Offshore
ble names (no `temp`, `data`, `result` without context) <standard- Be direct about problems - Quantify when possible ("this adds ~200ms latency" not "this might be slower") - When stuck, say so and describe what you've tried - Don't hide uncertainty behind…
e going back to manual coding. TLDR everyone has their developing flow, my current is a small few CC sessions on the left in ghostty windows/tabs and an IDE on the right for viewing the code + manual edits.
Tenacity. It's so interesting to watch an agent relentlessly work at something. They never get tired, they never get demoralized, they just keep going and trying things where a person would have given up long ago to fight another day. It's a "feel the AGI" moment to watch it struggle with something for a long time just to come out victorious 30 minutes later. You realize that stamina is a core bottleneck to work and that with LLMs in hand it has been dramatically increased.
Speedups. It's not clear how to measure the "speedup" of LLM assistance. Certainly I feel net way faster at what I was going to do, but the main effect is that I do a lot more than I was going to do because 1) I can code up all kinds of things that just wouldn't have been worth coding before and 2) I can approach code that I couldn't work on before because of knowledge/skill issue. So certainly it's speedup, but it's possibly a lot more an expansion.
Leverage. LLMs are exceptionally good at looping until they meet specific goals and this is where most of the "feel the AGI" magic is to be found. Don't tell it what to do, give it success criteria and watch it go. Get it to write tests first and then pass them. Put it in the loop with a browser MCP. Write the naive algorithm that is very likely correct first, then ask it to optimize it while preserving correctness. Change your approach from imperative to declarative to get the agents looping longer and gain leverage.
Fun. I didn't anticipate that with agents programming feels *more* fun because a lot of the fill in the blanks drudgery is removed and what remains is the creative part. I also feel less blocked/stuck (which is not fun) and I experience a lot more courage because there's almost always a way to work hand in hand with it to make some positive progress. I have seen the opposite sentiment from other people too; LLM coding will split up engineers based on those who primarily liked coding and those who primarily liked building.
Atrophy. I've already noticed that I am slowly starting to atrophy my ability to write code manually. Generation (writing code) and discrimination (reading code) are different capabilities in the brain. Largely due to all the little mostly syntactic details involved in programming, you can review code just fine even if you struggle to write it.
Slopacolypse. I am bracing for 2026 as the year of the slopacolypse across all of github, substack, arxiv, X/instagram, and generally all digital media. We're also going to see a lot more AI hype productivity theater (is that even possible?), on the side of actual, real improvements.
Questions. A few of the questions on my mind:
- What happens to the "10X engineer" - the ratio of productivity between the mean and the max engineer? It's quite possible that this grows *a lot*.
- Armed with LLMs, do generalists increasingly outperform specialists? LLMs are a lot better at fill in the blanks (the micro) than grand strategy (the macro).
- What does LLM coding feel like in the future? Is it like playing StarCraft? Playing Factorio? Playing music?
- How much of society is bottlenecked by digital knowledge work?
TLDR Where does this leave us? LLM agent capabilities (Claude & Codex especially) have crossed some kind of threshold of coherence around December 2025 and caused a phase shift in software engineering and closely related. The intelligence part suddenly feels quite a bit ahead of all the rest of it - integrations (tools, knowledge), the necessity for new organizational workflows, processes, diffusion more generally. 2026 is going to be a high energy year as the industry metabolizes the new capability. - Andrej Karpathy tweet
Tenacity. It's so interesting to watch an agent relentlessly work at something. They never get tired, they never get demoralized, they just keep going and trying things where a person would have given up long ago to fight another day. It's a "feel the AGI" moment to watch it struggle with something for a long time just to come out victorious 30 minutes later. You realize that stamina is a core bottleneck to work and that with LLMs in hand it has been dramatically increased.
Speedups. It's not clear how to measure the "speedup" of LLM assistance. Certainly I feel net way faster at what I was going to do, but the main effect is that I do a lot more than I was going to do because 1) I can code up all kinds of things that just wouldn't have been worth coding before and 2) I can approach code that I couldn't work on before because of knowledge/skill issue. So certainly it's speedup, but it's possibly a lot more an expansion.
Leverage. LLMs are exceptionally good at looping until they meet specific goals and this is where most of the "feel the AGI" magic is to be found. Don't tell it what to do, give it success criteria and watch it go. Get it to write tests first and then pass them. Put it in the loop with a browser MCP. Write the naive algorithm that is very likely correct first, then ask it to optimize it while preserving correctness. Change your approach from imperative to declarative to get the agents looping longer and gain leverage.
Fun. I didn't anticipate that with agents programming feels *more* fun because a lot of the fill in the blanks drudgery is removed and what remains is the creative part. I also feel less blocked/stuck (which is not fun) and I experience a lot more courage because there's almost always a way to work hand in hand with it to make some positive progress. I have seen the opposite sentiment from other people too; LLM coding will split up engineers based on those who primarily liked coding and those who primarily liked building.
