Offshore

1 view21:26

EndGame Macro
If the Labor Market Were Strong, We’d Have Seen the Report Already

The official explanation is straightforward: the shutdown froze the BLS, they couldn’t run the October household survey, and because that survey can’t be recreated after the fact, there’s no full report to release. On the surface, it sounds procedural…unfortunate, but innocent.

But when you look at what data is available, and what’s happening in the labor market underneath, the timing feels a lot less accidental.

The Data Didn’t Vanish They Just Chose Not to Publish

The payroll survey, the one businesses submit electronically was collected.
That means the government does have job gains and losses, hours worked, wage growth, sector level hiring trends, and revisions.

Those numbers could easily be released with a disclaimer saying, “household data will be added later.”

Instead, they decided to wait and blend October into the November report that arrives after the Fed’s final meeting of the year. That’s a choice, not a technical impossibility.

Why That Choice Matters Right Now

The Challenger report shows October layoffs surged to the highest level for that month in 22 years. Warehousing, tech, and logistics are cutting aggressively. Planned hiring is the weakest since 2011. That’s an an early sign the labor market is cooling faster than the headlines suggest.

If the official October report showed:
•a jump in unemployment,
•downward revisions to previous months,
•or a clear slowdown in hiring,

it would hit right as policymakers and markets are already nervous about growth, tariffs, and a shaky global backdrop.

Not releasing that picture avoids an uncomfortable moment…one big, clean headline that would have forced everyone to rethink the soft landing story.

And by December, any weakness gets folded into a blended dataset where the inflection is harder to pinpoint.

You don’t need a conspiracy theory to see the incentive structure here. Just basic political instinct.

A Fair Skeptical Read

The most plausible interpretation is that the BLS had enough information to publish something, but that something likely pointed to a softer labor market at a very inconvenient time.

So instead of one sharp data point, we’ll get a blurrier version in mid December.

And in markets, blurry data is often the surest sign that the underlying picture isn’t as pretty as people hoped.
tweet

1 view21:26