“Not very interesting. Usually overpriced, most of the time.” 😂

If you're on the fence about subscribing, please consider that at least some of the time, we are not overpriced.

Heading to the conference room for an important . . . meeting.

If moral progress is possible, then morality can't just be a social construct. Progress entails that some values are better than others. If morality were just a social construct—and not an objective feature of reality—then we'd have moral differences, but never improvements.

The objective moral standard cannot be improved, but your adherence to it can.

To say that one culture's morality is, in fact, better than another is to compare both of them to an objective standard that transcends them both. If such a standard exists, then God exists and morality is not a social construct but a bedrock fact of reality.

The fact that trans men can get pregnant is proof that they are women pretending to be men. It is not proof that men can get pregnant.

It is morally wrong to affirm another person's delusion.

"a record for women"

Who should we interview next?

I'd love to sit down with my friend @ConceptualJames and talk about God (and whether He exists). We should do that.

"Here is a quick and generally reliable rule to follow. If people have always said it, it is probably true; it is the distilled wisdom of the ages. If people haven't always said it, but everybody is saying it now, it is probably a lie; it is the . . . madness of the moment."

— Anthony Esolen, Out of the Ashes

If liberals really wanted to stop the spread of misinformation they'd censor themselves.

Define woman for me, then.

This one's not true (yet), Lucy.

Reuters: "The article making the false claim originated from satire website The Babylon Bee."

Is it a "false claim" if it originates from a satire site, or is it—what's the word I'm looking for—satire?

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pope-francis-covid19-vaccines-idUSL1N2UD21K

If you want proof that “misinformation” means “opinions Democrats don’t like,” just watch how Twitter handles nonsense like this.

A racist is a person Democrats don't like. Misinformation is an opinion Democrats don't like. Inclusivity is the exclusion of people and opinions Democrats don't like.

Stop defining "woman" in terms of genitals or child-bearing ability, you small-minded, science-denying bigots. Womanhood is sacred. It can't be reduced to what's between your legs.

A woman is anyone—with or without a penis—who wears lipstick, heels, and a dress.

Twitter's character limit is a good thing. Forced brevity challenges you to think harder about what you're saying and how you're saying it. I think it's made me a better writer, if that's even possible.

https://twitter.com/not_the_bee/status/1489375647424126976?s=21

Foiled by Reuters yet again.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-the-view-joe-rogan-idUSL1N2UE29T

If only there were something other than censorship that could be used to combat ideas we don’t like.