Offshore
Photo
Clark Square Capital
Looks like Interactive Brokers is adding Brazil to its tradeable markets https://t.co/5SRhB9JXdg
tweet
Looks like Interactive Brokers is adding Brazil to its tradeable markets https://t.co/5SRhB9JXdg
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Wasteland Capital
2021 grift hall-of-famer $LAZR finally filed Chapter 11.
This sh*t was traded by imbeciles at $23bn in 2021, and the assets were now sold for $110m to, I kid you not, Quantum Computing $QUBT. Ayoo!
And the founder’s $83m Palisades home burned down in the fire this year. Sad. https://t.co/2X2r8did16
tweet
2021 grift hall-of-famer $LAZR finally filed Chapter 11.
This sh*t was traded by imbeciles at $23bn in 2021, and the assets were now sold for $110m to, I kid you not, Quantum Computing $QUBT. Ayoo!
And the founder’s $83m Palisades home burned down in the fire this year. Sad. https://t.co/2X2r8did16
The spoils of tech mega-grift: $LAZR founder Austin Russell owns the $83m house from Succession. The stock, which was pumped to the dumbest investors by mega-banks, has lost $15.8bn since 2021 (down 77%). The biz had $41m rev, a negative 148% gross margin & lost $446m last year. https://t.co/vDBN4aOk8t tweet
Offshore
Photo
EndGame Macro
This is Ford acknowledging the first EV strategy didn’t match how truck buyers behave in a high rate environment. The all electric F-150 was expensive to build, hard to make money on, and demand dropped fast once payments rose and tax credits faded. So instead of burning billions trying to force it, Ford is pivoting toward what sells and pays the bills with more hybrids, extended range electric setups, and smaller, cheaper EVs that don’t require a lifestyle change. Gas and hybrid F-Series keep funding the company, while EV investment shifts toward affordability, energy storage, and platforms that can actually scale without massive losses. It’s less about ideology and more about survival and to protect the cash engine now, stay in the EV game, and wait until the economics make sense again.
tweet
This is Ford acknowledging the first EV strategy didn’t match how truck buyers behave in a high rate environment. The all electric F-150 was expensive to build, hard to make money on, and demand dropped fast once payments rose and tax credits faded. So instead of burning billions trying to force it, Ford is pivoting toward what sells and pays the bills with more hybrids, extended range electric setups, and smaller, cheaper EVs that don’t require a lifestyle change. Gas and hybrid F-Series keep funding the company, while EV investment shifts toward affordability, energy storage, and platforms that can actually scale without massive losses. It’s less about ideology and more about survival and to protect the cash engine now, stay in the EV game, and wait until the economics make sense again.
BREAKING: In a massive hit, Ford, $F, is writing down $19.5 billion in EV investments.
Ford also says it will stop producing the electric version of the F-150. https://t.co/cWMPDeO9d0 tweet
Offshore
Photo
Giuliano
The reason behind each pick:
- Poor Charlie's Almanack.
The other day, a friend asked me for a book recommendations that would "rewire his brain." This is the only book I could think of that changes your thinking on so many levels.
- Guns, Germs and Steel.
We are largely ignorant about what has happened before us. This book gives you a fantastic framework for the past 10,000 years. How things played out.
- 1984.
Winston remains sane in a world full of craziness. Thinking is banned. Reading and writing are prohibited. Humanness is forbidden.
- Deep Simplicity.
The most complex systems are rooted in deep simplicity. Whenever you see something crazy complex (DNA, biological matter, the motion of bodies), it's always a few things interacting with one another and compounding over time.
- The Pleasure of Finding Things Out.
You can have fun by just thinking. Careful with pseudoscience. Beautiful takes on things.
- From Third World to First.
"Study the life of Lee Kuan Yew, you'll be flabbergasted" - Munger
- Zen and the Art of Motorcycle maintenance.
This book gives you a better understanding of deep human emotions, archetypes of people, what an obsession over knowledge can do to you, and you get a better grasp of things that you sense but can't fingerpoint.
- The Wealth of Nations OR the Origin of Species.
From any of these two, you'll get what it feels like to read an intellectually honest and curious individual. Someone who really writes to get to truth and advance civilization. + in both you get a great understanding of economics or evolutionary biology.
- The Prince.
I read this over 2 years ago but it's still top of mind. Deep insights into politics, trends in society, and how a 'wise prince should act'. It's fascinating because, for each insight, Machiavelli provides a historical example.
- Leonardo Da Vinci.
You don't realize how far extremely talented people can get if they also put time to it. The other idea is that, while some might write or just think, Da Vinci drew.
