Seth Dillon
βœ”
7K subscribers
1.17K photos
59 videos
802 links
Download Telegram
Abortion is healthcare the way rape is lovemaking.
πŸ”₯454πŸ‘90
Just don’t kill free speech or babies.
πŸ”₯255πŸ‘64😒1
More women are pro-life than men.
😁377πŸ‘74πŸ”₯29😒13
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Exclusive look inside a Ministry of Truth interrogation
πŸ‘117😁85πŸ”₯24😒6
Twitter's mission is "to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information, and to express their opinions and beliefs without barriers."

Elon Musk just wants to get back to the original intent of the platform and see that mission fulfilled.
πŸ‘312😒2
Harmful misinformation is telling a woman that abortion is a decision about her own body when another body and life is at stake.

Harmful misinformation is calling a baby a clump of cells.

Harmful misinformation is telling women that abortion, not child-rearing, is empowering.

Harmful misinformation is presenting abortion, not adoption, as the best answer to unwanted pregnancy.

Harmful misinformation is telling women they're better off living with the guilt of killing their preborn children than coping with financial hardship.
πŸ”₯406πŸ‘92😒6😁2
Harmful misinformation is the claim that we don't know when life begins.

Harmful misinformation is the claim that saving sex for marriage is shameful or foolish.
πŸ‘275πŸ”₯108😁1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Free speech does come at a cost, but it's worth it.
πŸ‘255πŸ”₯52😁2
This is like saying, "If you think child molestation is wrong, then don't molest a child."

Actions that harm others are morally significant; they are not matters of personal preference. To say that they are is to descend into relativistic moral madness and to give up one's ground for treating *anyone's* behavior as criminal, or even objectionable.

And if your reply is to say, "Well, I don't agree that abortion harms anyone," then you're just assuming what needs to be proved, namely that the unborn child is not a human life with intrinsic rights, dignity, and value.

Finally, this argument doesn't cite the Bible in either of its obviously true premises.

1. It is wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human.
2. Abortion intentionally kills an innocent human.
3. Therefore, abortion is wrong.
πŸ”₯411πŸ‘126
If aborted babies were merely clusters of cells, there’d be no reason for social media companies to censor images of their lifeless, mutilated bodies. The censorship is a tacit admission of the brutality and gruesomeness of the procedure.
πŸ‘403πŸ”₯122😒36
If you're going to link your employer's credit card to a personal Instacart account, you might want to spend a lot less than $5,000 a month. We noticed.

I don't even know how you spend that much on Instacart. Do they sell gas on there?
πŸ”₯187😁98πŸ‘22
You need a biologist to confirm you are indeed talking to a woman, and a team of scientists to tell you how to flirt with her.

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1522763253478268929?s=21&t=jjM22Z5mwyMDWog_MxDcRg
😁207πŸ‘13😒1
Toddlers are expensive, too. If we apply your reasoning consistently, then we should make it legal to murder toddlers because it's difficult for poor people to care for them.

These "arguments" from abortion fanatics always assume what needs to be proved, namely that the preborn child is somehow less humanβ€”and thus less deserving of care/protectionβ€”than the already-born child. But they're no less human. They're just a little smaller.
πŸ”₯447πŸ‘111😒9😁1
If? Get a load of this anti-trans bigot.
😁499πŸ”₯65πŸ‘17😒6
You do not have a right to not be offended. If you did, then that would mean someone else had lost their right to speak freely.
πŸ”₯312πŸ‘84😁7
Great. Now everyone will know I’m not a billionaire.
😁370πŸ”₯34πŸ‘11😒2