Offshore
Photo
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
One of those sentiment indicators worth keeping an eye on.
Rising new listings typically reflect growing enthusiasm from both companies and investors — and historically, surges often appear when markets are getting warm, sometimes signaling pockets of elevated speculation rather than purely fundamentals-driven demand.
Martin Zweig put it well in 𝘞𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘞𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵:
“When the public becomes enthusiastic, it’s usually time to be cautious. When the public is despondent, it’s usually time to be aggressive.”
Not a timing tool on its own — but a signal worth layering into your thinking.
tweet
One of those sentiment indicators worth keeping an eye on.
Rising new listings typically reflect growing enthusiasm from both companies and investors — and historically, surges often appear when markets are getting warm, sometimes signaling pockets of elevated speculation rather than purely fundamentals-driven demand.
Martin Zweig put it well in 𝘞𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘞𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵:
“When the public becomes enthusiastic, it’s usually time to be cautious. When the public is despondent, it’s usually time to be aggressive.”
Not a timing tool on its own — but a signal worth layering into your thinking.
The IPO market is opening back up.
Nasdaq has had 731 new listings over the last 12 months.
Beginning to approach 2021 levels.
$NDAQ https://t.co/4T6bdkYKjc tweet
Offshore
Video
memenodes
When dad is kissing your sibling, and you are secretly plotting his murder https://t.co/EcUgWGUUS5
tweet
When dad is kissing your sibling, and you are secretly plotting his murder https://t.co/EcUgWGUUS5
tweet
Offshore
Video
Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: Claude is the smartest AI right now.
But 90% of people prompt it like ChatGPT.
That's why I made the Claude Mastery Guide:
→ How Claude thinks differently
→ Prompts built for Claude
→ Workflows that use its strengths
Comment "Claude" and I'll DM it free. https://t.co/v2SKsVeoOI
tweet
RT @godofprompt: Claude is the smartest AI right now.
But 90% of people prompt it like ChatGPT.
That's why I made the Claude Mastery Guide:
→ How Claude thinks differently
→ Prompts built for Claude
→ Workflows that use its strengths
Comment "Claude" and I'll DM it free. https://t.co/v2SKsVeoOI
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Moon Dev
claude code can actually help you automate your trading in 2026
spolier: it still cant just trade for you and make you a millionaire
but any trading trading strategy can now be tested then automated with claude code
https://t.co/Q5Z2eRanlV
tweet
claude code can actually help you automate your trading in 2026
spolier: it still cant just trade for you and make you a millionaire
but any trading trading strategy can now be tested then automated with claude code
https://t.co/Q5Z2eRanlV
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Moon Dev
dont regret missing tomorrow
tomorrows private zoom is going to be a movie
if you miss this, i truly dont think you want to be a successful trader
join here before it sells out: https://t.co/JbJdIbW2p9
moon dev
tweet
dont regret missing tomorrow
tomorrows private zoom is going to be a movie
if you miss this, i truly dont think you want to be a successful trader
join here before it sells out: https://t.co/JbJdIbW2p9
moon dev
tweet
Offshore
Video
Startup Archive
Steve Jobs: The difference between good people and great people is 50-to-1
“I’ve always considered part of my job was to keep the quality level of people in the organizations I work with very high. I mean that’s what I consider one of the few things I can contribute individually myself — versus the team that work with — is to really try to instill in the organization the goal of having only A players.”
Steve argues this is especially important in technology where there’s a huge range between the best person and the worst person:
“In a lot of fields, the difference between, say, the worst taxicab driver and the best taxicab driver to get you across town in Manhattan might be 2-to-1. The best one will get you there in 15 minutes, the worst one will get you there in half an hour… Or the best cook and the worst cook, maybe it’s 3-to-1… But in the field that I’m in. In software in particular. The difference between the best person and the worst person is about 100-to-1 or more.”
He continues:
“The difference between a good software person and a great software person is probably 50-to-1 or 25-to-1. Huge dynamic range. And therefore, I have found — and not just in software but in almost everything I’ve done — it really pays to go after the best people in the world.”
But as Steve points out, this isn’t always easy:
“It’s very painful when you have some people that are not the best people in the world, and you have to get rid of them. But I’ve found that my job has sometimes been exactly that, to get rid of some of the people that didn’t measure up. And I’ve always tried to do it in a humane way, but nonetheless it has to be done and it’s not ever fun.”
tweet
Steve Jobs: The difference between good people and great people is 50-to-1
“I’ve always considered part of my job was to keep the quality level of people in the organizations I work with very high. I mean that’s what I consider one of the few things I can contribute individually myself — versus the team that work with — is to really try to instill in the organization the goal of having only A players.”
Steve argues this is especially important in technology where there’s a huge range between the best person and the worst person:
“In a lot of fields, the difference between, say, the worst taxicab driver and the best taxicab driver to get you across town in Manhattan might be 2-to-1. The best one will get you there in 15 minutes, the worst one will get you there in half an hour… Or the best cook and the worst cook, maybe it’s 3-to-1… But in the field that I’m in. In software in particular. The difference between the best person and the worst person is about 100-to-1 or more.”
He continues:
“The difference between a good software person and a great software person is probably 50-to-1 or 25-to-1. Huge dynamic range. And therefore, I have found — and not just in software but in almost everything I’ve done — it really pays to go after the best people in the world.”
But as Steve points out, this isn’t always easy:
“It’s very painful when you have some people that are not the best people in the world, and you have to get rid of them. But I’ve found that my job has sometimes been exactly that, to get rid of some of the people that didn’t measure up. And I’ve always tried to do it in a humane way, but nonetheless it has to be done and it’s not ever fun.”
tweet