatives with impunity (views/values are not protected), while reporting you for hateful conduct (citing their identity) if you so much as joke about them in response.
🔥195👍32😢20😁2
My friend's brother-in-law says his neighbor overheard someone on the radio quote a person with inside knowledge but who wishes to remain anonymous say that this looks really bad.
😁407🔥37👍16😢3