- The Brothers Karamazov.
No other author speaks to your soul as Dostoevsky does. What rationality can do to you, what goodness is about (or not?), and what does everything mean.
- Built from Scratch.
"How a couple of regular guys built a $380bn company." What business is about (customer satisfaction). You're only in business as long as you serve your customers well.
tweet
The reason behind each pick:
- Poor Charlie's Almanack.
The other day, a friend asked me for a book recommendations that would "rewire his brain." This is the only book I could think of that changes your thinking on so many levels.
- Guns, Germs and Steel.
We are largely ignorant about what has happened before us. This book gives you a fantastic framework for the past 10,000 years. How things played out.
- 1984.
Winston remains sane in a world full of craziness. Thinking is banned. Reading and writing are prohibited. Humanness is forbidden.
- Deep Simplicity.
The most complex systems are rooted in deep simplicity. Whenever you see something crazy complex (DNA, biological matter, the motion of bodies), it's always a few things interacting with one another and compounding over time.
- The Pleasure of Finding Things Out.
You can have fun by just thinking. Careful with pseudoscience. Beautiful takes on things.
- From Third World to First.
"Study the life of Lee Kuan Yew, you'll be flabbergasted" - Munger
- Zen and the Art of Motorcycle maintenance.
This book gives you a better understanding of deep human emotions, archetypes of people, what an obsession over knowledge can do to you, and you get a better grasp of things that you sense but can't fingerpoint.
- The Wealth of Nations OR the Origin of Species.
From any of these two, you'll get what it feels like to read an intellectually honest and curious individual. Someone who really writes to get to truth and advance civilization. + in both you get a great understanding of economics or evolutionary biology.
- The Prince.
I read this over 2 years ago but it's still top of mind. Deep insights into politics, trends in society, and how a 'wise prince should act'. It's fascinating because, for each insight, Machiavelli provides a historical example.
- Leonardo Da Vinci.
You don't realize how far extremely talented people can get if they also put time to it. The other idea is that, while some might write or just think, Da Vinci drew.
- The Brothers Karamazov.
No other author speaks to your soul as Dostoevsky does. What rationality can do to you, what goodness is about (or not?), and what does everything mean.
- Built from Scratch.
"How a couple of regular guys built a $380bn company." What business is about (customer satisfaction). You're only in business as long as you serve your customers well.
If you want to read 1 astounding book every month in 2026, follow this plan: (5 of these are so good that I either gifted or lent)
Jan: Poor Charlie's Almanack.
Feb: Guns, Germs and Steel.
Mar: 1984.
April: Deep Simplicity.
May: The Pleasure of Finding Things out.
Jun: From Third World to First.
July: Zen and the Art of Motorcycle maintenance.
Aug: The Wealth of Nations OR the Origin of Species.
Sep: The Prince.
Oct: Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaacson.
Nov: The Brothers Karamazov.
Dec: Built from Scratch. tweet
EndGame Macro
QT Ended But The Plumbing Still Needed Help
When people see that the Fed injected $5.2 billion, the knee jerk reaction is that something broke. But an overnight repo isn’t QE and it isn’t a bailout. It’s basic plumbing. Cash goes out against Treasuries and comes back the next day. By itself, it doesn’t stimulate the economy or prop up asset prices.
Why it still matters even after QT ended
QT has officially ended. The Fed stopped draining reserves. But ending QT doesn’t mean liquidity suddenly becomes abundant or that money markets can’t get tight. It just means the Fed isn’t actively shrinking its balance sheet anymore.
What matters here isn’t the dollar amount, it’s the fact the Fed was needed at all. In normal conditions, banks and dealers handle short term funding quietly in private markets. When they don’t, it’s usually because balance sheets are tighter than they look. That’s how stress starts to show up not with a crash, but with the pipes needing help.
We’ve seen this movie before. In 2019, repo operations were brushed off as technical until it became clear the system had far less slack than people assumed. In 2020, the same plumbing issue reappeared under extreme pressure. Different scale, same mechanics.
Why now
The timing makes sense. Even with QT ended, reserves aren’t unlimited. Treasury issuance has been heavy, settlement days matter, and year end always makes banks more defensive. Balance sheets get protected, regulatory optics kick in, and nobody wants to be the marginal liquidity provider in December. So the Fed steps in not to stimulate, but to keep funding markets orderly. That’s exactly what these tools are designed to do.
