I've made the mistake of describing trans women as "biologically male" before. It's a stupid mistake. Maleness *is* biological. To say a person is "biologically male" implies that there is such a thing as a non-biological male. There isn't.

As for my use of the phrase "trans women," I don't think that's as problematic. To call a man who identifies as a woman a "trans woman" is to distinguish him from actual women. If he's really a woman, he's not trans. Their own language betrays them on that one. Point it out.

How many people has Twitter permanently banned for being right too soon?

The New York Post’s Twitter account was locked for weeks because they refused to delete tweets about this story.

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1504372738722521089?s=21

Again, it’s redundant to call him a biological male. There’s no such thing as a non-biological male, so there’s no need to ever use that qualifier.

https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1504476255239901186?s=21

Foiled again.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-myocarditis-babylonbee-idUSL2N2VJ2PZ

Pretty surreal to see this trending on the platform that worked so hard to suppress this story. Where's the apology for suppressing the truth as "disinformation" in an effort to sway an election?

When are women going to stand up for themselves and refuse to swim against men?

This only ends when women end it.

https://twitter.com/swipewright/status/1504586948400369671?s=21

Reality is a South Park episode.

If Lia Thomas were actually a woman, then I don't think anyone would be talking about his performance-enhancing testicles.

Their favorite mistake.

Reality becoming satire.

I just received this notice that we’ve been locked out of our account for “hateful conduct.”

We're told our account will be restored in 12 hours, but the countdown won't begin until we delete the tweet that violates the Twitter Rules.

We're not deleting anything. Truth is not hate speech. If the cost of telling the truth is the loss of our Twitter account, then so be it.

Twitter's statement to the media in response to our suspension: "The account you referenced has been temporarily locked for violating our hateful conduct policy. The account owner is required to delete the violative Tweet before regaining access to their account."

They could, of course, delete the tweet themselves. But they won't. It's not enough for them to just wipe it out. They want us to bend the knee and admit that we engaged in hateful conduct.

They didn't take our account down. They locked it — meaning we can't post any new tweets — until we delete our "violative tweet." We haven't deleted anything, and they haven't, either. The tweet they want us to delete is still up.

It's the word "man" that's problematic, not "male." They allow transgenders like Rachel Levine to be described as physically male. But they won't allow you to conclude that a person's maleness makes them a man. If Rachel self-identifies as a woman, then you must affirm that.

This is consistent with their false distinction between sex and gender.

I'm getting tagged by dozens of people saying they're reporting my personal account. Notices like this are starting to stream in.

The Left isn't interested in freedom or debate. They demand ideological conformity. Submit or they'll silence you.

Does she actually believe she's saying something, or is she just trying to fill the air with words until the little countdown clock in front of her tells her it's time to stop talking?

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1505966403375050763?s=21

One of the jobs of the satirist is to poke holes in the popular narrative, but Twitter’s rigging the system so you can only promote it. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to use comedy to speak truth to power.

I’ll be on Tucker tonight around 8:40 ET to discuss.

I’ll also be asking him why he only has me on when there’s a problem. Are we really friends, or is he just using me for ratings?