God of Prompt
RT @free_ai_guides: Anthropic literally tells you how to prompt Claude.

Nobody reads it.

So I read their docs, studied the research on "psychological" prompts, and turned it into something you'll actually use:

→ 30 principles with examples
→ Prompt engineering mini-course
→ 15 strategic use cases
→ 10+ copy-paste mega-prompts

Comment "Anthropic" and I'll DM it to you.
tweet

God of Prompt
Anthropic

Anthropic literally tells you how to prompt Claude.

Nobody reads it.

So I read their docs, studied the research on "psychological" prompts, and turned it into something you'll actually use:

→ 30 principles with examples
→ Prompt engineering mini-course
→ 15 strategic use cases
→ 10+ copy-paste mega-prompts

Comment "Anthropic" and I'll DM it to you. - AI Guides
tweet

God of Prompt
RT @alex_prompter: the best 20 accounts to follow in AI:

@karpathy = LLMs king
@steipete = built openclaw
@gregisenberg = startup ideas king
@rileybrown = vibecode king
@corbin_braun = cursor king
@jackfriks = solo apps king
@levelsio = solo startups king
@marclou = solo startups king
@EXM7777 = AI ops + systems king
@eptwts = AI money twitter king
@godofprompt = prompt king
@vasuman = AI agents king
@AmirMushich= AI ads king
@0xROAS = AI UGCs king
@egeberkina = AI images king
@MengTo= AI landing pages king
@rryssf_ = automations king
@kloss_xyz = systems architecture king
@emollick = AI science king
@Hesamation = AI/ML king

follow them all and learn.
tweet

Moon Dev
SQN can misrepresent the truth in trading

Raw SQN is inflated by trade count. https://t.co/AzJz6nAOSF
tweet

Moon Dev
zoom is about to start

our private zoom for quants only is starting in just a bit

you get to see over my shoulder in real time

dont miss it there might be a couple tickets left

check here https://t.co/JbJdIbW2p9

moon dev
tweet

Illiquid
Towa and Fujibo rarely discussed here.

@zephyr_z9 Just sayin
Why not to focus on the memory supply chain that makes memory possible, like Towa Corp for HMB4. - Akhenaton
tweet

Moon Dev
Stop Getting Liquidated: A Step-by-Step Guide to Building Professional Trading Systems
tweet

Startup Archive
Paul Graham explains why you shouldn’t try to be a visionary

“Empirically, the way to do really big things seems to be to start with small things and grow them bigger. Want to dominate microcomputer software for decades? Start by writing a basic interpreter for a machine with a couple thousand users. Want to make the universal website and a giant vacuum for people’s time? Start by building a website where Harvard undergrads can stalk one another.”

Paul Graham continues:

“Neither Bill Gates nor Mark Zuckerberg knew how big their companies were going to get. All they knew was that they were onto something… Maybe it’s a bad idea to have really big ambitions initially, because the bigger your ambitions, the longer they’re going to take to realize and the long you’re projecting into the future, the more likely you’re going to be wrong.”

PG suggests starting with something small that works instead.

“I think the best way to do these big ideas is not to try and identify a precise point in the future and say, How do I get from here to there? Like the popular image of a visionary. I think a better model is Columbus who thought there was something to the West—I’ll sail westward. Start with something that works, that you know works, that’s small, and then when the opportunity comes to move, move westward. The popular image of a visionary is someone with a very precise view of the future, but empirically it’s probably better to have a blurry one.”
tweet

Fiscal.ai
Microsoft's spread between Operating Income & Free Cash Flow has never been wider.

Is the CapEx worth it?

$MSFT https://t.co/slzJUbmce9
tweet