My View
This isn’t a crisis yet but it’s not nothing. Market stress rarely announces itself loudly at first. It shows up quietly, in places most people don’t watch. If this stays isolated, it fades. If it keeps happening, it’s a signal the system is running tighter than the headlines suggest even without QT.
tweet
QT Ended But The Plumbing Still Needed Help
When people see that the Fed injected $5.2 billion, the knee jerk reaction is that something broke. But an overnight repo isn’t QE and it isn’t a bailout. It’s basic plumbing. Cash goes out against Treasuries and comes back the next day. By itself, it doesn’t stimulate the economy or prop up asset prices.
Why it still matters even after QT ended
QT has officially ended. The Fed stopped draining reserves. But ending QT doesn’t mean liquidity suddenly becomes abundant or that money markets can’t get tight. It just means the Fed isn’t actively shrinking its balance sheet anymore.
What matters here isn’t the dollar amount, it’s the fact the Fed was needed at all. In normal conditions, banks and dealers handle short term funding quietly in private markets. When they don’t, it’s usually because balance sheets are tighter than they look. That’s how stress starts to show up not with a crash, but with the pipes needing help.
We’ve seen this movie before. In 2019, repo operations were brushed off as technical until it became clear the system had far less slack than people assumed. In 2020, the same plumbing issue reappeared under extreme pressure. Different scale, same mechanics.
Why now
The timing makes sense. Even with QT ended, reserves aren’t unlimited. Treasury issuance has been heavy, settlement days matter, and year end always makes banks more defensive. Balance sheets get protected, regulatory optics kick in, and nobody wants to be the marginal liquidity provider in December. So the Fed steps in not to stimulate, but to keep funding markets orderly. That’s exactly what these tools are designed to do.
My View
This isn’t a crisis yet but it’s not nothing. Market stress rarely announces itself loudly at first. It shows up quietly, in places most people don’t watch. If this stays isolated, it fades. If it keeps happening, it’s a signal the system is running tighter than the headlines suggest even without QT.
Federal Reserve injects $5.2 billion into US banking system via overnight repos, marking the 6th largest action since pandemic amid mounting funding pressures
#MacroEdge tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
MacroEdge (@MacroEdgeRes) on X
Federal Reserve injects $5.2 billion into US banking system via overnight repos, marking the 6th largest action since pandemic amid mounting funding pressures
#MacroEdge
#MacroEdge
Offshore
Photo
EndGame Macro
Miran Isn’t Warning About Inflation He’s Warning About a Policy Mistake
Miran isn’t warning about inflation coming back. He’s warning about the Fed fighting the wrong enemy. His core message is that today’s inflation numbers are still carrying the after effects of 2021–22, not evidence of fresh overheating. Prices are high, yes but they’re mostly stable now, and policy shouldn’t be trying to undo a level shift that already happened.
The shelter tell
Housing is the biggest giveaway. Miran is very clear that shelter inflation is a lagging echo, not a live fire. Market rents rolled over a while ago; the official PCE shelter measure just took longer to catch up and, in his view, has already overshot. That means the next move is down, and probably faster than most people expect. Add in slowing population growth from weaker net migration, and the demand side softens even more. That’s not an inflation setup, that’s a disinflation pipeline that’s already in motion.
The part he really cares about
What stood out most to me was how blunt he was about phantom inflation.
He basically calls out parts of PCE especially portfolio management fees as statistical noise that has nothing to do with real world pricing pressure. Asset prices go up, fee revenue rises mechanically, and the index treats that as inflation even though actual fees are compressing. His point is simple…policy is being kept tighter than necessary because of measurement artifacts, not genuine demand pressure.
Tariffs aren’t the villain
On tariffs, Miran goes out of his way to cool the room. Even if tariffs push prices up, he frames it as a small, one!time level shift something central banks should look through, not react to. More importantly, he doesn’t even think tariffs explain the recent goods inflation. U.S. goods prices don’t stand out versus other countries, and import heavy goods aren’t behaving differently enough to justify the narrative. In his mind, this isn’t an inflation regime change.
The real risk
The clearest signal in the whole speech is that he’s worried about the labor market. He keeps coming back to how quickly employment can weaken once it turns, and how hard that is to reverse. Given policy lags, his argument is basically that if you wait for inflation to look perfect on lagging or distorted measures, you’ll be cutting after the damage is already done.
My View
Miran is quietly staking out a very dovish risk assessment without sounding dovish. He’s saying disinflation is doing the work on its own, inflation risks are overstated by the data we’re fixated on, and the bigger mistake now would be holding policy too tight for too long. Read plainly, this isn’t an inflation warning, it’s a policy error warning, aimed squarely at deflationary and labor market downside that the Fed could still avoid if it moves in time.
tweet
Miran Isn’t Warning About Inflation He’s Warning About a Policy Mistake
Miran isn’t warning about inflation coming back. He’s warning about the Fed fighting the wrong enemy. His core message is that today’s inflation numbers are still carrying the after effects of 2021–22, not evidence of fresh overheating. Prices are high, yes but they’re mostly stable now, and policy shouldn’t be trying to undo a level shift that already happened.