Atrophy. I've already noticed that I am slowly starting to atrophy my ability to write code manually. Generation (writing code) and discrimination (reading code) are different capabilities in the brain. Largely due to all the little mostly syntactic details involved in programming, you can review code just fine even if you struggle to write it.
Slopacolypse. I am bracing for 2026 as the year of the slopacolypse across all of github, substack, arxiv, X/instagram, and generally all digital media. We're also going to see a lot more AI hype productivity theater (is that even possible?), on the side of actual, real improvements.
Questions. A few of the questions on my mind:
- What happens to the "10X engineer" - the ratio of productivity between the mean and the max engineer? It's quite possible that this grows *a lot*.
- Armed with LLMs, do generalists increasingly outperform specialists? LLMs are a lot better at fill in the blanks (the micro) than grand strategy (the macro).
- What does LLM coding feel like in the future? Is it like playing StarCraft? Playing Factorio? Playing music?
- How much of society is bottlenecked by digital knowledge work?
TLDR Where does this leave us? LLM agent capabilities (Claude & Codex especially) have crossed some kind of threshold of coherence around December 2025 and caused a phase shift in software engineering and closely related. The intelligence part suddenly feels quite a bit ahead of all the rest of it - integrations (tools, knowledge), the necessity for new organizational workflows, processes, diffusion more generally. 2026 is going to be a high energy year as the industry metabolizes the new capability. - Andrej Karpathy tweet
Offshore
Photo
Illiquid
Once again TDK providing excellent read through for NHK Spring. +13% rev, +380% operating profit.
Will NHK fluff this layup again? https://t.co/ubDmGdS7Mt
tweet
Once again TDK providing excellent read through for NHK Spring. +13% rev, +380% operating profit.
Will NHK fluff this layup again? https://t.co/ubDmGdS7Mt
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Moon Dev
my clawdbot, Cracker just found a 22,610% return trading strategy
the craziest part is this is in the 1st hour
hand traders are cooked https://t.co/N6ma5oRpKF
tweet
my clawdbot, Cracker just found a 22,610% return trading strategy
the craziest part is this is in the 1st hour
hand traders are cooked https://t.co/N6ma5oRpKF
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Michael Fritzell (Asian Century Stocks)
A few years ago, nobody wanted to invest in memory stocks, because we all assumed the market would be destroyed by Chinese capacity. The jury’s still out on that one. https://t.co/jGM7SN21Ke
tweet
A few years ago, nobody wanted to invest in memory stocks, because we all assumed the market would be destroyed by Chinese capacity. The jury’s still out on that one. https://t.co/jGM7SN21Ke
tweet
Michael Fritzell (Asian Century Stocks)
RT @durov: French police is currently raiding X’s office in Paris. France is the only country in the world that is criminally persecuting all social networks that give people some degree of freedom (Telegram, X, TikTok…). Don’t be mistaken: this is not a free country.
tweet
RT @durov: French police is currently raiding X’s office in Paris. France is the only country in the world that is criminally persecuting all social networks that give people some degree of freedom (Telegram, X, TikTok…). Don’t be mistaken: this is not a free country.
tweet
Offshore
Video
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: This was 6 years ago.
Wondering how we’ll look back on clawdbot 6 years from now on.
tweet
RT @godofprompt: This was 6 years ago.
Wondering how we’ll look back on clawdbot 6 years from now on.
I just built a *functioning* React app by describing what I wanted to GPT-3.
I'm still in awe. https://t.co/UUKSYz2NJO - Sharif Shameemtweet
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: codex is used by all top engineers
codex hallucinates less and is more reliable than claude code
at least for now
tweet
RT @godofprompt: codex is used by all top engineers
codex hallucinates less and is more reliable than claude code
at least for now
Introducing the Codex app—a powerful command center for building with agents.
Now available on macOS.
https://t.co/HW05s2C9Nr - OpenAItweet
X (formerly Twitter)
OpenAI (@OpenAI) on X
Introducing the Codex app—a powerful command center for building with agents.
Now available on macOS.
https://t.co/HW05s2C9Nr
Now available on macOS.
https://t.co/HW05s2C9Nr
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: you’re all lying about openclaw
you’re leaving it run whole night, going safely to sleep
because deep inside you know it’s not AGI nor it’s sentient
when it will be AGI for real, you’ll never sleep the same way again
tweet
RT @godofprompt: you’re all lying about openclaw
you’re leaving it run whole night, going safely to sleep
because deep inside you know it’s not AGI nor it’s sentient
when it will be AGI for real, you’ll never sleep the same way again
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Moon Dev
clawdbot is cool, but can it make you money?
this guy had his clawbot find him a 71,057% ROI trading strategy
the complete masterclass: https://t.co/BmQ34aMcmF
tweet
clawdbot is cool, but can it make you money?
this guy had his clawbot find him a 71,057% ROI trading strategy
the complete masterclass: https://t.co/BmQ34aMcmF
tweet