Seth Dillon
βœ”
6.98K subscribers
1.17K photos
59 videos
802 links
Download Telegram
I live in the free state of Florida. And I’m not a lib. This update does not apply to me.
πŸ”₯222πŸ‘46😁16😒7
Instead of replying to our email β€” or clicking the unsubscribe button at the bottom of it β€” he sent us a fax. πŸ˜‚
😁351πŸ‘11πŸ”₯10😒1
Is this what sexual harassment in the metaverse feels like?
😁266πŸ”₯28πŸ‘10😒2
"We all want progress, but if you are on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive." β€” C.S. Lewis

I'm a Lewisian progressive. I want to turn back.

https://twitter.com/tpostmillennial/status/1503898870459342851?s=21
πŸ‘198πŸ”₯56😒4
What happens if you get banned for "misgendering" someone who later detransitions? Do you get your account back for being right, or is it a permanent penalty like when they ban you for medical misinformation that later turns out to be true?
πŸ‘279😁69πŸ”₯66😒4
I've made the mistake of describing trans women as "biologically male" before. It's a stupid mistake. Maleness *is* biological. To say a person is "biologically male" implies that there is such a thing as a non-biological male. There isn't.

As for my use of the phrase "trans women," I don't think that's as problematic. To call a man who identifies as a woman a "trans woman" is to distinguish him from actual women. If he's really a woman, he's not trans. Their own language betrays them on that one. Point it out.
πŸ‘342πŸ”₯76😒1
How many people has Twitter permanently banned for being right too soon?
πŸ”₯357πŸ‘61😁15😒1
The New York Post’s Twitter account was locked for weeks because they refused to delete tweets about this story.

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1504372738722521089?s=21
πŸ”₯213πŸ‘9😁5
Again, it’s redundant to call him a biological male. There’s no such thing as a non-biological male, so there’s no need to ever use that qualifier.

https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1504476255239901186?s=21
πŸ‘128😒62πŸ”₯24😁3
Pretty surreal to see this trending on the platform that worked so hard to suppress this story. Where's the apology for suppressing the truth as "disinformation" in an effort to sway an election?
πŸ”₯306πŸ‘53
When are women going to stand up for themselves and refuse to swim against men?

This only ends when women end it.

https://twitter.com/swipewright/status/1504586948400369671?s=21
πŸ‘369πŸ”₯77😒34😁3
Reality is a South Park episode.
😒237πŸ”₯80😁42πŸ‘20
If Lia Thomas were actually a woman, then I don't think anyone would be talking about his performance-enhancing testicles.
😁410πŸ”₯89πŸ‘60
Their favorite mistake.
πŸ”₯254😁36πŸ‘18😒5
Reality becoming satire.
πŸ‘101😁39
I just received this notice that we’ve been locked out of our account for β€œhateful conduct.”
😁279πŸ”₯62😒28πŸ‘8
We're told our account will be restored in 12 hours, but the countdown won't begin until we delete the tweet that violates the Twitter Rules.
😁243πŸ”₯41😒35πŸ‘17
We're not deleting anything. Truth is not hate speech. If the cost of telling the truth is the loss of our Twitter account, then so be it.
πŸ”₯673πŸ‘255😒6
Twitter's statement to the media in response to our suspension: "The account you referenced has been temporarily locked for violating our hateful conduct policy. The account owner is required to delete the violative Tweet before regaining access to their account."

They could, of course, delete the tweet themselves. But they won't. It's not enough for them to just wipe it out. They want us to bend the knee and admit that we engaged in hateful conduct.
πŸ‘242πŸ”₯108😒7😁4