The shelter tell
Housing is the biggest giveaway. Miran is very clear that shelter inflation is a lagging echo, not a live fire. Market rents rolled over a while ago; the official PCE shelter measure just took longer to catch up and, in his view, has already overshot. That means the next move is down, and probably faster than most people expect. Add in slowing population growth from weaker net migration, and the demand side softens even more. That’s not an inflation setup, that’s a disinflation pipeline that’s already in motion.
The part he really cares about
What stood out most to me was how blunt he was about phantom inflation.
He basically calls out parts of PCE especially portfolio management fees as statistical noise that has nothing to do with real world pricing pressure. Asset prices go up, fee revenue rises mechanically, and the index treats that as inflation even though actual fees are compressing. His point is simple…policy is being kept tighter than necessary because of measurement artifacts, not genuine demand pressure.
Tariffs aren’t the villain
On tariffs, Miran goes out of his way to cool the room. Even if tariffs push prices up, he frames it as a small, one!time level shift something central banks should look through, not react to. More importantly, he doesn’t even think tariffs explain the recent goods inflation. U.S. goods prices don’t stand out versus other countries, and import heavy goods aren’t behaving differently enough to justify the narrative. In his mind, this isn’t an inflation regime change.
The real risk
The clearest signal in the whole speech is that he’s worried about the labor market. He keeps coming back to how quickly employment can weaken once it turns, and how hard that is to reverse. Given policy lags, his argument is basically that if you wait for inflation to look perfect on lagging or distorted measures, you’ll be cutting after the damage is already done.
My View
Miran is quietly staking out a very dovish risk assessment without sounding dovish. He’s saying disinflation is doing the work on its own, inflation risks are overstated by the data we’re fixated on, and the bigger mistake now would be holding policy too tight for too long. Read plainly, this isn’t an inflation warning, it’s a policy error warning, aimed squarely at deflationary and labor market downside that the Fed could still avoid if it moves in time.
Speech by Governor Miran on the inflation outlook @ColumbiaIGP: https://t.co/jnodBVx6xK
Watch live: https://t.co/MmMIGmKklO
Learn more about Governor Miran: https://t.co/e2PfCOyRwd tweet
Offshore
Video
EndGame Macro
The Real Battle Over South America’s Oil and Minerals
I know I’m on a Landman kick, but I think it offers a good look into what’s really at stake. In a lot of South America, the fight over oil and critical minerals isn’t just about what’s underground, it’s about who controls the ground above it. When armed groups or political factions can claim territory, tax operations, buy off officials, and enforce rules with violence, they become a shadow regulator sitting on top of the state. That changes everything where projects slow down, costs rise, security becomes a permanent line item, and supply turns fragile.
That’s why places like Venezuela matter so much. It’s not only the world’s largest proven oil reserves, but a huge stockpile of minerals that feed modern energy, technology, and defense. And despite all the noise, U.S. companies are still deeply involved across the region…Chevron in Venezuela under license, Exxon and Chevron in Guyana, Apache in Suriname, Exxon and Chevron in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta, Exxon offshore Brazil, Chevron downstream in Colombia. Put it together and the picture is clear…local disorder becomes global leverage. Oil, copper, lithium they all sit upstream of everything. This isn’t melodrama. It’s the risk premium hiding inside your commodity price.
tweet
The Real Battle Over South America’s Oil and Minerals
I know I’m on a Landman kick, but I think it offers a good look into what’s really at stake. In a lot of South America, the fight over oil and critical minerals isn’t just about what’s underground, it’s about who controls the ground above it. When armed groups or political factions can claim territory, tax operations, buy off officials, and enforce rules with violence, they become a shadow regulator sitting on top of the state. That changes everything where projects slow down, costs rise, security becomes a permanent line item, and supply turns fragile.
That’s why places like Venezuela matter so much. It’s not only the world’s largest proven oil reserves, but a huge stockpile of minerals that feed modern energy, technology, and defense. And despite all the noise, U.S. companies are still deeply involved across the region…Chevron in Venezuela under license, Exxon and Chevron in Guyana, Apache in Suriname, Exxon and Chevron in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta, Exxon offshore Brazil, Chevron downstream in Colombia. Put it together and the picture is clear…local disorder becomes global leverage. Oil, copper, lithium they all sit upstream of everything. This isn’t melodrama. It’s the risk premium hiding inside your commodity price.
tweet
EndGame Macro
Keep an eye on this. When calls like this actually turn into real action, it’s usually not about fairness, it’s about timing. Bans on insider or political trading tend to show up late in cycles, when excess, optics, and public anger peak at the same time markets do. It’s the system trying to restore legitimacy after the easy money has already been made. That doesn’t mean prices crash the next day, but historically it’s a sign the environment is maturing, not beginning. When the rules tighten for the people closest to the information, it’s often because the upside has already been largely harvested.
tweet
Keep an eye on this. When calls like this actually turn into real action, it’s usually not about fairness, it’s about timing. Bans on insider or political trading tend to show up late in cycles, when excess, optics, and public anger peak at the same time markets do. It’s the system trying to restore legitimacy after the easy money has already been made. That doesn’t mean prices crash the next day, but historically it’s a sign the environment is maturing, not beginning. When the rules tighten for the people closest to the information, it’s often because the upside has already been largely harvested.
BREAKING: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said: Stock trading by Congress members must end tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) on X
BREAKING: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said: Stock trading by Congress members must end
Offshore
Photo
EndGame Macro
Why the Inflation Story May End in Deflation
The Harvard Pricing Lab chart is pretty straightforward. Goods prices were drifting lower, then the trade war started and the trend flipped. Imported goods jump the most, but what really matters is that domestic goods rise too. That’s the tell. Tariffs don’t stay neatly contained at the border because they leak into costs, supply chains, and pricing behavior across the whole economy.
Why the inflation story doesn’t end there
The first effect is obvious where prices go up. That’s the part everyone talks about. The next effect is quieter and more dangerous. A lot of these goods are price sensitive. People delay purchases, trade down, or walk away. Companies are stuck choosing between passing on costs and losing volume, or eating costs and losing margins. Either way, cash flow tightens. That’s not an inflation spiral, it’s a slow squeeze on liquidity.
Once margins get hit, behavior changes. Hiring slows. Investment gets pulled back. Inventories shrink. Retaliation from trading partners adds another layer of demand loss. What started as an inflationary shock begins to work in reverse, pulling demand and prices lower over time.
What comes next
There’s one more channel people tend to miss. If tariffs actually shrink trade imbalances, they also shrink the foreign dollars that usually get recycled back into U.S. stocks, bonds, and Treasuries. Less recycling means less marginal support for asset prices and funding markets. That’s another tightening force that doesn’t show up in CPI, but absolutely shows up in liquidity.
My View
This doesn’t end with runaway inflation. It ends with growth and liquidity doing the disinflation for you. The risk isn’t prices reaccelerating, it’s the system tightening until demand cracks. Watch margins, layoffs, credit spreads, and funding conditions.
tweet
Why the Inflation Story May End in Deflation
The Harvard Pricing Lab chart is pretty straightforward. Goods prices were drifting lower, then the trade war started and the trend flipped. Imported goods jump the most, but what really matters is that domestic goods rise too. That’s the tell. Tariffs don’t stay neatly contained at the border because they leak into costs, supply chains, and pricing behavior across the whole economy.
Why the inflation story doesn’t end there
The first effect is obvious where prices go up. That’s the part everyone talks about. The next effect is quieter and more dangerous. A lot of these goods are price sensitive. People delay purchases, trade down, or walk away. Companies are stuck choosing between passing on costs and losing volume, or eating costs and losing margins. Either way, cash flow tightens. That’s not an inflation spiral, it’s a slow squeeze on liquidity.
Once margins get hit, behavior changes. Hiring slows. Investment gets pulled back. Inventories shrink. Retaliation from trading partners adds another layer of demand loss. What started as an inflationary shock begins to work in reverse, pulling demand and prices lower over time.
What comes next
There’s one more channel people tend to miss. If tariffs actually shrink trade imbalances, they also shrink the foreign dollars that usually get recycled back into U.S. stocks, bonds, and Treasuries. Less recycling means less marginal support for asset prices and funding markets. That’s another tightening force that doesn’t show up in CPI, but absolutely shows up in liquidity.
My View
This doesn’t end with runaway inflation. It ends with growth and liquidity doing the disinflation for you. The risk isn’t prices reaccelerating, it’s the system tightening until demand cracks. Watch margins, layoffs, credit spreads, and funding conditions.
Harvard’s Pricing Lab data shows that goods prices – which were previously declining – have been on the rise since Trump started his trade war. Even domestic goods prices rose, though by a smaller amount. https://t.co/A2PoivRJcK tweet